banner
banner

15 Jan 2026, 12:13 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying
PostPosted: 12 Jan 2026, 19:15 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6681
Post Likes: +5992
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
I think if the Lears had been SP, the company would still be producing jets today. Time just ran away from cramped 2-pilot business jets.

SP owners would embrace a tight tube, but customers want flat floors and standup cabins. That's all they talk about these days when they launch a new one - the cabin size. They're already complaining about the upcoming G300 not having a flat floor.

_________________
"Either we heal now as a team, or we will die as individuals."


Last edited on 12 Jan 2026, 20:12, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying
PostPosted: 12 Jan 2026, 20:06 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/16/09
Posts: 7347
Post Likes: +2221
Location: Houston, TX
Aircraft: BE-TBD
Adam nailed it. Cabin and range. There is no patience in the market for small tubes with 2 big guys up front.

_________________
AI generated post. Any misrepresentation, inaccuracies or omissions not attributable to member.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying
PostPosted: 12 Jan 2026, 21:26 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/21/16
Posts: 191
Post Likes: +310
Location: KSYR
Aircraft: None currently
Username Protected wrote:
The instructor kinda set me up on the first flight, as he probably did all first timers. He briefed what I was supposed to call for, i.e. gear, flaps.

He set the power at max, just two of us in the plane. I rotated a little past VR, but under rotated, and the next thing I knew we were crossing the end of the runway doing 300 knots. He had already got the gear and flaps. :)

So then I had to pitch it up to 250 knots and got 8000 feet per minute with an assigned altitude of 10,000 feet; what a ride, faster than the speed of thought. :D

Sounds like my first ever jet takeoff in the JetStar II. Prior to the JetStar, the fastest aircraft I’d flown was a King Air B200. On my first takeoff in the JetStar II, we were about 9-10,000 lbs. under MTOW on a cool day. As soon as we were airborne, had positive rate of climb, and the gear was coming up, the instructor idled the outboard engines. In that configuration, I was able to keep up with the plane… barely.

Greg


Top

 Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2026, 04:51 
Online


 Profile




Joined: 10/07/18
Posts: 3779
Post Likes: +2686
Company: Retired
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Aircraft: Baron 58, Lear 35
Lears were fast and had a flat floor. After that, there’s not much to recommend it. Did I mention it was fast? Pretty much a one trick pony.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2026, 13:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 9133
Post Likes: +11630
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
Username Protected wrote:
I think if the Lears had been SP, the company would still be producing jets today. Time just ran away from cramped 2-pilot business jets.

SP owners would embrace a tight tube, but customers want flat floors and standup cabins. That's all they talk about these days when they launch a new one - the cabin size. They're already complaining about the upcoming G300 not having a flat floor.


Trying to make the Lear SP from the beginning might have doomed the company; as it was, 23 of the first 101 Lears built had crashed in the first 3 years. Overall 1 in 8 Lears had fatal accidents, and all those were with 2 crew.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2026, 13:40 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 9133
Post Likes: +11630
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
Username Protected wrote:
Lears were fast and had a flat floor. After that, there’s not much to recommend it. Did I mention it was fast? Pretty much a one trick pony.


When the Lear came out in 1964 all the movie stars had to have one or be seen in one. From an operator stand point, the dispatch reliability was a very strong point. Dirt simple systems , including the GE CJ-610 engines. The plane was famous for it's brakes. Our Lear 24 never let us down, nor did our 35, but the 35 was in the shop more for scheduled maintenance.

The "small tube" wasn't much of a deterrent to sales, as the Citation came out with almost exactly the same cabin dimensions and was quite successful. Cabins got bigger when buyers could justify the increased cost, but the small tube will never go away, i.e. the Citation Mustang and Cirrus Vision Jet.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2026, 16:55 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21070
Post Likes: +26512
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Overall 1 in 8 Lears had fatal accidents, and all those were with 2 crew.

If they had been single pilot, maybe half the pilots wouldn't have died.

I am reminded of the Lear at KTEB. The SIC was essentially murdered by the PIC.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2026, 17:21 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 9133
Post Likes: +11630
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
Username Protected wrote:
Overall 1 in 8 Lears had fatal accidents, and all those were with 2 crew.

If they had been single pilot, maybe half the pilots wouldn't have died.

I am reminded of the Lear at KTEB. The SIC was essentially murdered by the PIC.

Mike C.


"Murdered"

Pretty strong word. Did the PIC murder the SIC and passengers in the Statesville Citation crash?

Top

 Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2026, 19:07 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 01/24/10
Posts: 7488
Post Likes: +5200
Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
Don’t forget the Lear 24 overrun at Catalina island years ago.
Went off the end and instead of using the emergency release they tried to open normally and electric door motor ignited the fuel and all died.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2026, 20:27 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/10/17
Posts: 2467
Post Likes: +1832
Company: Skyhaven Airport Inc
Aircraft: various mid century
Out of curiosity what modern quiet engines could hypothetically work on a 23?

Same thrust and weight just quieter.

And with modern avionics and allowing single pilot how much weight could be saved?

Are the new designs better or worse if the above items were changed.

Would the early Lear have more useful load, better range, simpler systems than a Phenom or Citation.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2026, 21:10 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6681
Post Likes: +5992
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
I always thought there'd be a whole cottage industry and slew of STC's upgrading old jets to SP. The Beech 400, the Lears, the IAI Westwinds etc would all be good candidates. In my mind, you'd just re-certify the STC based on a completely new panel, move critical items to the pilots side, lean a bit more on automation and voila - Bob's your uncle. I don't see why it couldn't be done.

But obviously, none of that has happened, so there has to be a reason.

_________________
"Either we heal now as a team, or we will die as individuals."


Top

 Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2026, 22:11 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/27/16
Posts: 2404
Post Likes: +4086
Aircraft: B17,18,24,25,29,58,
Username Protected wrote:
Out of curiosity what modern quiet engines could hypothetically work on a 23?

Same thrust and weight just quieter.

And with modern avionics and allowing single pilot how much weight could be saved?

Are the new designs better or worse if the above items were changed.

Would the early Lear have more useful load, better range, simpler systems than a Phenom or Citation.


A few years back I gave several pilots a proficiency check in a Lear 25 equipped with a pair of Williams FJ44-2C turbofans in Guthrie, OK.

It was very fuel efficient and an interesting project, but not simply an engine swap. The pylons had to be relocated and several important things moved around in the back end. Had it been done much earlier it might have resurrected many old airframes.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2026, 22:19 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/27/16
Posts: 2404
Post Likes: +4086
Aircraft: B17,18,24,25,29,58,
Username Protected wrote:
I always thought there'd be a whole cottage industry and slew of STC's upgrading old jets to SP. The Beech 400, the Lears, the IAI Westwinds etc would all be good candidates. In my mind, you'd just re-certify the STC based on a completely new panel, move critical items to the pilots side, lean a bit more on automation and voila - Bob's your uncle. I don't see why it couldn't be done.

But obviously, none of that has happened, so there has to be a reason.


It would be infinitely easier to single-handedly shove about 9 yards of wet string up a very angry wildcat's rectum than get all those airplanes you mentioned modified and certified for single pilot operations. If you really, really wanted to do the string thing at least it is remotely possible. :rock:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2026, 23:10 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 04/16/11
Posts: 6513
Post Likes: +8976
Company: Buddy's Best Bargains
Location: Burlington, NC
Aircraft: V35B
It's nice and all, and it waxes poetic, but IMO It's not a true Lear 23 if you can't hear it taking off from a few miles away and see a plume of black smoke trailing. :peace: :pilot: :rock:

_________________
Matt
336-266-3105


Top

 Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2026, 23:37 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/17/15
Posts: 976
Post Likes: +575
Company: DebrisTech
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Aircraft: KA350i, 350, B200
Username Protected wrote:

It would be infinitely easier to single-handedly shove about 9 yards of wet string up a very angry wildcat's rectum than get all those airplanes you mentioned modified and certified for single pilot operations. If you really, really wanted to do the string thing at least it is remotely possible. :rock:



:bugeye: :coffee: :lol: :rofl:


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



PlaneAC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.Plane Salon Beechtalk.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.ElectroairTile.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.