banner
banner

19 Jun 2025, 15:47 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Straight wing Citation landing decent angle
PostPosted: 09 Jun 2025, 19:41 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 5195
Post Likes: +5207
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
I routinely go into a 2900ft mountain strip (at 4,400 feet) with my 501. Yes, I'm ALWAYS puckered up but I've never scared myself. I think your strip is fine.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Straight wing Citation landing decent angle
PostPosted: 13 Jun 2025, 17:50 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/15/17
Posts: 1106
Post Likes: +575
Company: Cessna (retired)
Username Protected wrote:
It appears close. If they are able to do the Aspen approach at 6.5 degrees and worst case I need 7.5 to be straight in capable. But if making a turning approach less angle is workable. Normally I do fly a downwind or upwind to look over the airport and check wind direction.
(No weather reporting yet) I have not found where there is a landing configuration descent angle chart or data with weights. Max angle landing configuration at 1000ft per min is probably a good reference.

Two panel flaps, range, reversers, takeoff performance and possibility of Garmin equipment installation seems to rule out the others except the V .

Compared to my current airplane The Citation V appears to have less or no time of exposure where continuing after a power loss on takeoff is not possible. Depending on takeoff loading, wind, temp etc. The Kingair is more forgiving of approach and landing variables. Winds, conditions, surfaces.

More things to consider before getting really serious but it appears possible.


Part 25 regulations or Part 23 Citation Special Conditions require the capability to either continue the takeoff or stop with an engine failure at any point


Top

 Post subject: Re: Straight wing Citation landing decent angle
PostPosted: 14 Jun 2025, 08:58 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/10/17
Posts: 2210
Post Likes: +1588
Company: Skyhaven Airport Inc
Aircraft: various mid century
Yes and from what I see from Mikes V numbers it can work most of the time respecting conditions. Less fuel weight is an option I can use for certain trips and load up at the next airport or make a stop.

Trouble with single pilot single airplane corporate flying is there is never someone looking over to tell you NO. It takes a lot of discipline to do it right.

501 below. I don't think anything special listed for the V because it is Part 25.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documen ... nce-flight


Top

 Post subject: Re: Straight wing Citation landing decent angle
PostPosted: 14 Jun 2025, 18:51 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8363
Post Likes: +10552
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
Username Protected wrote:
I have a short strip (3100 ft) with mountains around the pattern.

Specifics would help, airport ID?

Quote:
Of the various single pilot versions of the Citation with reversers what one makes the best full flap steep visual descents to normal flare and landing.

3100 ft is enough for many Citations at reasonable landing weights.

At 0 MSL, ISA, my V can land in 2870 ft at *max* landing weight of 15,200 lbs, and that is with it touching down 1000 ft past the threshold and not using the reversers. If you reduce TCH to, say, 15 ft, and use reversers, you can be under 2000 ft.

For a more normal landing weight of, say, 11,500 lbs, distance is 2230 ft.

Takeoff is more limiting, but not by much. 0 MSL, ISA, 3100 ft supports 15,700 lbs, only 200 lbs under max. A more comfortable weight of 14,000 lbs is 2510 ft. These distances are with an engine failure at V1 then climbing to 35 ft AGL, which takes about 1000 ft of runway that you overfly.

Both the landing and takeoff numbers include about 1000 ft of runway you don't touch. Another way to say that is your ground roll will be 1000 ft less than the book numbers. So the numbers do have some margins in them.

Quote:
Just steep approach with turns to very short final, flare and land with minimum floating.

Like the approach I have to do into KSGS runway 34 and not get into KSTP class D?

Attachment:
ksgs-rwy34-final.png

You only got about 4000 ft of room to make that turn and land on a relatively short runway of 4000 ft, so that require moderate banking and speed control to make it work.

Quote:
Yes steeper than a normal ILS and not stabilized.

It is worth noting that "unstabilized" is not the same as "not under control". Those get confused sometimes.

Stabilized is meeting some numerical criteria, usually 1000 ft AGL on path on speed. You can be outside those numbers and still be in full control on your intended path.

Most circling approaches, if you circle at minimums, don't meet stabilized approach criteria, for example, and that is similar to the situation of making a tight turn to final close to the ground.

Mike C.


Your mention of stabilized is somewhat creative, and acknowledges the generally accepted criteria as on speed, on flight path, on sink rate within 500 or 1000 feet above the runway on final approach..You shouldn't need to address maneuvering for the approach or compare that to a stabilized approach. For your approach with 4000 feet of maneuvering room, if you have the criteria met by no lower than 500 feet it's a stabilized approach, if you don't, it's not a stabilized approach.

A steep ILS can be flown stabilized, with a higher than normal steady sink rate not varying with speed and glide path.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Straight wing Citation landing decent angle
PostPosted: 16 Jun 2025, 16:32 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/25/16
Posts: 1924
Post Likes: +1576
Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
Username Protected wrote:
I find this to be a very strange question. I would not recommend ever landing from an unstabilized approach.

KHND in Las Vegas isn't exactly stabilized when landing south...the tower clears you for a 2 mile base due to the Bravo airspace. It's a little tight at jet speeds but it works.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Straight wing Citation landing decent angle
PostPosted: 16 Jun 2025, 17:45 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/10/17
Posts: 2210
Post Likes: +1588
Company: Skyhaven Airport Inc
Aircraft: various mid century
I see the new Pilatus Pro order sheet has a "Steep Approach Capability" option for approaches up to 8 degrees. Are there any in the US with that angle?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Straight wing Citation landing decent angle
PostPosted: 16 Jun 2025, 18:23 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20354
Post Likes: +25524
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I see the new Pilatus Pro order sheet has a "Steep Approach Capability" option for approaches up to 8 degrees. Are there any in the US with that angle?

They will all be declared circling approaches.

Consider:

https://aeronav.faa.gov/d-tpp/2506/06404RE.PDF

7.75 degrees to KSBS.

Can my V do that? Maybe with gear, full flaps, and speedbrakes. I know the V was approved for London City. I should try and see what angle I do get.

I have landed straight in at KSBS, in the MU2.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2



PWI, Inc. (Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.