12 Nov 2025, 14:04 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Trade your Baron for a Cessna 400 Posted: 09 May 2011, 16:30 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8870 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Kelly is a competitor to TKS.
Kelly's approach is to use a heated wing. Kellys approach is to either melt the wing or at least a couple sets of 100Amp generators trying to get there  . The 'trade' aircraft probably spent most of its life on a experimental AW certificate and had several iterations of their system put on and pulled off those wings.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Trade your Baron for a Cessna 400 Posted: 09 May 2011, 17:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/12/09 Posts: 3624 Post Likes: +1192 Company: Leopold Aero, LLC Location: KPTW Heritage Field Pottstown, PA
Aircraft: 1978 Baron E55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Kelly is a competitor to TKS.
Kelly's approach is to use a heated wing. Kellys approach is to either melt the wing or at least a couple sets of 100Amp generators trying to get there  . The 'trade' aircraft probably spent most of its life on a experimental AW certificate and had several iterations of their system put on and pulled off those wings.
The hangar next to me has a Cessna 400 with the ThermalWing installed. It's pretty slick, no fluid to add, and then say it works well -- they pick up ice often flying back and forth to Chicago.
_________________ The advice you get is worth what you paid for it... Mike Dechnik KPTW '78 E55
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Trade your Baron for a Cessna 400 Posted: 10 May 2011, 06:50 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/12/08 Posts: 334 Post Likes: +35 Location: Altadena, CA/Oakley, UT
|
|
|
Totally agree about the Thermawing: that was a complete disaster on my Columbia 350. That product, coupled with the delays in certification of the G1000 airplane and a hailstorm that damaged about 40 brand-new airplanes that were parked outside the manufacturing facility while waiting for G1000 certification, is pretty much the chain of events that took down Columbia as a stand-alone manufacturer. The Thermawing broke a bunch of alternator belts, killed two alternators (note that the deice system uses one stand-alone 100A alternator, and doesn't share alternators with other airplane electrical systems), went through two controllers and two sets of heaters before I gave up. Ultimately I wound up with TKS, which I like much better because (a) it works, and (b) it looks better.
The comment about having formerly had an experimental airworthiness certificate is almost certainly off base. The only experimental Columbias I know about are the Columbia 400 and Columbia 350 prototypes. The one under the link has a serial number way too far down the line for that, or even for the G1000 certification airplane.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Trade your Baron for a Cessna 400 Posted: 10 May 2011, 09:12 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8870 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The comment about having formerly had an experimental airworthiness certificate is almost certainly off base. The only experimental Columbias I know about are the Columbia 400 and Columbia 350 prototypes. The one under the link has a serial number way too far down the line for that, or even for the G1000 certification airplane. The thermawing is a STC that most definitely changes the shape of the airfoil. To get it approved, the aircraft had to be modified from its certificated specs. The only way that the aircraft was allowed to fly after the developmental thermawing panels were put on it and the point in time the STC was granted was on a 'research and development' experimental airworthiness certificate (this comes with restrictions as 'required flight crew only' ). Once the components are removed, the plane undergoes a compliance inspection to certify that it is in conformance with its original AW certificate and it goes back on that. If the STC is granted the plane also goes back on its standard AW certificate and the addition is covered under the STC. This is different from 'experimental amateur built'. Edit: Just looked up the registration. I was wrong. The plane IS STILL on a experimental certificate. Airworthiness Classification Experimental Category Research and Development Crew Training Market Survey A/W Date 04/02/2010It is a paperwork exercise to get it back onto its standard certifcate and presumably the seller would do that before the trade. Just something to be aware of when buying an aircraft used for R&D (and make sure the wing-numbers match  ).
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Trade your Baron for a Cessna 400 Posted: 10 May 2011, 23:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8870 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Why is this not viable? Is there not enough heat? There is barely enough heat to keep my feet from freezing at 10,000ft  , I dont think there would be enough to feed a huge heat-sink like an entire leading edge. Even the VLJs that do have bleed-air dont have enough to spare to heat the wing.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|