15 Nov 2025, 05:59 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions Posted: 30 Nov 2011, 10:08 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/15/09 Posts: 204 Post Likes: +9 Location: Sheridan, WY KSHR
Aircraft: 601P/Superstar 700
|
|
|
Looking for input/experience with running the 414 at long range cruise settings instead of "go fast" mode. Fuel burn, power settings, altitude at what indicated airspeed and true air speed?
Assuming about 1.2 - 1.3 X best glide for best long range cruise indicated airspeed. Would plan on running LOP (with JPI and GAMIS of course) even though RAM is opposed to LOP operations.
The 414 is not subject to the spar A.D. but has several exhaust A.D.s. Also sounds like the landing gear needs to be rigged each year by a knowledgeable shop. Surprisingly good accelerate/stop distance of 3,000'. Wondering how the landing gear would be on good for occasional landings on good condition dirt/grass strips? Assuming a well maintained airframe, can annuals expected to be in the $5K - $10K range? Any big expense "gotchas" to know about? Guessing about the same cost to run a 414 as a P58 Baron (owned a P for about 700 hours).
Thanks for your input.
Tom
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions Posted: 01 Dec 2011, 09:08 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6062 Post Likes: +715 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
|
The only twin Cessna I would consider would be a 414A or 421C.
Lots of room and payload.
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions Posted: 01 Dec 2011, 09:55 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/15/09 Posts: 204 Post Likes: +9 Location: Sheridan, WY KSHR
Aircraft: 601P/Superstar 700
|
|
|
Marc, how about a 414 that has 2,100+ of useful load and RAM VII 335 hp engines? A draw back to the short body 414 is only an alky windshield so not FIKI...but that doesn't matter much to me regarding the way I do my best to avoid/escape inadvertent ice. And the 414 is not subject to the expensive spar A.D. but of course has several exhaust A.D.s.
Tom
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions Posted: 01 Dec 2011, 11:27 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 12/12/07 Posts: 23808 Post Likes: +7662 Location: Columbia, SC (KCUB)
Aircraft: 2003 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Hi Tom
Just had an occasion to look at a nice 414 in the shop behind my hangar yesterday. Nice plane, but one thing that caught my eye was the lack of corrosion proofing visible through the inspection plates open in the aft fuselage and wings. Your location should not present any present problems, but since these planes move around the country a lot during their lifetime, one may be exposed to a coastal environment during a previous owners stewardship.
Zinc Chromating all the interior panels like Beech did on many models really helps preserve these wonderful machines much better than just the clad normally applied to the aluminum sheets. The corrosion that you mostly need to be concerned about is in the wings. Its hard to spot (I'd suggest using a flexible borescope), but if its present the plane is a yard ornament.
_________________ Minister of Ice Family Motto: If you aren't scared, you're not having fun!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions Posted: 02 Dec 2011, 14:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/07/10 Posts: 223 Location: KONZ
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Hi Tom Can't really answer your 'cost' question, but I would suggest you take a little closer look at the Cessna exhaust system and its recurring inspection requirements. Unlike the P Baron you are familiar with, those Cessna installations mount the turbo on the spar. The exhaust from the engine is routed through a bunch of ball joints that are necessary to handle engine movement relative to the fixed turbo, hence the frequent inspection requirement because you don't want to blow torch the spar when a leak occurs. All those 1600dF+ pipes moving around relative to the fixed mount turbo is a bit disconcerting to me. YMMV  +10 on that Don, Flew into Fairfield Iowa once in a 414 ram VII and after landing did my usual walk around look see. Noticed a slight discoloration of the paint where the exhaust was routed....Ended up finding a nickle sized hole in the exhaust after the turbo. The mechanic found the metal was so thin he stuck his finger in the hole and made it the size of a quarter while we watched. Afterwards he turned to me and said, " Had you guys flown back home you'd have blow torched your wing spar". And the plane just came out of annual.... Thankyou Lord
_________________ Mike Long CFI-A/I/M
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 03:03 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/15/09 Posts: 707 Post Likes: +177
Aircraft: 1984 B36TC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Hi Tom Can't really answer your 'cost' question, but I would suggest you take a little closer look at the Cessna exhaust system and its recurring inspection requirements. Unlike the P Baron you are familiar with, those Cessna installations mount the turbo on the spar. The exhaust from the engine is routed through a bunch of ball joints that are necessary to handle engine movement relative to the fixed turbo, hence the frequent inspection requirement because you don't want to blow torch the spar when a leak occurs. All those 1600dF+ pipes moving around relative to the fixed mount turbo is a bit disconcerting to me. YMMV  +10 on that Don, Flew into Fairfield Iowa once in a 414 ram VII and after landing did my usual walk around look see. Noticed a slight discoloration of the paint where the exhaust was routed....Ended up finding a nickle sized hole in the exhaust after the turbo. The mechanic found the metal was so thin he stuck his finger in the hole and made it the size of a quarter while we watched. Afterwards he turned to me and said, " Had you guys flown back home you'd have blow torched your wing spar". And the plane just came out of annual.... Thankyou Lord
It's just a bad design. Why the turbo isn't bolted to the engine just doesn't make sense. What were they thinking? What was to be gained? Not for me to dangerous.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 09:44 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6062 Post Likes: +715 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
Tom, Im pretty sure that the 414 as the spar AD. I believe the 414A also as the spar AD at 15000 hrs. Here is a 414A Ram 4 with 2374 useful load thats been for sale for over 2 years. http://www.csplane.com/6727.htmI just like the A without the tip tanks, just nicer and flys better. Username Protected wrote: Marc, how about a 414 that has 2,100+ of useful load and RAM VII 335 hp engines? A draw back to the short body 414 is only an alky windshield so not FIKI...but that doesn't matter much to me regarding the way I do my best to avoid/escape inadvertent ice. And the 414 is not subject to the expensive spar A.D. but of course has several exhaust A.D.s.
Tom
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 11:27 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/08 Posts: 560 Post Likes: +22 Location: CYXH - Medicine Hat, AB
Aircraft: DA42
|
|
|
Marc
Here's a quick breakdown on the Cessna Twin Spar issue :
Cessna 401/401A/402B airplanes with 6,500 hours or more Cessna 402/402A/402B airplanes with 6,500 hours or more Cessna 402C airplanes with 14,500 hours or more Cessna 411/411A airplanes with 5,500 hours or more Cessna 414A airplanes (to s/n 200) with 8,500 hours or more Cessna 414A airplanes (s/n 201+) with 14,500 hours or more
I believe that there is a spar strap that is also required on some aircraft at high hours but none of them are the 414. The 414 is very similar to the 340 (or vice versa) which has also been without spar AD's.
_________________ Doug Thompson CPL, ME, IR CYXH - Medicine Hat, AB
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions Posted: 04 Dec 2011, 12:40 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/29/07 Posts: 739 Post Likes: +234
Aircraft: Baron 55
|
|
|
I have flown a 414 for 19 years. My 2 cents:
1. A very comfortable ride. Pressure and A/C. They are dirt cheap today.
2. Gotta get this dog up in the flight levels to get the 195kts because it had a WIDE body and will barely make 160 at 10,000.
3. Mine (310hp) got maybe 700 fpm on a good day. Hope your RAM does better.
4. The increased weight from RAM is mostly from the formula used by FARs. If you lower the stall speed which VGs in fact do, the formula computes a higher allowable gross weight. Whether the wings know this number is another matter. Higher horsepower of course is a help.
5. I always used 30 inches and 2100 rpm. It gave a quiet smooth ride, and burned about 15 a side. I block planned for 35 an hour total. Never crashed once.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions Posted: 01 Mar 2012, 19:13 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/16/10 Posts: 1287 Post Likes: +458 Location: Prescott, AZ
Aircraft: A36
|
|
|
Why are these planes so cheap? Fuel burn?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|