banner
banner

21 Jun 2025, 10:53 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2025, 13:09 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/06/14
Posts: 255
Post Likes: +772
Location: 7KS9
Aircraft: C140, PA24-260C
I think you are talking past each other. The objective isn't to get a modern autopilot to work WITH the Primus; the objective is to have a modern autopilot available so the Primus can be ripped out and replaced with Garmin.

Therefore, the AP doesn't need to work with the Primus. It just needs to exist so there is a path to a full avionics retrofit, both AP and radios/nav/EFIS.

This is back to the irony that Genesys getting their autopilot done will increase Garmin sales elsewhere on the panel.

Phil


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2025, 13:20 
Online



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/21/08
Posts: 5755
Post Likes: +7146
Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
Username Protected wrote:
I think you are talking past each other. The objective isn't to get a modern autopilot to work WITH the Primus; the objective is to have a modern autopilot available so the Primus can be ripped out and replaced with Garmin.

Therefore, the AP doesn't need to work with the Primus. It just needs to exist so there is a path to a full avionics retrofit, both AP and radios/nav/EFIS.

This is back to the irony that Genesys getting their autopilot done will increase Garmin sales elsewhere on the panel.

Phil

Yes, two separate issues. Genesys wants to make their autopilot work with the Primus system as a stand alone solution. They are already integrated into the G600 system with the V, so that will be an easy switch when and if Jet Tech gets approval to remove the Primus 1000 system.

_________________
I'm just here for the free snacks


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2025, 13:53 
Online



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/21/08
Posts: 5755
Post Likes: +7146
Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
I did get clarification on the integration. The Garmin system does provide heading and altitude preselect functions to the Genesys autopilot, but it will not accept annunciation information, so there is a small panel above the PFD that shows those indications. Not a big deal at all, and I actually never liked Garmin's scoreboard anyway, it was just too cluttered.
By having a stand alone annunciator, the information is much more clear and concise.
As for the Primus 1000, there will likely never be a Genesys solution for that. Garmin will release their autopilot and avionics suite as a single package for those airframes, and it most likely would not be economically feasible for a third party to get access to that solution.

_________________
I'm just here for the free snacks


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2025, 13:53 
Online



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8057
Post Likes: +10384
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
With the recent upgrade to the CJ4, all of the new Textron jets now have Garmin, so they’re good.

There’s such a gap between new and legacy aircraft that we typically see two very different buyers / mindsets.

I don’t see any effect from legacy aircraft on new and I think you may see softness in the market for late model CJ4’s since the new ones are Garmin, but even then, most CJ4’s are pro flown, so the owner doesn’t typically care about the panel and some of the pilots prefer PL21.

I'm curious, Chip, if the original question is the reason why the G1000 STC for the original CitationJet just.... died out. My understanding was that it was a game-changer for that airframe but they only converted about ~30 of them then just stopped. Was it a threat to the M2 or something?


The STC is held by Textron and they have orphaned it. The general consensus is that they did so intentionally to protect sales of the M2 and CJ3+ and that may be the case.

I would not be surprised to discover there's actually more to it than that.

I actually think that having the G1000NXi available for all 525's would help new sales for the very reasons Mike C stated. If Textron brought the STC back and only offered it through their service centers it would be a heck of a revenue stream.

Two likely issues from Textron's viewpoint, they're selling all the new airplanes they can build anyway and they don't have the capacity in their service network to install multiple G1000's.
_________________
Winners don’t whine.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2025, 14:10 
Online


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20364
Post Likes: +25541
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Genesys wants to make their autopilot work with the Primus system as a stand alone solution.

Completely wasted effort.

Nobody wants that.

What people want is to remove Primus 1000 entirely. The only missing piece is a new autopilot, everything else is already available assuming Jettech or Blackhawk extend their STCs to cover the Primus planes, which should be pretty easy.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2025, 14:18 
Online



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/21/08
Posts: 5755
Post Likes: +7146
Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
Username Protected wrote:
Genesys wants to make their autopilot work with the Primus system as a stand alone solution.

Completely wasted effort.

Nobody wants that.

What people want is to remove Primus 1000 entirely. The only missing piece is a new autopilot, everything else is already available assuming Jettech or Blackhawk extend their STCs to cover the Primus planes, which should be pretty easy.

Mike C.

Yes, I corrected my statement in my last post.
_________________
I'm just here for the free snacks


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2025, 14:47 
Online


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20364
Post Likes: +25541
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
As for the Primus 1000, there will likely never be a Genesys solution for that. Garmin will release their autopilot and avionics suite as a single package for those airframes, and it most likely would not be economically feasible for a third party to get access to that solution.

Genesys needs to partner with Jettech or Blackhawk so their STCs get expanded to Ultra and Encore in conjunction with the Genesys autopilot. Then the Genesys autopilot does become a viable Primus 1000 replacement option.

I was under the impression Jettech was involved with Genesys at one time, but that seems to have broken down. That's bad news for both companies so they should figure out how to proceed together.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2025, 16:32 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/15/17
Posts: 85
Post Likes: +29

The STC is held by Textron and they have orphaned it. The general consensus is that they did so intentionally to protect sales of the M2 and CJ3+ and that may be the case.



This. Remember Ron's got a boss too and job #1 of any public company is Return Value to Shareholders, NOT do what's best for the community.

https://investor.textron.com/investors/ ... fault.aspx

He's just head of a business unit, it may not even be 100% within his discretion. And the parent company is pretty stodgy/ripe for disruption if the Govt/FAA ever allowed it.

You can vote with your wallet, I hope they figure out their best customers are existing customers and the right thing for a community can also be the best for shareholders.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2025, 18:40 
Online



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8057
Post Likes: +10384
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
I think both Mike C. and yours truly deserve a little handclap for being 3 pages in with no arguments breaking out.

:clap:

_________________
Winners don’t whine.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2025, 20:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/28/21
Posts: 105
Post Likes: +66
Company: Charwood Partners
Username Protected wrote:
I think both Mike C. and yours truly deserve a little handclap for being 3 pages in with no arguments breaking out.

:clap:

We like it when mom and dad fight though...we all learn stuff.

:duck: :duck:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4
PostPosted: 28 Jan 2025, 23:44 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/04/13
Posts: 2732
Post Likes: +1360
Location: Little Rock, Ar
Aircraft: A36 C560 C551 C560XL
Username Protected wrote:
I think both Mike C. and yours truly deserve a little handclap for being 3 pages in with no arguments breaking out.

:clap:



I was just thinking that. Congratulations guys.

I also heard that maybe Garmin was working on a STC to use the G3000 to replace the Primus avionics in Ultras, Bravos, and Encores.

Robert T


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2025, 00:00 
Online



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8057
Post Likes: +10384
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
I think both Mike C. and yours truly deserve a little handclap for being 3 pages in with no arguments breaking out.

:clap:

We like it when mom and dad fight though...we all learn stuff.

:duck: :duck:


Son, as your father, I’m trying to do better. Otherwise your mom may leave us again.
_________________
Winners don’t whine.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4
PostPosted: 30 Jan 2025, 20:54 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/03/10
Posts: 1561
Post Likes: +1809
Company: D&M Leasing Houston
Location: Katy, TX (KTME)
Aircraft: CitationV/C180
Any word on the V Nav function on the Citation V with Jet tech panels?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4
PostPosted: 30 Jan 2025, 20:56 
Online



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/21/08
Posts: 5755
Post Likes: +7146
Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
Username Protected wrote:
Any word on the V Nav function on the Citation V with Jet tech panels?

Works flawlessly with the Genesys 5100 autopilot.

_________________
I'm just here for the free snacks


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4
PostPosted: 02 Apr 2025, 17:21 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/02/14
Posts: 33
Post Likes: +17
Username Protected wrote:
The Garmin system does provide heading and altitude preselect functions to the Genesys autopilot, but it will not accept annunciation information, so there is a small panel above the PFD that shows those indications.


Has anyone heard any update on the Genesys autopilot for the 500 series?


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



PWI, Inc. (Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.