25 Jun 2025, 19:34 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Production Jet Numbers Posted: 25 Jul 2024, 14:56 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/07/10 Posts: 950 Post Likes: +1176
Aircraft: Pitts S-2B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Why not dueling pistols? Have you seen the price of ammo lately?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Production Jet Numbers Posted: 25 Jul 2024, 15:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/01/14 Posts: 9434 Post Likes: +16119 Location: Операционный офис КГБ
Aircraft: TU-104
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Why not dueling pistols? Have you seen the price of ammo lately?
No, the shelf tags around here all just say "Out of Stock"
_________________ Be kinder than I am. It’s a low bar. Flight suits = superior knowledge
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Production Jet Numbers Posted: 25 Jul 2024, 15:10 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/11/09 Posts: 5943 Post Likes: +5197 Company: Middle of the country company Location: Tulsa, Ok
Aircraft: Rebooting.......
|
|
Username Protected wrote: …and so it begins. Who’s got the boxing gloves?  Why not dueling pistols?
Nah, the epee is more exciting.....
_________________ Three things tell the truth: Little kids Drunks Yoga pants
Actually, four things..... Cycling kit..
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Production Jet Numbers Posted: 25 Jul 2024, 15:22 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20389 Post Likes: +25575 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Agreeing and supporting this general idea - big advantage to (most) public data is it is reported on a consistent basis, ie even if a “2024 model” shipped in late 2023 and therefore gets reported as 2023, that will be comparable to the next year’s data. Don’t change methodology year to year, or try to adjust for edge cases, usually it just leads to bad data. The shipments in GAMA are delivery date based, not on any "model year" or other basis. Members in GAMA attest to providing accurate information, that is part of the GAMA terms. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Production Jet Numbers Posted: 25 Jul 2024, 15:28 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20389 Post Likes: +25575 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: GAMA is the most accurate measure of aircraft deliveries Are you SURE? How do you know? When I was watching he early days of deliveries for new planes like EA500 and SF50, one can correlate the FAA registry dates for bill of sale and the GAMA reported numbers for those planes that are US registered (which is typically all of them for new production for a while).
While it is possible for an OEM to lie about their numbers, it is possible to pull the FAA registry records and check up on them. This is a lot easier now with free and instant online registry lookup (no waiting for CDROMs, and before that, microfiche). If an OEM lied to GAMA, they would be found out. Any foreign deliveries can generally be identified by serial number gaps in the FAA registry.
In the years I have tracked the data, I have always found the GAMA report to be very accurate.
Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Production Jet Numbers Posted: 25 Jul 2024, 16:16 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8065 Post Likes: +10405 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I would not expect them to lie, but my experience in other industries is that things get missed, or filled out incorrectly. I have seen this multiple times when comparing internal data to an industry report. One example, a client had submitted data for a single plant instead of company wide for three straight years, so the reported units was about 30% of actual. Exactly. No one is accusing anyone of lying. It's much more likely attributable to clerical errors. The example I gave of the Phenom 100 is a good one, GAMA likely missed the model change to EX's The one that always gets me is Gulfstream, I show 62 airplanes, GAMA shows 111 That's a huge difference! Gulfstream does sell aircraft that don't make the registry, but I doubt it's 50 airplanes.
_________________ Winners don’t whine.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Production Jet Numbers Posted: 25 Jul 2024, 16:44 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20389 Post Likes: +25575 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The one that always gets me is Gulfstream, I show 62 airplanes, GAMA shows 111 GAMA 2023 report, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, full year: Attachment: gulfstream-2023-deliveries.png I seriously doubt Gulfstream made an inaccurate report to GAMA. Hopefully you didn't pay too much for your data source. Mike C.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Production Jet Numbers Posted: 25 Jul 2024, 17:35 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8065 Post Likes: +10405 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The one that always gets me is Gulfstream, I show 62 airplanes, GAMA shows 111 GAMA 2023 report, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, full year: Attachment: gulfstream-2023-deliveries.png I seriously doubt Gulfstream made an inaccurate report to GAMA. Hopefully you didn't pay too much for your data source. Mike C.
The GAMA data is basically useless for my purposes, it has zero detail about individual aircraft, so why would I need it?
_________________ Winners don’t whine.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Production Jet Numbers Posted: 25 Jul 2024, 18:10 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8065 Post Likes: +10405 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm sure I'll regret this but I went down the FAA registry rabbit hole, filtered by manufacturer year(*) and easily found 64 G500/600/650/650ER airframes with enough serial number gaps to get into the 80s so the GAMA numbers pass the sniff test to me. 22 G280s looks about right as well.
To compound my woes I went even further down the rabbit hole looking for some "missing" serial numbers - there are some big gaps in the G650/ERs - and discovered s/n 6525 listed for sale as "never been in service" and now I'm curious as to how a year-old $75m jet is just.... sitting, doing nothing.
(* - Maybe I should be using first registration date instead of mfr year but it takes longer and I need to dig back out of the rabbit hole) 22 G280's is exactly what I show. On the larger airplanes the serials bounce around a lot, so it makes it really confusing. A couple of years ago the serial numbers for the G500's shifted 80 serials, with a couple in the middle. The G600's had a similar shift of 60 or so serials. The 650ER's have ten missing serial numbers. Again, always wonder if maybe these are going to the government and their existence is hidden. I did run a three year period and came up with 318 units, which makes sense and matches the 100 or so airplanes a year number. Which is a crazy number considering the size and complexity of those aircraft!
_________________ Winners don’t whine.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Production Jet Numbers Posted: 26 Jul 2024, 02:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/17/14 Posts: 5910 Post Likes: +2658 Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
|
|
Regarding the sitting $75M jets, some “greenies” sit for 3-4 months waiting on P&I, particularly if they are going to an outside shop. If it were my $5-10M paying for P&I, I would want one of the Gulfstream shops to do it. Gulfstream does stellar work and their cabinet sub in Pooler builds the finest aircraft cabinets that I have ever seen. They will sit sometimes waiting on their P&I slot.l, manufactured in 2023 but delivered in 2024. Depending upon final locality, that can save $100K per month in taxes, for it to sit until completed versus it being delivered and then waiting for their P&I slot at Joe’s amazing P&I.
Generally, the state and local taxes are not paid until the aircraft is “delivered.” You can bet that the tax person cometh as soon as the plane hits the FAA registry.
A fun experiment - hire the wrong aircraft titling agent and have them accidentally title your G-V in Chatham County, GA with the Gulfstream address. Care to guess the tax bill for that mistake, just for the few months until it got caught and fixed? It was in the high10s of thousands on a $43M bizjet! A new G650 is around $1.02M per year. Also, Chatham County has assessors that walk the ramp and make note of N numbers and even gander at the engines and avionics or local aircraft. If you have something looking like a new engine or overhaul in March, you get to fill out a tax form and submit your log pages. It’s about $600 in revenue and takes them less than an hour to walk the ramp. Even back in the late 90s they were looking at flight data and flight patterns for aircraft that were staying too long to be “transient.” A (then) $43M bizjet, even for a month, is a huge win. Wheels Up had a KA350 at KSAV off and on for a few weeks and they tracked the N number and they had nearly a $1000 bill. That was in 2022 or 2023. Since then WU rotated airframes. That’s just some hangar talk from the last time I was there, a year ago.
Another irony - Aircraft are delivered overseas and sit for months waiting for their registration. Some Chinese jets get registered but not approved to fly. each flight has to be approved by the Chinese government, including the military. Imagine if we had specific VFR and IFR routes and everything else was R- or P-. Sometimes the planes will fire up the APU, or use a GPU, the passenger will board and do business, eat and drink, and the plane has never moved. Sometimes they taxi from one side of the airport to another.
Also, some Gulfstream deliveries never make it to a civilian registry. Their special missions aircraft are amazing. Unfortunately, I don’t have any knowledge of how many special missions aircraft are delivered and no longer follow Gulfstream or their press releases. However, they are really neat to see something with large fairings on the side, covering electronics and antennas, effortlessly take off like that extra drag wasn’t even there.
I miss being an airport bum at KSAV! KIAD and KJYO are not at all interesting as a Savannah “tea” party. Southern people are nice but love to spill the T and avoid the tax person.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Production Jet Numbers Posted: 26 Jul 2024, 02:58 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/02/16 Posts: 577 Post Likes: +458
Aircraft: D55, C172
|
|
Interesting: no doubt things are/were booming. Yet on private pilot sites we are seeing a BIG cutback in flights. On the GA side of things. I understand airlines are cutting back on pilot hires too. Funny how most people just keep wanting to put a positive spin on anything they’re neck deep involved in.
_________________ Embrace The Suck
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New Production Jet Numbers Posted: 26 Jul 2024, 10:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20389 Post Likes: +25575 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My understanding is just the Cirrus fleet, by itself, is flying over 1 million hours a year. That is only a little above 100 hours/year per aircraft, which seems pretty reasonable as an average. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|