05 Jul 2025, 16:23 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 05 Oct 2021, 17:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20423 Post Likes: +25682 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Mike, Aren't the rudder and aileron trims at the back of the console? Yes. Quote: If so, how did you move those? Pics? Thx! No pics handy, but the roll and yaw trim systems have long shafts to the back of the console which change length depending on what is installed See item 16 below: Attachment: roll-trim-ipc-1.png My console was shortened as much as it can be. Makes a HUGE difference in cockpit comfort! I can basically walk into the pilot's seat now. Mike C.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 05 Oct 2021, 19:14 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/05/16 Posts: 3138 Post Likes: +2284 Company: Tack Mobile Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It still moves air through the same path. Not effectively. On the PT6, the prop only has the last turbine wheel attached. That hardly moves any air at hand prop speeds. The gas generator section isn't turning. On the TPE331, the entire rotating group, 3 turbine wheels and 2 centrifugal compressors, turn with the prop. It moves quite a lot of air. The main benefit of being able to move air post shutdown is to get any residual unburned fuel off the nozzles. If the fuel stays on the nozzle and gets hot without burning, it turns into carbon deposits which lead to streaking fuel nozzle patterns. That leads to less atomization of the fuel and longer flame lengths that damage the turbine wheel and stator. Using the starter on PT6 shutdown does basically the same thing as the hand prop on a TPE331, turns the main part of the engine to get airflow. This both evaporates unburned fuel and also cools the engine. Spinning the prop really won't do that very well. Mike C.
On the 441 and I assume other TPE331 installations, the fuel is purged automatically on shutdown. The fuel purging system is recharged after the engine is started.
I believe this was (is?) an EPA requirement.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 05 Oct 2021, 19:55 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/24/13 Posts: 9855 Post Likes: +4615 Company: Aviation Tools / CCX Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: On the 441 and I assume other TPE331 installations, the fuel is purged automatically on shutdown. The fuel purging system is recharged after the engine is started.
I believe this was (is?) an EPA requirement.
The EPA requirement is that you can't just dump it on the ground which was what the PT6A used to do. Now they catch it in a container and burn it on startup in the exhaust.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 05 Oct 2021, 23:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/09 Posts: 345 Post Likes: +294 Company: Premier Bone and Joint Location: Wyoming
Aircraft: BE90,HUSK,MU-2
|
|
Not sure on the 441, but in the TPE-331 installation in the Mits, the EPA can collects air pressure once the engine speed gets up above around 96%. It stays pressurized for the rest of the flight. When the RCS switches are pulled back when shutting down, the air pressure is pushed through the fuel lines and the engine temps momentarily jump at the fuel is burned off in the engine, then it spools down to stop. But as Mike suggested, a droplet of jet fuel may well still sit at the ends of the nozzles and that's one of the main reasons the props are turned a little while after shutdown. Supposedly it can also prevent shaft-bow...but I'm not even sure that really happens (or if it does, it must be pretty rare as I've never seen, felt or heard anything odd in a hot engine). I understand that the single turbine wheel connected to the gearbox in a Pratt will move some air (and I'll be the first to admit that I don't know nearly as much about our King Airs as my Mits), but wouldn't the final turbine wheel actually just suck a little air into the exhaust ports rather than pulling a large volume of flow through the intake of the power section? I guess some of that airflow would make it to the combustor, but I'd be surprised if it does much. Should be easy to test though. Shut down, get the baggage and pax out and let it sit for a few minutes, then check the indicated ITT drop over about 3 minutes, pull the prop through 20 blades and check again at 3 min to see the delta in temp drop. Fun experiment.
_________________ Thomas
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 05 Oct 2021, 23:47 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20423 Post Likes: +25682 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I understand that the single turbine wheel connected to the gearbox in a Pratt will move some air (and I'll be the first to admit that I don't know nearly as much about our King Airs as my Mits), but wouldn't the final turbine wheel actually just suck a little air into the exhaust ports rather than pulling a large volume of flow through the intake of the power section? If the prop is turned in the normal direction, the turbine wheel will tend to move air out the exhaust. But it won't do a good job because the turbine blade shape is designed to slow down fast air turning it into torque. Thus the turbine blade shapes are facing the wrong way. Thus the lift it gets is poor, which yields little air movement. In this photo, the air moves left to right through the turbine disk which spins clockwise: Attachment: turbine-wheel-1.jpg If the disk is spun clockwise, the airfoil shapes of the blades will do a very poor job of moving air. It is like a highly cambered wing flying upside down. They are basically backwards from what would work. In contrast, the compressor section of the engine, be it axial or centrifugal, has the blades in the right shape to move air. Alas, in the PT6 you can't spin the compressor section from the prop, you can only spin it with the starter. One of the reasons the TPE331 has a much longer overhaul interval than the PT6 is the ability to keep the nozzles clean with the manual prop spin. Mike C.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
Last edited on 06 Oct 2021, 00:57, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 06 Oct 2021, 01:22 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/05/16 Posts: 3138 Post Likes: +2284 Company: Tack Mobile Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Not sure on the 441, but in the TPE-331 installation in the Mits, the EPA can collects air pressure once the engine speed gets up above around 96%. It stays pressurized for the rest of the flight. When the RCS switches are pulled back when shutting down, the air pressure is pushed through the fuel lines and the engine temps momentarily jump at the fuel is burned off in the engine, then it spools down to stop. It’s the same in the 441, except it’s a button and you hold it down to release the air. What is RCS?
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|