25 Jun 2025, 15:24 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 23 Nov 2022, 15:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/05/09 Posts: 4348 Post Likes: +3134 Location: Raleigh, NC
Aircraft: L-39
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Went from a Baron 58 to a TBM 10 years ago, never looked back. Mine as over 800 ibs with full fuel. Its essentially a 4 passenger aircraft with 1400 nm range. yep... nearly identical. we have 806lbs available with full fuel, but we never need full fuel. I've done a 1550nm leg going west (although it was slow), and a 1050 going west with 85kts headwind.
_________________ "Find worthy causes in your life."
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 30 Nov 2022, 17:02 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/21/17 Posts: 2194 Post Likes: +2995 Location: Arkansas
Aircraft: Piper Aztec
|
|
Username Protected wrote: TBM was easy transition from a Mooney. Few more systems but aircraft handled very similarly in all flight regimes. It's almost as if the "M" in "TBM" stands for "Mooney"...
I thought it stood for Money?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 01 Dec 2022, 00:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/15/21 Posts: 2989 Post Likes: +1547
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's almost as if the "M" in "TBM" stands for "Mooney"... I thought it stood for Money? In French it must be "Très Beaucoup Monnaie".
_________________ Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 11 Jan 2023, 01:09 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/26/22 Posts: 101 Post Likes: +30 Location: XQU Qualicum
Aircraft: Bonanza
|
|
I have pretty limited experience in bigger planes, and no turbine time, so not much to add to the conversation, other than to add the Chieftain. I enjoyed my time flying it.
That said, I am looking at an M350 for the pressurization, and long fuel range.
_________________ WTB Piper M350 with G1000 NXI, and no damage history. If selling one please contact me.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 10 Jan 2025, 19:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/31/11 Posts: 1129 Post Likes: +708 Company: B777, 767, 757, 727, MD11, S80 Location: Colorado Springs
Aircraft: Thrush S2R, AC500B,
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That's messed up. Must not have talked to the right folks. Mike, curious where you think insurance should be first year on a 501sp and a king air 90 in this situation? Then50k sounded high…[/quote] My insurance for my 501 Eagle II was $22k for $800k Hull. I have 1500TT and had no turbine or Jet. Then I had to change to another company that allowed dry leasing. Then it went to $35k annually. The training is the same time for most planes like PA46 or 421 that have insurance required training. The only difference is they charge a lot more for jet training. Even though it takes the same amount of time. My 421 was $4500 for initial and the 501 is $15k. Both the same process and in my plane. Maintenance cost for first year of 501 has been less than my PA46 and 421. Sure it cost more to fly a jet. But it’s way safer and much more comfortable. Right now JetA is expensive so it hurts. But when I got my 501 it was average $3.50 gallon and trip cost was about the same as my 421 burning 100LL. If you can afford it there is no reason to not fly a jet. Mike[/quote] “ If you can afford it there is no reason to not fly a jet”. If your aunt had balls she’d be your uncle, well maybe not today. How about field length at smaller airports, back country and grass?
_________________ Dan F Indecision is the key to flexibility
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 10 Jan 2025, 23:03 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/24/19 Posts: 189 Post Likes: +72 Location: Central NY, (N03)
Aircraft: 421C
|
|
Todd,
If you’re looking for more room, useful load, keeping your speed+ and prefer to remain piston powered, I’d recommend the 1976-79 Cessna 421C. 1980-85 models came with trailing link gear but Cessna didn’t change the gross weight, so you lose a little over 100# of UL with those models. I have a 78 and with full mains (203 useable), I can carry 1100#. Frequently fly in the flight levels and truing out at about 209kts. (8900’ cabin at FL250). Two relief tubes for the guys (game changer) and a sit down potty for the gals. Pressurization, A/C and FIKI another couple of game changers. Your family will love it and so will you. Don’t fear the geared engines either. Plenty of them for sale to choose from - just have to find the right one.. Like any aircraft - Maintenance is, well, it’s maintenance. Find one that is flown regularly. Those are the ones that are maintained. Avoid the ones that have been sitting for who knows how long, (Unless you’re interested in a project). Regularly flown aircraft seem to be project enough for anyone.
Your flight time experience would certainly make you insurable in one and the training is not difficult. They fly very nicely on one engine too.
Personally, I’d probably move up to TP or even a 501 if I could afford it.. I believe the 425 would be a perfect fit for me. But, it’s just not in the cards.. I’m happy to have what I have.
Good luck with whatever you choose to buy! John
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 14 Jan 2025, 15:38 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/15/17 Posts: 85 Post Likes: +29
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I will always advocate for a Citation Mustang if the budget and mission allows. We just picked our managed 510 up from West Star from its annual maintenance event and its nearly identical to what I spend in my 58P in mx. Wow, that seems low. I've always figured a Mustang is about $1500/hr to run all in, with an M2 being closer to $2200. Am i off by more than 15%?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 14 Jan 2025, 15:54 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/08/13 Posts: 549 Post Likes: +313 Company: Citation Jet Exchange Location: St. Louis
Aircraft: 58P C510 C525 Excel
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I will always advocate for a Citation Mustang if the budget and mission allows. We just picked our managed 510 up from West Star from its annual maintenance event and its nearly identical to what I spend in my 58P in mx. Wow, that seems low. I've always figured a Mustang is about $1500/hr to run all in, with an M2 being closer to $2200. Am i off by more than 15%?
With that statement comes a lot of room for variability. This year we spent about $30k on maintenance, all in on the Mustang, with the majority of that work done at West Star. The most we've spent on our Mustang in the past 8 years was $42k in mx, the least about $12k.
I never was a fan of "all in" numbers as they vary so much depending on your hangar cost, experience level/hull value affecting insurance, and how much or little you fly the plane.
From A to B the plane costs about $900/hr to run for fuel at $5/gal and engines at $420/hr.
Insurance/mx/training will vary year to year and depends on your preferences.
The M2 we had averaged around $30k-$40k in mx but it was a newer plane and it flew a lot. The older 525s we see $40k-60k as an average in mx annually.
Then of course the engine programs. Which one? On one at all? Etc. The Mustang and M2 are nearly identical right now for a top tier program at $420-$480/hr depending on your contract year.
There is a 30-40gph split between the two jets depending on how you fly (short flights vs long, high vs low). On long flights we'd block 119gph in the M2, 90GPH in the mustang, a little higher for average length flights.
_________________ The Citation Jet Exchange www.CitationJetX.com CJs, Mustangs, Excels
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 16 Jan 2025, 17:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/15/17 Posts: 85 Post Likes: +29
|
|
Thanks. Feels like a Baron should be less...
These topics are such an alchemy, I like 'all in' pricing because it provides one number and if you get enough numbers you get a range and from that a bell curve. Yeah the hangar, insurance, crew all vary but not by that much: pro pilot flown insurance $20k to low time single pilot aspirations $100k/yr? I can impute an $80k delta divided by my own situation: hours, experience, etc. Unlikely the all in hourly rate for an M2 is $1k or $5k, so I start to narrow it down to an average.
Plus it's easier for me to ask people I've just met or met online for one number. Or maybe i should ask for one number plus hours flown that year.
If someone wants to share everything in extreme detail that's great too.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 16 Jan 2025, 23:00 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/17/14 Posts: 5909 Post Likes: +2658 Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
|
|
This Burns Money Username Protected wrote: It's almost as if the "M" in "TBM" stands for "Mooney"... I thought it stood for Money?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 20 Jan 2025, 16:16 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/22/11 Posts: 1794 Post Likes: +2583 Location: Fort Worth TX
Aircraft: EMB 505, C421
|
|
Todd, I went from a TN A36 to a C421C. The family was very thankful for the change. A whole lot bigger, great pressurization, and faster. Almost always travel at FL200-220. I plane on 215-220 kts TAS. Great range and good load hauling capability. A bonus is the engines are easy to start, hot or cold. It’s our mini-airliner.
The downsides are fuel flow, around 44 GPH and frequent trips to a maintenance specialist for oil changes every 25 hours. The specialty shop gives it a careful seam on every oil change and fixes little things that crop up. It has however been very reliable and has only stranded me once in 3 year due to a cracked cylinder.
If I could upgrade to turbine power I would however. Reliability and performance gains would be substantial, but so would the cost of ownership.
Chris C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 21 Jan 2025, 00:45 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/05/09 Posts: 344 Post Likes: +186 Location: Portland, Oregon
Aircraft: MU-2F
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Todd, I went from a TN A36 to a C421C. The family was very thankful for the change. A whole lot bigger, great pressurization, and faster. Almost always travel at FL200-220. I plane on 215-220 kts TAS. Great range and good load hauling capability. A bonus is the engines are easy to start, hot or cold. It’s our mini-airliner.
The downsides are fuel flow, around 44 GPH and frequent trips to a maintenance specialist for oil changes every 25 hours. The specialty shop gives it a careful seam on every oil change and fixes little things that crop up. It has however been very reliable and has only stranded me once in 3 year due to a cracked cylinder.
If I could upgrade to turbine power I would however. Reliability and performance gains would be substantial, but so would the cost of ownership.
Chris C. Chris, I am not so sure about your last sentence. Turbines don't have routine oil changes, or vacuum pumps, or turbochargers or cylinders. You burn 44gph doing 220kts. I burn 58gph doing 250kts, 260kts when it is cold. Jet A costs less, sometimes a lot less. My last en-route fuel stop was in Billings MT. Jet A was $3.88. 100LL is $4.75 Jet A is $5.17 ay my home field (KHIO), 100LL is $7.60. Contract JetA at home is even less, but I can't get that price at my home field per CAA rules. My 100/200 hr inspections (essentially annuals the way I fly) average around $11K. 600hr was $16K and happen every three years and I will be due this fall. My one unscheduled maintenance issue cost $3K and took a day and a half to resolve. My plane has only been in the shop for any reason for the past 3 1/2 years for scheduled maintenance, in other words it has gone a year between shop visits for the past three years. This is not unusual for turbine planes I am told. In fairness I have a hot section inspection coming due this fall that will likely approach $100K, about what an engine replacement on a 421 would go for. The hot section interval is 1800hrs, so those don't happen very often. Not knocking pressurized piston twins, but there are turbine aircraft you can operate for similar money. Jeff Axel N228WP
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Upgrade from Baron Posted: 21 Jan 2025, 11:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/22/11 Posts: 1794 Post Likes: +2583 Location: Fort Worth TX
Aircraft: EMB 505, C421
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Todd, I went from a TN A36 to a C421C. The family was very thankful for the change. A whole lot bigger, great pressurization, and faster. Almost always travel at FL200-220. I plane on 215-220 kts TAS. Great range and good load hauling capability. A bonus is the engines are easy to start, hot or cold. It’s our mini-airliner.
The downsides are fuel flow, around 44 GPH and frequent trips to a maintenance specialist for oil changes every 25 hours. The specialty shop gives it a careful seam on every oil change and fixes little things that crop up. It has however been very reliable and has only stranded me once in 3 year due to a cracked cylinder.
If I could upgrade to turbine power I would however. Reliability and performance gains would be substantial, but so would the cost of ownership.
Chris C. Chris, I am not so sure about your last sentence. Turbines don't have routine oil changes, or vacuum pumps, or turbochargers or cylinders. You burn 44gph doing 220kts. I burn 58gph doing 250kts, 260kts when it is cold. Jet A costs less, sometimes a lot less. My last en-route fuel stop was in Billings MT. Jet A was $3.88. 100LL is $4.75 Jet A is $5.17 ay my home field (KHIO), 100LL is $7.60. Contract JetA at home is even less, but I can't get that price at my home field per CAA rules. My 100/200 hr inspections (essentially annuals the way I fly) average around $11K. 600hr was $16K and happen every three years and I will be due this fall. My one unscheduled maintenance issue cost $3K and took a day and a half to resolve. My plane has only been in the shop for any reason for the past 3 1/2 years for scheduled maintenance, in other words it has gone a year between shop visits for the past three years. This is not unusual for turbine planes I am told. In fairness I have a hot section inspection coming due this fall that will likely approach $100K, about what an engine replacement on a 421 would go for. The hot section interval is 1800hrs, so those don't happen very often. Not knocking pressurized piston twins, but there are turbine aircraft you can operate for similar money. Jeff Axel N228WP
Jeff, I agree with you and direct operating (variable) costs, especially fuel/oil. I've run the numbers many times, which is why we (partners) are considering selling the C421C and trying to upgrade to a turbine; leaning towards the C425. There are costs however which I refer to the "Turboprop Tax". Landing fees are always higher, insurance is higher (even on similar hull value), training costs are higher, hanger rent is higher, and generally the initial purchase price is definitely higher. To me it will probably be worth it just for peace of mind of engine reliability. But I can't knock the C421C, as for me it has been a great plane, may favorite of the 6 planes I've owned.
I threw the idea out there as a possibility to consider depending on how much money Matt had to spend on the upgrade. Now the truth is I live about 65 nm from perhaps on of the finest twin cessna maintenance organizations in the US located at Waco TX, and that makes my ownership/maintenance a no stress event. But yes, I would like to upgrade.
Chris C
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|