banner
banner

12 Nov 2025, 14:04 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Trade your Baron for a Cessna 400
PostPosted: 09 May 2011, 14:08 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/14/08
Posts: 3133
Post Likes: +2674
Location: KGBR
Aircraft: D50
http://www.controller.com/listingsdetai ... 185465.htm?

Interesting ad. Kelly needs a Baron for Thermawing STC.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Trade your Baron for a Cessna 400
PostPosted: 09 May 2011, 14:09 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/18/07
Posts: 21312
Post Likes: +10659
Location: W Michigan
Aircraft: Ex PA22, P28R, V35B
Kelly is a competitor to TKS.

Kelly's approach is to use a heated wing.

_________________
Stop Continental Drift.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Trade your Baron for a Cessna 400
PostPosted: 09 May 2011, 14:35 
Offline


User avatar
 YIM  Profile




Joined: 07/12/09
Posts: 3624
Post Likes: +1192
Company: Leopold Aero, LLC
Location: KPTW Heritage Field Pottstown, PA
Aircraft: 1978 Baron E55
Interesting that it has 537 hrs on the airframe and 0 SFOH on the engine. I am sure that some Baron owner may want to consider this trade. :popcorn:

_________________
The advice you get is worth what you paid for it...
Mike Dechnik
KPTW '78 E55


Top

 Post subject: Re: Trade your Baron for a Cessna 400
PostPosted: 09 May 2011, 16:30 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8870
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
Kelly is a competitor to TKS.

Kelly's approach is to use a heated wing.


Kellys approach is to either melt the wing or at least a couple sets of 100Amp generators trying to get there :ohno: .

The 'trade' aircraft probably spent most of its life on a experimental AW certificate and had several iterations of their system put on and pulled off those wings.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Trade your Baron for a Cessna 400
PostPosted: 09 May 2011, 16:43 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/12/07
Posts: 2205
Post Likes: +500
Location: Colorado
Aircraft: '79 BE 58
The only reason I've held on to my Baron is that no one wanted to trade me their Cessna single for it.

Oh, darn. He wants a newish 58 and I have an oldish 55. Guess I'll have to keep the Baron.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Trade your Baron for a Cessna 400
PostPosted: 09 May 2011, 17:38 
Offline


User avatar
 YIM  Profile




Joined: 07/12/09
Posts: 3624
Post Likes: +1192
Company: Leopold Aero, LLC
Location: KPTW Heritage Field Pottstown, PA
Aircraft: 1978 Baron E55
Username Protected wrote:
Kelly is a competitor to TKS.

Kelly's approach is to use a heated wing.


Kellys approach is to either melt the wing or at least a couple sets of 100Amp generators trying to get there :ohno: .

The 'trade' aircraft probably spent most of its life on a experimental AW certificate and had several iterations of their system put on and pulled off those wings.


The hangar next to me has a Cessna 400 with the ThermalWing installed. It's pretty slick, no fluid to add, and then say it works well -- they pick up ice often flying back and forth to Chicago.
_________________
The advice you get is worth what you paid for it...
Mike Dechnik
KPTW '78 E55


Top

 Post subject: Re: Trade your Baron for a Cessna 400
PostPosted: 10 May 2011, 06:50 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/12/08
Posts: 334
Post Likes: +35
Location: Altadena, CA/Oakley, UT
Totally agree about the Thermawing: that was a complete disaster on my Columbia 350. That product, coupled with the delays in certification of the G1000 airplane and a hailstorm that damaged about 40 brand-new airplanes that were parked outside the manufacturing facility while waiting for G1000 certification, is pretty much the chain of events that took down Columbia as a stand-alone manufacturer. The Thermawing broke a bunch of alternator belts, killed two alternators (note that the deice system uses one stand-alone 100A alternator, and doesn't share alternators with other airplane electrical systems), went through two controllers and two sets of heaters before I gave up. Ultimately I wound up with TKS, which I like much better because (a) it works, and (b) it looks better.

The comment about having formerly had an experimental airworthiness certificate is almost certainly off base. The only experimental Columbias I know about are the Columbia 400 and Columbia 350 prototypes. The one under the link has a serial number way too far down the line for that, or even for the G1000 certification airplane.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Trade your Baron for a Cessna 400
PostPosted: 10 May 2011, 09:12 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8870
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
The comment about having formerly had an experimental airworthiness certificate is almost certainly off base. The only experimental Columbias I know about are the Columbia 400 and Columbia 350 prototypes. The one under the link has a serial number way too far down the line for that, or even for the G1000 certification airplane.


The thermawing is a STC that most definitely changes the shape of the airfoil. To get it approved, the aircraft had to be modified from its certificated specs. The only way that the aircraft was allowed to fly after the developmental thermawing panels were put on it and the point in time the STC was granted was on a 'research and development' experimental airworthiness certificate (this comes with restrictions as 'required flight crew only' ). Once the components are removed, the plane undergoes a compliance inspection to certify that it is in conformance with its original AW certificate and it goes back on that. If the STC is granted the plane also goes back on its standard AW certificate and the addition is covered under the STC.

This is different from 'experimental amateur built'.


Edit:

Just looked up the registration. I was wrong. The plane IS STILL on a experimental certificate.

Airworthiness
Classification Experimental

Category Research and Development
Crew Training
Market Survey
A/W Date 04/02/2010


It is a paperwork exercise to get it back onto its standard certifcate and presumably the seller would do that before the trade. Just something to be aware of when buying an aircraft used for R&D (and make sure the wing-numbers match ;) ).


Top

 Post subject: Re: Trade your Baron for a Cessna 400
PostPosted: 10 May 2011, 23:08 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/29/08
Posts: 194
Post Likes: +17
Location: Redmond, WA
Aircraft: Citation 501
Has anyone tried to use engine exhaust gases and a heat exchanger to circulate fluid that heats the wings? Why is this not viable? Is there not enough heat? Heat exchangers are not efficient, but considering that our engines lose 60% energy through the exhaust pipe as heat, it works out to about 57 kilowatts is dumped out of the pipe at 45% power on a IO-520. Even utilizing 10% of this energy beats a 100 amp alternator.

_________________
Sameer
KBFI
Citation 501


Top

 Post subject: Re: Trade your Baron for a Cessna 400
PostPosted: 10 May 2011, 23:39 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8870
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
Why is this not viable? Is there not enough heat?


There is barely enough heat to keep my feet from freezing at 10,000ft :D , I dont think there would be enough to feed a huge heat-sink like an entire leading edge.

Even the VLJs that do have bleed-air dont have enough to spare to heat the wing.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.sarasota.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.