27 Jan 2026, 22:45 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Adding a 172XP to our family of planes Posted: 23 Jan 2026, 21:14 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 01/21/13 Posts: 629 Post Likes: +247 Location: Eastland, TX (KETN)
Aircraft: 1968 Bonanza 36
|
|
|
I thought I’d post on here because the Cessna community relative to forums kinda sucks.
I recently purchased a 172XP to go along with our TN’d Bonanza and Cessna 150.
The 150 was purchased as a trainer for our kids. Two of our sons and one son-in-law have gotten the aviation bug from the 150. Our youngest now has nearly 400 hours flying in the 150 and I thought a more powerful platform that was still of the Cessna line would be a nice transition for him and the other two.
I did a lot of research and decided that the 172XP would be a good step-up as it is a high-performance (with the Isham STC) 210-hp airplane with mostly otherwise 172 characteristics. A little heavier on the nose than a regular 172, more torque requiring the rudder trim, and a blue knob that other 172s don’t have. It will allow our kids (with their growing families) the option of flying rather than driving places at better performance (particularly in the climb) than a 180-hp 172 and a lower operating cost than a 182.
So far, I’ve been thrilled with the airplane. It checks all the boxes I was interested in. But, I am only a novice flying it and would like some feedback from those of you who have experience with it. Particularly, what have been your performance parameters (i.e. best cruise altitude, best power settings in cruise, lean of peak settings, etc.) and what are the do’s and don’t’s that you’ve learned from flying it.
The plane didn’t have GAMI’s installed but I’ve got them on the way.
Thank you for your feedback.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Adding a 172XP to our family of planes Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 01:20 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/24/17 Posts: 1500 Post Likes: +1348
Aircraft: A36
|
|
|
There is such a thing as making things too complicated. It’s still a 172. Performance settings? WOT, 2500, ROP. Whatever changes you make to optimize things from there will make such a small difference to be negligible. It doesn’t exactly have a lot of performance to play with.
Can’t really do much wrong. A 182 would be a better choice. It’s not really more to run but a much better XC plane. Acquisition costs may be higher.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Adding a 172XP to our family of planes Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 08:54 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/20/14 Posts: 6888 Post Likes: +5100
Aircraft: V35
|
|
|
I flew 5 or 10 hours in a 172XP right after I got my PPL in a C150. Seemed like a super performer and a big aircraft to me! At the time…
There really wasn’t a need for a middle choice between a 172 and a 182, and if there were a 4 cylinder IO-360 would have been a better engine, as Cessna decided in 1996 when they restarted the production line. Like Piper did with the Archer. The 172XP has you maintaining 6 cylinders and a constant speed prop, more like a 182.
But now that the fleet exists, and 182’s are so expensive, seems like a good choice with value and performance for the dollar. It’s 182 performance with a smaller cabin.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Adding a 172XP to our family of planes Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 09:37 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/10/17 Posts: 2480 Post Likes: +1852 Company: Skyhaven Airport Inc
Aircraft: various mid century
|
|
|
Check the engine mount tubes carefully for pitting that has been painted over near the exhaust. We have had a couple that had to have the tubes replaced over the years. One someone had sanded and layered a lot of paint over the pitting to hide it. It peeled eventually and showed the damage.
Also look into the McFarlane flap roller mod to add machined washers on each side of the flap rollers. It prevents the rollers from chewing into the flap ribs.
Watch for wear on the brake lines under the gear leg fairings. Keep good bushings and shimmy damper parts in the nose strut. Stock shimmy damper works fine if kept in good shape. The solid LORD assemblies did not seem to work well in the cold. Especially if pants are installed. I have tried the new McFarlane damper but it shimmied worse than the originals with pants.
Check the lower cabin doors are not contacting and wearing the wing struts. Also put chafe tape around the struts where the inner and outer plastic fairings contact the strut.
Like any Cessna remove the interior and remove all the black CAT hose and replace with orange silicone SCAT. While your in there remove the headliner and check the condition of all the overhead fuel vent hoses and interconnects. They are often bad. Also it's a good time to check for corrosion overhead on the skins and carry thru structure.
Propeller parts might be getting a bit scarce.
Clean and treat any corrosion on the inside of the cowling. Also blow ACF-50 up in the vertical fin. We are finding those quite corroded on all Cessnas.
Don't push down on the horizontal tail to move the nose around. We have found several with cracked forward stabilizer spars out of the lightening hole in the center forward spar.
Watch for play in the elevator pushrod bolt just below the fuel selector.
I like the 172 seats better than the laid back 182 seat backs and the lighter simpler control yoke system. The XP engine has a couple oddities but it seems to work out. The STC for RPM increase helps performance also.
If you don't need the 182 width it's a good one to have. Usually the XPs were not beat to death in a school or commercial use. For many years they seemed to all have original paint/interior with high time engines and were avionics museums but hopefully that is changing.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Adding a 172XP to our family of planes Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 09:47 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/07/18 Posts: 3812 Post Likes: +2715 Company: Retired Location: Columbus, Ohio
Aircraft: Baron 58, Lear 35
|
|
|
There are comments. And then there are helpful comments. Nice work Charlie!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Adding a 172XP to our family of planes Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 10:06 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 01/21/13 Posts: 629 Post Likes: +247 Location: Eastland, TX (KETN)
Aircraft: 1968 Bonanza 36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Check the engine mount tubes carefully for pitting that has been painted over near the exhaust. We have had a couple that had to have the tubes replaced over the years. One someone had sanded and layered a lot of paint over the pitting to hide it. It peeled eventually and showed the damage.
Also look into the McFarlane flap roller mod to add machined washers on each side of the flap rollers. It prevents the rollers from chewing into the flap ribs.
Watch for wear on the brake lines under the gear leg fairings. Keep good bushings and shimmy damper parts in the nose strut. Stock shimmy damper works fine if kept in good shape. The solid LORD assemblies did not seem to work well in the cold. Especially if pants are installed. I have tried the new McFarlane damper but it shimmied worse than the originals with pants.
Check the lower cabin doors are not contacting and wearing the wing struts. Also put chafe tape around the struts where the inner and outer plastic fairings contact the strut.
Like any Cessna remove the interior and remove all the black CAT hose and replace with orange silicone SCAT. While your in there remove the headliner and check the condition of all the overhead fuel vent hoses and interconnects. They are often bad. Also it's a good time to check for corrosion overhead on the skins and carry thru structure.
Propeller parts might be getting a bit scarce.
Clean and treat any corrosion on the inside of the cowling. Also blow ACF-50 up in the vertical fin. We are finding those quite corroded on all Cessnas.
Don't push down on the horizontal tail to move the nose around. We have found several with cracked forward stabilizer spars out of the lightening hole in the center forward spar.
Watch for play in the elevator pushrod bolt just below the fuel selector.
I like the 172 seats better than the laid back 182 seat backs and the lighter simpler control yoke system. The XP engine has a couple oddities but it seems to work out. The STC for RPM increase helps performance also.
If you don't need the 182 width it's a good one to have. Usually the XPs were not beat to death in a school or commercial use. For many years they seemed to all have original paint/interior with high time engines and were avionics museums but hopefully that is changing. Wow! Thanks a lot! I was fortunate to get a very low-time 3-owner plane. It has never been used in a flight school. I have already noticed the need to install the McFarlane washers because the plane doesn’t have them. Will print out your list and work through your other recommendations.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Adding a 172XP to our family of planes Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 22:00 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/10/17 Posts: 2480 Post Likes: +1852 Company: Skyhaven Airport Inc
Aircraft: various mid century
|
|
|
Guy I like the tighter bend radius of those. How rigid are the molded ends? Are they able to conform to an oval shaped plastic duct like on the XP or 172 lower cabin vents at the door posts.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Adding a 172XP to our family of planes Posted: 25 Jan 2026, 00:22 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/06/11 Posts: 449 Post Likes: +168 Location: Grosse Ile, MI (ONZ)
Aircraft: Colemill B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: ... It’s still a 172... Actually, its lineage is the Cessna 175. Below is the Type Certificate Data Sheet list of models in TC 3A17. The model R172K is the 172XP. An interesting thread about the one-off R172J: https://eaaforums.org/showthread.php?20 ... tery-plane
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Adding a 172XP to our family of planes Posted: 25 Jan 2026, 10:08 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/07/18 Posts: 3812 Post Likes: +2715 Company: Retired Location: Columbus, Ohio
Aircraft: Baron 58, Lear 35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Actually, its lineage is the Cessna 175. Below is the Type Certificate Data Sheet list of models in TC 3A17. The model R172K is the 172XP. An interesting thread about the one-off R172J: https://eaaforums.org/showthread.php?20 ... tery-planeSure, sure. You can join the conversation using facts if you want, but that’s not how things are normally done here on BT.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Adding a 172XP to our family of planes Posted: 25 Jan 2026, 22:55 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/19/08 Posts: 1603 Post Likes: +2204 Location: Far West Texas
Aircraft: C180, GL 2T1A-2
|
|
|
We used one at my flight school when they were brought out by Cessna. My CFI's pointed out that for the meager increase in performance, the "XP" just meant "Extra Price". YMMV
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Adding a 172XP to our family of planes Posted: 25 Jan 2026, 23:35 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/03/18 Posts: 905 Post Likes: +528
Aircraft: 182P
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I thought I’d post on here because the Cessna community relative to forums kinda sucks... Probably have not tried https://www.cessna-pilots.net/CPS is a great bunch of folks, lots of great pilots and mechanics focusing on Cessna only.
_________________ http://welch.com/n46pg/
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|