04 Jul 2025, 17:12 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 10 Mar 2022, 16:56 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/30/09 Posts: 3704 Post Likes: +2340 Location: $ilicon Vall€y
Aircraft: Columbia 400
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 6 people (pilot + 5 passengers - or 4 with a co-pilot) = 1,020 lbs 240 lbs luggage 600 nm typical trip, though some will be as short as 200 nm Region: St. Louis based, with flights to Denver, Anne Arbor, Charlotte, Dallas Lav onboard: if block time exceeds 2.5 hrs. In other words, no potty is needed if block time less than 2.5 hrs.
Primary considerations: Passenger comfort, dispatch rate, low operating costs Not as important: block time or speed
One thing that's missing in your mission statement: How often? If this happens a couple of times a year, and the owner wants the prestige of owning a plane, the least you might consider is a 421. If the trips are frequent, you'll be money ahead going with a King Air. They're slow-ish, but reliable and comfortable and pretty much, do this trip. Costs are highly predictable. If you press a 40-50 year old pressurized piston twin into this as a frequent mission, you will have a lot of down time, you will have a lot of unexpected maintenance expense, you will spend a lot of time hunting for parts. You will not spend less than the King Air. Even though the paper numbers for the King Air are scarier, the unexpected costs for a 40+ year old pressurized piston cabin class twin. I've run the numbers, there's no way to do this cheaply.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 10 Mar 2022, 17:18 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/02/19 Posts: 63 Post Likes: +31
|
|
Username Protected wrote: OP said "flexible on acquisition costs" but who knows - that may means he can stretch his budget to $800k from $400k. He also didn't say what the opex budget was, or how many times a year he'd do this trip. We're missing a lot of info - but it's always fun to spend someone else's money for them. Worst case: assume one 200 nm trip per week and two 600 nm trips per month, so 4,000 nm per month all in. Unfortunately, from all the feedback so far, I think TPs are the only game in town. I think we will have to shift to staying with piston aircraft for missions 200 nm and less and fly commercial for everything greater until we have the cash flow to afford a TP. In the interim, my accountant suggests that we pursue the American Airlines AirPass program or the United PassPlus program to lock in predictable travel costs and secure last minute tickets as business needs dictate. We'd then keep track of how our commercial travel costs trend against hourly aircraft costs. We can comfortably afford only $500 - $600 per hour now, so it may be a while before we can afford a TP. Oh well... Vic.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 10 Mar 2022, 18:03 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/12 Posts: 4888 Post Likes: +5545 Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: In the interim, my accountant suggests that we pursue the American Airlines AirPass program or the United PassPlus program to lock in predictable travel costs and secure last minute tickets as business needs dictate. My prediction: Once you start flying the piston, your accountant will be unpleasantly surprised by how inflexible airline travel is and how much time it consumes. Depending on how much you value your employees' time, it may move you to TPs earlier. Chances are good that with employees travelling on short notice, a TP will be much faster than the airlines to ANY destination you have in the United States. If you fill the seats, the TP will win on time *and* price.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 10 Mar 2022, 18:34 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12822 Post Likes: +5262 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: We can comfortably afford only $500 - $600 per hour now, so it may be a while before we can afford a TP. . Which airport would you use for commercial service? Also consider a PA46. It has a vibrant support ecosystem (parts, shops, CFI's, mods) and $500-600/hr is a good budget. It's not a limo but it is a nice airplane and will generally impress laypeople. It's not exactly what you want, but it's close and within your budget.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 10 Mar 2022, 19:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/02/19 Posts: 63 Post Likes: +31
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Which airport would you use for commercial service?
Also consider a PA46. It has a vibrant support ecosystem (parts, shops, CFI's, mods) and $500-600/hr is a good budget. It's not a limo but it is a nice airplane and will generally impress laypeople. It's not exactly what you want, but it's close and within your budget. We'd considered the PA-46, but wound up back with the twin Cessnas based on concerns with reliability and the twin versus single argument. I don't want to pollute this thread with that holy war though. Suffice it to say that we had convinced ourselves that a 340A or 414A was doable financially and could meet some of our other goals as well. Now, I am not so sure. Airports = Charlotte and St. Louis.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 10 Mar 2022, 20:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/24/18 Posts: 736 Post Likes: +359 Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: OP said "flexible on acquisition costs" but who knows - that may means he can stretch his budget to $800k from $400k. He also didn't say what the opex budget was, or how many times a year he'd do this trip. We're missing a lot of info - but it's always fun to spend someone else's money for them. Worst case: assume one 200 nm trip per week and two 600 nm trips per month, so 4,000 nm per month all in. Unfortunately, from all the feedback so far, I think TPs are the only game in town. I think we will have to shift to staying with piston aircraft for missions 200 nm and less and fly commercial for everything greater until we have the cash flow to afford a TP. In the interim, my accountant suggests that we pursue the American Airlines AirPass program or the United PassPlus program to lock in predictable travel costs and secure last minute tickets as business needs dictate. We'd then keep track of how our commercial travel costs trend against hourly aircraft costs. We can comfortably afford only $500 - $600 per hour now, so it may be a while before we can afford a TP. Oh well... Vic.
50k nm a year is 250+ hours in a 421. No chance that happens unless you have a full time A&P with Twin Cessna experience on payroll. Imho.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 10 Mar 2022, 20:07 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/15/17 Posts: 1126 Post Likes: +583 Company: Cessna (retired)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Which airport would you use for commercial service?
Also consider a PA46. It has a vibrant support ecosystem (parts, shops, CFI's, mods) and $500-600/hr is a good budget. It's not a limo but it is a nice airplane and will generally impress laypeople. It's not exactly what you want, but it's close and within your budget. We'd considered the PA-46, but wound up back with the twin Cessnas based on concerns with reliability and the twin versus single argument. I don't want to pollute this thread with that holy war though. Suffice it to say that we had convinced ourselves that a 340A or 414A was doable financially and could meet some of our other goals as well. Now, I am not so sure. Airports = Charlotte and St. Louis.
Two different kinds of reliability:
Keep going safely when something fails. Twins win (with a good pilot). TP better and jet best.
Fixing things when they break. Singles win, turbines less often but more costly, twin pistons nickel and dime you to death.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 10 Mar 2022, 20:44 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/14/11 Posts: 801 Post Likes: +958
Aircraft: Bonanza V35
|
|
Buy a single pilot citation. $300k or so buys one. More comfortable, capable, and safer than any turbo prop. Not much more cost to operate either.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 10 Mar 2022, 21:01 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/24/18 Posts: 736 Post Likes: +359 Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Buy a single pilot citation. $300k or so buys one. More comfortable, capable, and safer than any turbo prop. Not much more cost to operate either. Mike T knows better but I believe A decent SP citation is currently 500k+
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for 6 people, 600 nm Posted: 10 Mar 2022, 22:21 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/14/13 Posts: 6410 Post Likes: +5145
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Buy a single pilot citation. $300k or so buys one. More comfortable, capable, and safer than any turbo prop. Not much more cost to operate either. And the best part is you just throw it away when you’re done!
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|