banner
banner

09 Jul 2025, 07:22 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Concorde Battery (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 263 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 18  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM
PostPosted: 11 Sep 2021, 10:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/11/14
Posts: 1406
Post Likes: +379
Location: 46U
Aircraft: C182, Lancair IV-P
When I sat in a Meridian and an M600, the entry wasn’t that easy but doable. Both times, I had somewhat oversized running shoes on. Took mental note for next time to wear P-46 slippers. Dunno if this will help?

Best,

Tom


Top

 Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM
PostPosted: 11 Sep 2021, 10:21 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/03/11
Posts: 2023
Post Likes: +2072
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
I scratch my head when people complain about pa46 egress and ingress. It’s easier than any jet with a console in the middle, which is basically all of them.

Piaggio cockpit much bigger than pa46 but pa46 order of magnitude easier to get in and out of.

Tin can comments on pa46 are head scratching. I owned one and flew it all around the country. Not tin can at all. Cockpit extremely comfortable and noticeably wider than the TBM. I am 6’, 170lb and routinely did 6 hour flights.

I think the old meredians are great bargains. TBM only gets the nod if you need the range IMO. One should note though that the old tbm’s (pre c2) don’t have the range and payload of the newer ones.


Top

 Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM
PostPosted: 11 Sep 2021, 11:08 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20439
Post Likes: +25711
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I scratch my head when people complain about pa46 egress and ingress. It’s easier than any jet with a console in the middle, which is basically all of them.

Not mine!

I removed the pedestal entirely with the avionics upgrade. FMS gone, autopilot functions moved to center panel.

Made an ENORMOUS changer to cockpit access.

More and more are doing this.

I really worried about cockpit comfort with a control column through the floor and the pedestal sticking out. The pedestal is gone and the control column is a non issue.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Meridian ingress-egress ergonomics
PostPosted: 11 Sep 2021, 11:08 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 10/06/16
Posts: 116
Post Likes: +183
Location: Tucson, AZ (winter) & Brunswick, ME (summer)
Aircraft: T210, Aerostar 702P
Fair enough. Personal experiences vary, mine was the opposite.

I tried to get into the M600 on display at Oshkosh, and couldn't make it. Once I'm walking hunched over, lifting a leg over the spar while simultaneously maneuvering into the pilot seat was too uncomfortable for me. The sales guy there tried to show me how, but he wasn't successful.

By contrast, in the Aerostar I just step up into the pilot seat and close the door, easy peasy. Same with my 210.

Ingress and egress ergonomics are important. It's reasonable to assume that my flexibility will decline with age, whereas my weight and grumpiness will increase. So if I don't fit today, I won't fit tomorrow.

My $0.02

Mark


Top

 Post subject: Re: Meridian ingress-egress ergonomics
PostPosted: 11 Sep 2021, 11:19 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14389
Post Likes: +9519
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
Username Protected wrote:
I tried to get into the M600 on display at Oshkosh, and couldn't make it. Once I'm walking hunched over, lifting a leg over the spar while simultaneously maneuvering into the pilot seat was too uncomfortable for me. The sales guy there tried to show me how, but he wasn't successful.


Wasn't easy but I was able to get in. Once seated however it was also no bueno. Yes the seat was all the way back. To Chuck's point, I might have been able to make it work with a custom seat cushion if that could possibly give 2 more inches of headroom, and maybe switch to in-ear headsets, and maybe a custom cover on the base of the panel... might do the trick.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM
PostPosted: 11 Sep 2021, 11:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/02/15
Posts: 3811
Post Likes: +2654
Location: Fresno, CA (KFCH)
Aircraft: T210M
Username Protected wrote:

The others are that any cabin class plane has a technique to get in place. Once you learn the technique that works for you, you don't even notice anymore. First time I got in a PC12 or a PC24, I thought you have to be kidding me. Harder than getting in my PA46 the first time, because I didn't have a technique yet. Same for an M2, etc.


Yup. Got to have the right technique. Call it the “dance” if you like, but I call it the “slide” when getting in the TBM.

My first time was my buddy’s TBM850 and I was very turned off, thinking my wife, with mobility issues would never want this level of difficulty. (Turns out as a really short person it was easy for her from the start).

Once you figure out you can’t just walk up the middle and sit like a church pew and learn to face to the side away from your seat then slide your feet past the pedestal it becomes easy and natural and a non-issue. Do not try to make steps, always slide. Not sure yet how the spar changes this technique but something similar seems likely.

Are the later models PA-46 built with adjustable rudder pedals? I have a 6’-2” torso and 5’-8” legs, so the ability to move the pedals aft in the TBM was very helpful in matching cockpit to pilot.

_________________
G3X PFD, G3X MFD, G5, GFC500, GTN750xi, GTN650xi, GTX345
Previous: TBM850/T210M/C182P
APS 2004


Top

 Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM
PostPosted: 11 Sep 2021, 14:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/01/10
Posts: 3500
Post Likes: +2473
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
Username Protected wrote:
The PA46 is very comfortable once in the seat. I think there are a few reasons for the comments. One, people want an excuse not to buy a multimillion dollar aircraft. :duck:

Haha. True, but many people buying a multimillion dollar aircraft also expect to be able to enter and exit comfortably.

_________________
Previous A36TN owner


Top

 Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM
PostPosted: 11 Sep 2021, 17:20 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/05/16
Posts: 3139
Post Likes: +2284
Company: Tack Mobile
Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
Username Protected wrote:
I have heard many times the PA46 is very tight up front but once you are actually in the seat and seated how does it compare to the A36 or baron? I have never sat in a PA46 but I feel like it has to feel significantly more spacious because it sports a significantly wider cabin than the Bonanza and Baron. I can't understand where the I don't fit in this cockpit comments come from?


The PA46 is very comfortable once in the seat. I think there are a few reasons for the comments. One, people want an excuse not to buy a multimillion dollar aircraft. :duck:

The others are that any cabin class plane has a technique to get in place. Once you learn the technique that works for you, you don't even notice anymore. First time I got in a PC12 or a PC24, I thought you have to be kidding me. Harder than getting in my PA46 the first time, because I didn't have a technique yet. Same for an M2, etc.

There were many modifications to the PA46 and the newer ones have more room than the older ones. Thinner higher density foam seats, backs that go over and not limited by the wing spar, and the cockpit redesigned to give more hip and headroom.

The other reason is that the seats are not set up right for the newbie. The seats on the PA46 go back and forth, up and down, and recline. I am 6'2 and don't have to have the seat all the way back. One PA46 driver that I know is 6'7 and built like a GB lineman. One of the better known PA46 instructors is 6'5 and doesn't complain. So when I hear someone 6 foot tall saying they don't fit.... Doesn't pass the sniff test. They just need someone to show them how to work it.

Did this flight yesterday, 1500 nm and 5:28 in the M600. Was super comfortable. Would take it any day over 2 legs first class in the aluminum greyhound shoulder to shoulder wearing the mask of shame. :D

Attachment:
1.jpg


One nice thing about the 400 series Cessnas is you have the width of a King Air, or I believe about an inch more, without the pedestal, so it's easy to get into. I think this is similar to the MU2, although I believe the Cessnas have those beat on width.

Top

 Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM
PostPosted: 11 Sep 2021, 19:05 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/19/15
Posts: 1628
Post Likes: +1501
Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis
Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
My 421 was way easier than PA46. But the only time I cared about getting in the PA46 cockpit was when someone was in the copilot seat.

My 501sp is really tight and is not as comfortable as PA46 once in. At least in the PA46 I could spread my legs to the co pilot side. Not in the 501sp with the console.

Crazy that the larger 501sp has a smaller cockpit than the 421 and the PA46.

I have yet to have a plane with a cockpit that I fit in. The 421 was pretty nice.


Mike


Top

 Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM
PostPosted: 11 Sep 2021, 20:25 
Online


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/24/13
Posts: 9861
Post Likes: +4620
Company: Aviation Tools / CCX
Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
Username Protected wrote:
Tin can comments on pa46 are head scratching. I owned one and flew it all around the country. Not tin can at all. Cockpit extremely comfortable and noticeably wider than the TBM. I am 6’, 170lb and routinely did 6 hour flights.


Agree with you that Meridians are well built. But I feel cramped in the Meridian, opposite in the TBM.


Top

 Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM
PostPosted: 11 Sep 2021, 21:07 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/07/11
Posts: 824
Post Likes: +468
Location: KBED, KCRE
Aircraft: Phenom 100
Username Protected wrote:
Tin can comments on pa46 are head scratching. I owned one and flew it all around the country. Not tin can at all. Cockpit extremely comfortable and noticeably wider than the TBM. I am 6’, 170lb and routinely did 6 hour flights.


Agree with you that Meridians are well built. But I feel cramped in the Meridian, opposite in the TBM.

The TBM had more headroom for me but a noticeably less amount of shoulder room. I had a custom seat cushion made for the meridian which gave me an extra 2.5" of torso room which was great. My headset would still hit the left side if I wasn't paying attention but I guess you just get used to it. Same with getting in the cockpit, you just learn the shuffle and then don't think about it. It's one of the most efficient turboprops out there, clearly there will be sacrifices. I always felt they were minor. I still haven't found an overly comfortable position in the 100. But there's a new SB to allow for 3 more inches of seat travel, so :dance:

Chip-

Top

 Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM
PostPosted: 12 Sep 2021, 03:39 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/24/18
Posts: 736
Post Likes: +359
Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
Username Protected wrote:
My 421 was way easier than PA46. But the only time I cared about getting in the PA46 cockpit was when someone was in the copilot seat.

My 501sp is really tight and is not as comfortable as PA46 once in. At least in the PA46 I could spread my legs to the co pilot side. Not in the 501sp with the console.

Crazy that the larger 501sp has a smaller cockpit than the 421 and the PA46.

I have yet to have a plane with a cockpit that I fit in. The 421 was pretty nice.


Mike


I’m 6’2” 240 and comfortable even on 3+ hour legs. Did you experiment with the seat controls?


Top

 Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM
PostPosted: 12 Sep 2021, 03:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/19/15
Posts: 1628
Post Likes: +1501
Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis
Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
Israel

I took out my bulkhead behind the pilot seat and my seat is all the way back. I am 6’5” 260lbs. So there is no cockpit made for me. I could not physically fly a 501 without the bulkhead and cabinet removed. I also had my pilot seat modified and took out foam. I am
Still cramped in there.

The fact that I fit in the PA46 shows how they can fit larger guys. But I had the seat modified. You can make most cockpits work for taller guys but they need mods.

Mike


Top

 Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM
PostPosted: 12 Sep 2021, 05:41 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/15/21
Posts: 3002
Post Likes: +1554
Username Protected wrote:
Israel

I took out my bulkhead behind the pilot seat and my seat is all the way back. I am 6’5” 260lbs. So there is no cockpit made for me. I could not physically fly a 501 without the bulkhead and cabinet removed. I also had my pilot seat modified and took out foam. I am
Still cramped in there.

The fact that I fit in the PA46 shows how they can fit larger guys. But I had the seat modified. You can make most cockpits work for taller guys but they need mods.

Mike

I flew right seat in a 501 this summer and it was tight but not uncomfortable once I got in. Didn't get a chance to try the left seat. I'm 6'2" and 190 lbs on a good day.

My brother is 6'4" and 220 lbs, so based on what Mike is saying it could be a challenge for him. He was on the summer 501 flight, but in the back and did not try out the cockpit. This may be an issue as a long-term plan I'm floating is both my brother and I get 500 ratings and co-buy a 501. By the way, he just started taking flying lessons last month and his instructor is ready to solo him after 4.5 hours of flight instruction; at this rate he'll have a 500 type rating before me! :woot:

My theory is that since the 501 is basically a 500 and the 500 was originally designed for a professional non-owner crew in mind (shorter ex-military pilots?), Cessna did not put much thought into cockpit space.

I've heard 525's are similarly tight on the left seat. But those were originally designed more for owner-operators, so seems to me they should have factored in more space, even though the 525 nose seems to be based on the 500 nose.

But sorry :btt: Sounds like the PA46 would be a good "fit" for my brother (though I suspect he really wants a Vision Jet). However, I need something that can carry 7-8 people and a PC-12 is too much CAPEX for me.

_________________
Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.


Top

 Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM
PostPosted: 12 Sep 2021, 09:34 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20439
Post Likes: +25711
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
My brother is 6'4" and 220 lbs, so based on what Mike is saying it could be a challenge for him.

I'm similarly sized and having no comfort issues in the Citation cockpit. Mine has no pedestal.

Quote:
PC-12 is too much CAPEX for me.

I can't afford a PC-12.

I fly a Citation V.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 263 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 18  Next



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.