15 Jan 2026, 12:13 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying Posted: 12 Jan 2026, 21:26 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/21/16 Posts: 191 Post Likes: +310 Location: KSYR
Aircraft: None currently
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The instructor kinda set me up on the first flight, as he probably did all first timers. He briefed what I was supposed to call for, i.e. gear, flaps. He set the power at max, just two of us in the plane. I rotated a little past VR, but under rotated, and the next thing I knew we were crossing the end of the runway doing 300 knots. He had already got the gear and flaps. So then I had to pitch it up to 250 knots and got 8000 feet per minute with an assigned altitude of 10,000 feet; what a ride, faster than the speed of thought.  Sounds like my first ever jet takeoff in the JetStar II. Prior to the JetStar, the fastest aircraft I’d flown was a King Air B200. On my first takeoff in the JetStar II, we were about 9-10,000 lbs. under MTOW on a cool day. As soon as we were airborne, had positive rate of climb, and the gear was coming up, the instructor idled the outboard engines. In that configuration, I was able to keep up with the plane… barely. Greg
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying Posted: 13 Jan 2026, 04:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/07/18 Posts: 3779 Post Likes: +2686 Company: Retired Location: Columbus, Ohio
Aircraft: Baron 58, Lear 35
|
|
|
Lears were fast and had a flat floor. After that, there’s not much to recommend it. Did I mention it was fast? Pretty much a one trick pony.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying Posted: 13 Jan 2026, 13:28 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/28/17 Posts: 9133 Post Likes: +11630 Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I think if the Lears had been SP, the company would still be producing jets today. Time just ran away from cramped 2-pilot business jets.
SP owners would embrace a tight tube, but customers want flat floors and standup cabins. That's all they talk about these days when they launch a new one - the cabin size. They're already complaining about the upcoming G300 not having a flat floor. Trying to make the Lear SP from the beginning might have doomed the company; as it was, 23 of the first 101 Lears built had crashed in the first 3 years. Overall 1 in 8 Lears had fatal accidents, and all those were with 2 crew.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying Posted: 13 Jan 2026, 13:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/28/17 Posts: 9133 Post Likes: +11630 Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Lears were fast and had a flat floor. After that, there’s not much to recommend it. Did I mention it was fast? Pretty much a one trick pony. When the Lear came out in 1964 all the movie stars had to have one or be seen in one. From an operator stand point, the dispatch reliability was a very strong point. Dirt simple systems , including the GE CJ-610 engines. The plane was famous for it's brakes. Our Lear 24 never let us down, nor did our 35, but the 35 was in the shop more for scheduled maintenance. The "small tube" wasn't much of a deterrent to sales, as the Citation came out with almost exactly the same cabin dimensions and was quite successful. Cabins got bigger when buyers could justify the increased cost, but the small tube will never go away, i.e. the Citation Mustang and Cirrus Vision Jet.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying Posted: 13 Jan 2026, 16:55 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21070 Post Likes: +26512 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Overall 1 in 8 Lears had fatal accidents, and all those were with 2 crew. If they had been single pilot, maybe half the pilots wouldn't have died. I am reminded of the Lear at KTEB. The SIC was essentially murdered by the PIC. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying Posted: 13 Jan 2026, 17:21 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/28/17 Posts: 9133 Post Likes: +11630 Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Overall 1 in 8 Lears had fatal accidents, and all those were with 2 crew. If they had been single pilot, maybe half the pilots wouldn't have died. I am reminded of the Lear at KTEB. The SIC was essentially murdered by the PIC. Mike C.
"Murdered"
Pretty strong word. Did the PIC murder the SIC and passengers in the Statesville Citation crash?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying Posted: 13 Jan 2026, 20:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/10/17 Posts: 2467 Post Likes: +1832 Company: Skyhaven Airport Inc
Aircraft: various mid century
|
|
|
Out of curiosity what modern quiet engines could hypothetically work on a 23?
Same thrust and weight just quieter.
And with modern avionics and allowing single pilot how much weight could be saved?
Are the new designs better or worse if the above items were changed. Would the early Lear have more useful load, better range, simpler systems than a Phenom or Citation.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying Posted: 13 Jan 2026, 21:10 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6681 Post Likes: +5992 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
|
I always thought there'd be a whole cottage industry and slew of STC's upgrading old jets to SP. The Beech 400, the Lears, the IAI Westwinds etc would all be good candidates. In my mind, you'd just re-certify the STC based on a completely new panel, move critical items to the pilots side, lean a bit more on automation and voila - Bob's your uncle. I don't see why it couldn't be done.
But obviously, none of that has happened, so there has to be a reason.
_________________ "Either we heal now as a team, or we will die as individuals."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying Posted: 13 Jan 2026, 22:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/27/16 Posts: 2404 Post Likes: +4086
Aircraft: B17,18,24,25,29,58,
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Out of curiosity what modern quiet engines could hypothetically work on a 23?
Same thrust and weight just quieter.
And with modern avionics and allowing single pilot how much weight could be saved?
Are the new designs better or worse if the above items were changed. Would the early Lear have more useful load, better range, simpler systems than a Phenom or Citation. A few years back I gave several pilots a proficiency check in a Lear 25 equipped with a pair of Williams FJ44-2C turbofans in Guthrie, OK. It was very fuel efficient and an interesting project, but not simply an engine swap. The pylons had to be relocated and several important things moved around in the back end. Had it been done much earlier it might have resurrected many old airframes.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Only Lear 23 still flying Posted: 13 Jan 2026, 22:19 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/27/16 Posts: 2404 Post Likes: +4086
Aircraft: B17,18,24,25,29,58,
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I always thought there'd be a whole cottage industry and slew of STC's upgrading old jets to SP. The Beech 400, the Lears, the IAI Westwinds etc would all be good candidates. In my mind, you'd just re-certify the STC based on a completely new panel, move critical items to the pilots side, lean a bit more on automation and voila - Bob's your uncle. I don't see why it couldn't be done.
But obviously, none of that has happened, so there has to be a reason. It would be infinitely easier to single-handedly shove about 9 yards of wet string up a very angry wildcat's rectum than get all those airplanes you mentioned modified and certified for single pilot operations. If you really, really wanted to do the string thing at least it is remotely possible. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|