19 Jun 2025, 17:48 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 03 Jun 2025, 00:56 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/15/17 Posts: 1106 Post Likes: +575 Company: Cessna (retired)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yes it it is stupid. And King Air power control cables never brake anyway. There may be some liability concerns that if they change it they are admitting fault. Which is even more stupid. Only the brake cables brake.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 03 Jun 2025, 03:59 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/09/13 Posts: 519 Post Likes: +700 Location: Ballarat, Australia
Aircraft: C177rg
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yes it it is stupid. And King Air power control cables never brake anyway. There may be some liability concerns that if they change it they are admitting fault. Which is even more stupid. Only the brake cables brake.
Very clever.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 03 Jun 2025, 07:04 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/24/13 Posts: 9776 Post Likes: +4571 Company: Aviation Tools / CCX Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Ironically, if Pratt had placed the fuel controllers on the other side of the engines, the engine affected would be the non-critical engine. Simpler solution, equal length cables.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 03 Jun 2025, 08:18 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/29/10 Posts: 2761 Post Likes: +2605 Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Flaps are not typically used for takeoffs in King Airs. There is only minimal benefits on short runways. Not a pilot, and certainly not a King Air pilot, but I thought approach flaps were normal for take-off?
Not for a King Air.
For other airframes it depends on the airframe and type of flaps. In either case, gear comes up first then flaps (your post said flaps then gear).
Robert
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 04 Jun 2025, 23:55 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/31/11 Posts: 1129 Post Likes: +708 Company: B777, 767, 757, 727, MD11, S80 Location: Colorado Springs
Aircraft: Thrush S2R, AC500B,
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I left out of a 3,480' runway in Florida (KLNA) on Saturday with 4 adults and 2 kids, and 300lbs of bags in a Citation. We came nonstop to KMWL (1,030miles) in 3:00 hours. Will your plane do that? Yes, MY PIAGGIO near full gross in 30C temps would rotate just under 3,000 feet and complete trip in about 3hr and 20 minutes (Dallas STAR taking 10 more mins) at FL360 burning about 2,000 pounds. I fly into and out of LNA when going to Flight Safety sometimes and would NEVER depart that short a runway that heavy. I would depart West Palm or Stuart. With my customer base NOT having a jet is a plus. 390 knots FL300 yessirreeBOB Having a 5'10" cabin and small wing that laughs at turbulence Challengers are complaining about...another plus X TU 6,000 foot cabin round 39,000 feet- one more plus Last week burning 78 gph while cruising 360 True at FL400 (yes, I was light) and grinning-another plus. reverse thrust- fully acrobatic yep bleed air anti ice makes me laugh every time I see ice on wing- 1 more full stand up lav-plus OH, wait for it.....nothing ever breaks. I am so SO glad most were afraid of this airplane and I got it for 70% discount.  Can it use a gravel RW?
_________________ Dan F Indecision is the key to flexibility
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 05 Jun 2025, 07:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/10/17 Posts: 2210 Post Likes: +1588 Company: Skyhaven Airport Inc
Aircraft: various mid century
|
|
Chip mentioned the new auto throttles fixing the risk of Kingair PLM.
In a post a few months ago it was mentioned that if the friction locks are not set correctly the new Autothrottles will hunt up and down 500 ft lbs on approach to land. Not ideal.
Seems like we have made a new problem on top of an old one. Or a new problem to not admit there was a problem with the old "Fix".
I remember having a set of throttles and mixture cables on my 421 that were getting sloppy. You had to move the levers a ways to get any response (multiple clicks on the mixtures). So major project we changed all the cables to new McFarlane PMA cables.
Sadly I found the internal slop was worse after the new cables were installed than with the original cables I had removed. Springs might have helped but none were called for. Plus with only one friction lock for all levers on a Cessna quadrant it would not have worked out to have return springs.
Funny story about PLM. I was taking off with a load of jumpers in the old Twin Beech. As I started the takeoff roll it was about time for the tail to come up and I found I did not have enough down trim rolled in. (No indicator and 11 instead of 8 fat jumpers). So I let go of the throttles to reach down below/behind the seat to the elevator trim wheel. The worn friction lock allowed the left throttle to fall back at just that moment. 50ft wide X 2000ft runway and big crosswind from the left... So with left arm locked holding full down elevator I was trying to ease the throttle back up and get the lock a bit tighter to be able to reach down to the trim again. With the high noise level the jumper next to me just was looking like "What is this idiot doing"? Throttle, Push lock, trim, throttle, Push lock, trim. GEAR! Throttles props Trim getting closer. I was a busy one armed man for a bit.
That was way worse than times when I had the left lever rolling back after takeoff in the 90 or 200 BUT I knew what the problem was. If coming down from Jets and a person is used to taking their hand off the power levers at V1. It's a bad thing in a Kingair. You need a hand on the power levers to catch if one starts to get too high ITT or torque rise with ram air. It's not much but just a little tweak back sometimes is needed. Pilot stuff. No different than a Twin turbo Cessna.
If your aware what MIGHT happen then you are spring loaded to look for this if it does happen. But until the sims are rigged to train for the possibility and how the rudder boost feels in the pedals then we won't fix it.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 05 Jun 2025, 08:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/06/14 Posts: 3788 Post Likes: +2614 Location: MA
Aircraft: Cessna 340A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I remember having a set of throttles and mixture cables on my 421 that were getting sloppy. You had to move the levers a ways to get any response (multiple clicks on the mixtures). So major project we changed all the cables to new McFarlane PMA cables.
Sadly I found the internal slop was worse after the new cables were installed than with the original cables I had removed. Springs might have helped but none were called for. Plus with only one friction lock for all levers on a Cessna quadrant it would not have worked out to have return springs. 2-3 clicks of hysteresis is "normal". It's annoying, but the solution is to only adjust in one direction (lean). If you undershoot, you have to go back up a few clicks and then try again. Trick is getting the friction lock tight enough that you can find spots in-between detents.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 05 Jun 2025, 09:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/31/11 Posts: 1129 Post Likes: +708 Company: B777, 767, 757, 727, MD11, S80 Location: Colorado Springs
Aircraft: Thrush S2R, AC500B,
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My buddy Mike likes to turn every thread into a Citation V thread, I suggested he start this thread, but he’s more of a follower than a leader… so here it goes.
(standby for criticism of how many threads I start)
There are two aircraft that have very similar passenger and range capabilities, the Citation V and the King Air 350, I actually prefer the V over the 350, I think it is more airplane for the money, assuming it fits your mission and you’re ok with the slightly higher operating cost, but to defer to Mike C., I’ll take the weaker position in this debate and defend the King Air. LOL the Piaggio beats both in comfort, economy, quietness and looks (just sayin') Looks? There is always a guy around that likes fat chicks, I’ve heard they need love too. Carry on!  Attachment: IMG_6544.jpeg
_________________ Dan F Indecision is the key to flexibility
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 07 Jun 2025, 12:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/12 Posts: 4878 Post Likes: +5521 Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: As far as I know the sims still don’t even have springs on the power levers. The most recent one I trained in did not.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 08 Jun 2025, 10:30 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 08/10/16 Posts: 300 Post Likes: +141 Location: Jackson, MS (MBO)
Aircraft: 2010 King Air 350
|
|
Username Protected wrote: As far as I know the sims still don’t even have springs on the power levers. The most recent one I trained in did not.
FlightSafety in Atlanta has had the springs on them for 3 years and talk about them in ground school.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 08 Jun 2025, 11:32 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20354 Post Likes: +25524 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: FlightSafety in Atlanta has had the springs on them for 3 years and talk about them in ground school. Atlanta has King Airs? I didn't see one in the sim hall. It was all jets. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 08 Jun 2025, 11:44 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/28/11 Posts: 1367 Post Likes: +600
Aircraft: V35A, B300
|
|
Username Protected wrote: FlightSafety in Atlanta has had the springs on them for 3 years and talk about them in ground school. Atlanta has King Airs? I didn't see one in the sim hall. It was all jets. Mike C.
Yes. A 200 Sim, 350 Proline 21 and a 350 fusion sim.
https://www.flightsafety.com/locations/ ... ng-center/
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|