22 Jan 2026, 11:55 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real world HondaJet runway performance Posted: 28 Oct 2021, 22:54 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21115 Post Likes: +26569 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It’d be interesting to have ground roll data, but it seems they don’t give that info anymore. Subtract 1000 feet to get ground roll approximately. For takeoff, the extra distance to climb to 35 feet on one engine is generally about 1000 ft or longer. On landing, the 50 foot threshold crossing height at a 3 degree slope is 1000 ft. As the altitude gets higher, the takeoff adjustment will be larger than 1000 ft, so 1000 ft is conservative. I've actually measured this on my plane with the G700 panels logging data. The result of those measurements is generally about a 1000 ft lower ground roll than takeoff/landing distance from the manual. What that means is the ground roll for my V is about: 0 MSL, 30 C (warmish), no wind, flat runway, at 12,500 lbs: Takeoff: 1370 feet, V1 85, Vr 92 Landing: 1460 feet, Vref 96 Those are crazy short numbers, but I believe they will be achieved. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real world HondaJet runway performance Posted: 28 Oct 2021, 23:13 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/15/21 Posts: 3236 Post Likes: +1699
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have a HondaJet based at KEMT, so 4200ft rwy. He busts out of there easily fully loaded on hot days, seems to have room to spare. Pretty sure the takeoff numbers in the provided table are BFL, so with all engines operating he'll lift off in quite a bit less than 4,200 feet. At sea level, max weight, 35 degrees C, if he loses a fan at V1 and continues the takeoff, he should be at 35 feet AGL at 4,084' runway length. However, I'm showing KEMT TODA to be 3,995'.
_________________ Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real world HondaJet runway performance Posted: 29 Oct 2021, 10:32 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21115 Post Likes: +26569 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BydhPvkxSdE You only get with the premium sound package. Standard: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0_-IpfCdCkMike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real world HondaJet runway performance Posted: 29 Oct 2021, 11:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/15/21 Posts: 3236 Post Likes: +1699
|
|
Username Protected wrote: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BydhPvkxSdE  Man, that ain't such a much. What you need is the afterburner package: [youtube]https://youtu.be/2T0E8Lc5yRo[/youtube]
_________________ Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real world HondaJet runway performance Posted: 29 Oct 2021, 12:00 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21115 Post Likes: +26569 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What you need is the afterburner package: Definitely not LOP. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real world HondaJet runway performance Posted: 29 Oct 2021, 13:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have a HondaJet based at KEMT, so 4200ft rwy. He busts out of there easily fully loaded on hot days, seems to have room to spare. You can't tell if one engine eats a bird on takeoff roll and he rejects the takeoff how much he has to spare. When two are spinning TO in a twin turbo-jet is a non event.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real world HondaJet runway performance Posted: 29 Oct 2021, 16:39 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21115 Post Likes: +26569 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You can't tell if one engine eats a bird on takeoff roll and he rejects the takeoff how much he has to spare. The number of times a jet has had an actual engine failure within +/- 2 seconds of V1 is maybe 2 or 3 times in human history. It is VERY rare due to engine reliability and the extreme narrow timing required to be at V1. If it occurs well before V1, you have plenty of runway to stop. If it occurs well after V1, you are already airborne. In my plane V1 and Vr happen so fast, like 1 second apart, that you are flying very quickly. One thing to note is that the "fly" distance has margin in it since it is to 35 feet AGL. Thus your wheels will be off the ground about 1000 feet or so of run distance prior to the chart distance. In contrast the "stop" distance has NO margin. You need every foot of chart distance to stop when aborting at V1. That doesn't necessarily mean you should favor flying since running of the end of the runway at 30 knots is relatively safe (outside exceptions like KTEX). Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real world HondaJet runway performance Posted: 29 Oct 2021, 17:00 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/15/21 Posts: 3236 Post Likes: +1699
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That doesn't necessarily mean you should favor flying since running of the end of the runway at 30 knots is relatively safe (outside exceptions like KTEX).
Mike C. Doesn't KTEX have an EMAS arresting system? Mountain Air, for sure you'd have a problem if you couldn't stop in time.
_________________ Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real world HondaJet runway performance Posted: 29 Oct 2021, 17:54 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21115 Post Likes: +26569 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Doesn't KTEX have an EMAS arresting system? Ah, they do, installed during the runway rehab. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real world HondaJet runway performance Posted: 29 Oct 2021, 19:02 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/20/15 Posts: 680 Post Likes: +378 Location: KFAT
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That doesn't necessarily mean you should favor flying since running of the end of the runway at 30 knots is relatively safe (outside exceptions like KTEX).
Mike C. Doesn't KTEX have an EMAS arresting system? Mountain Air, for sure you'd have a problem if you couldn't stop in time.
Mountain Air just needs a nice pitch down at the end of the runway
[youtube]https://youtu.be/fbFtWaRGoF8[/youtube]
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real world HondaJet runway performance Posted: 29 Oct 2021, 23:30 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/15/21 Posts: 3236 Post Likes: +1699
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Mountain Air just needs a nice pitch down at the end of the runway
Mountain Air is one place I might actually play with V1 and lower it. Going off the edge at Vr with one fan sounds a lot better than trying to abort and going off the edge at 30 knots. Maybe it's just an illusion, but this guy does not seem to be accelerating too fast as he approaches the end of Mountain Air: https://youtu.be/1Hq9k9Bl5lA&t=6m26s
_________________ Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Real world HondaJet runway performance Posted: 31 Oct 2021, 09:09 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/23/15 Posts: 205 Post Likes: +96 Location: Greensboro, NC
Aircraft: Twin Bonanza, MU2
|
|
|
Just been mindful landing on wet runways. With no TRs and no wing spoilers, this plane becomes a handful to stop. There have been quite a few runway excursions on slippery runways. Flew the aircraft for about 150 hours, good performer and fun to fly, but mindful when wet.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|