banner
banner

29 Nov 2025, 17:56 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2017, 17:25 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1434
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
I've been flying the wings off my SR22T / Seneca this past year, running at ~350 hours / year with no signs of slowing down. 90% of my missions are out and back, same day business trips within a 3 hour radius. I really don't care to fly more than 6 hours / day.

The high altitude fatigue is kicking my butt although I've been able to combat it better lately with increased hydration & O2. The biggest thing I'm looking for now is time savings. A SETP would give me 120 hours / yr of additional business hours, which is VERY, VERY attractive. The time savings on maintaining (2) piston birds is also a huge potential time savings as most SETP's seem to go through the year with very few mx events. I can't even begin to estimate how much time I spend per year dealing with mx issues on these birds. Higher altitude & pressurization are nice bonuses as well. Thus far my thinking has been to sell my SR22T and share in the Seneca and buy an earlier model Meridian. Realistically, my budget for acquisition is in the $500K-900K range.

I've read many negative reviews about the Eclipse and had dismissed it from any potential list of upgrade candidates because of these reviews and the concerns about the long-term viability of the company. However, it sounds like there have been some good changes to the company / airplanes in the last year or so that may make them a viable option. 1.5, 1.7 and 1.9 models are showing up on the market in the $700K-900K range and when I run the total cost of ownership #'s, it comes out VERY close to the Meridian. It's basically a wash. There are also reasonable ADS-B upgrade options now available, whereas before there weren't reasonable economic options available.

As I understand, the life limits have been extended, so these are no longer pumpkins. I also understand that there are other shops besides Eclipse mx facilities that can / do work on these. From a time savings standpoint, the Eclipse would offer 175 hours of time savings for me per year since it's significantly faster than the Meridian.

So, what's the general feeling on these birds now. Am I missing something?

_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Last edited on 01 Sep 2017, 17:32, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2017, 17:30 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/28/13
Posts: 6310
Post Likes: +4393
Location: Indiana
Aircraft: C195, D17S, M20TN
Hi Don,

Think you could find an ex E owner on here that just purchased a TBM to get away from them. From a business standpoint I can't see them making it. Hope I'm wrong. Look at the older TBM's in your budget, you won't regret it in the end. Need a broker that knows that market. Many selling TBM's now but few have the knowledge. Good luck in your search.

_________________
Chuck
KEVV


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2017, 17:36 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12835
Post Likes: +5276
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
How you think your client base will react to the two? There's a theory, mostly correct I think, that the general public lumps all prop planes together (172, meridian) and all jets (eclipse, gulfstream)

If eclipse - I'd suggest an exclusive lease for a year with option to buy.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2017, 18:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/03/11
Posts: 197
Post Likes: +200
Location: San Diego, CA
Aircraft: B55, P46T
For me the eclipse 50ft landing distance dropped it out of the running.
3000 foot runways would require perfection and heavy brake action, $$$.

Also flying to a meeting and getting out of a jet as pilot/ no passengers just feels wrong.
I dont want millennials hog tying me to their Prius!! :eek:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2017, 19:04 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1434
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
Username Protected wrote:
Hi Don,

Think you could find an ex E owner on here that just purchased a TBM to get away from them. From a business standpoint I can't see them making it. Hope I'm wrong. Look at the older TBM's in your budget, you won't regret it in the end. Need a broker that knows that market. Many selling TBM's now but few have the knowledge. Good luck in your search.


Thanks Chuck. I really like the TBM but from my homework thus far, it's going to be significantly more cost to own / operate compared to Meridian. Even if acquisition costs are on par with Meridian, I don't believe I can afford it at the present time.

_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2017, 19:06 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1434
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
Username Protected wrote:
How you think your client base will react to the two? There's a theory, mostly correct I think, that the general public lumps all prop planes together (172, meridian) and all jets (eclipse, gulfstream)

If eclipse - I'd suggest an exclusive lease for a year with option to buy.


That's excellent feedback Charles and honestly a point I hadn't considered. I can definitely see how a client would see a jet (even a 'cheap' jet) as sign of extravagance.

_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2017, 19:11 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7098
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
I for one like the Eclipse. Once they have a certified version of the 700 I will potentially in line to get one. It will have the legs to do what I need it to do.

To answer the OP question I think that the Meridian is the most underrated airplane on the market. I don't feel that there will be an appreciable difference in operating cost between the Meridian and the TBM, although I think you can purchase a Meridian at a lot lower entry point.

I also believe that once you go pressurized all weather turbine, you will kick yourself for not doing it sooner. On a per mile basis, I believe that the Meridian will be pretty close to the Cirrus on an hourly operating cost perspective.

_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2017, 19:47 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14428
Post Likes: +9558
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
If you fit I'd vote for the Meridian. Lower opex, no type rating, less onerous recurrence requirements, easy to fly and you'll be able to sell it when you want to move up later.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2017, 19:54 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8729
Post Likes: +9456
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
The short answer is Meridian.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2017, 19:58 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/26/09
Posts: 1484
Post Likes: +995
Company: ElitAire
Location: Columbus, OH - KCMH
Aircraft: Piaggio P180
Don - Come on down and fly the MU-2 with me. Seems to match your requirements well. Check out my flights - bet they match your missions. N22MK.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2017, 20:03 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8729
Post Likes: +9456
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
Old(er) airplanes, as great as they may be, inevitably have more maintenance issues to,deal with. I think Don is trying to save time spent on managing maintenance. I know Mike is back, and I'm not trying to start anything, but I don't think an MU2 is the answer.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2017, 20:09 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/20/09
Posts: 2665
Post Likes: +2242
Company: Jcrane, Inc.
Location: KVES Greenville, OH
Aircraft: C441, RV7A
What's your average trip length in NM?

_________________
Jack
N441M N107XX


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2017, 20:10 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/09
Posts: 4166
Post Likes: +2990
Company: Craft Air Services, LLC
Location: Hertford, NC
Aircraft: D50A
Username Protected wrote:
Old(er) airplanes, as great as they may be, inevitably have more maintenance issues to,deal with. I think Don is trying to save time spent on managing maintenance. I know Mike is back, and I'm not trying to start anything, but I don't think an MU2 is the answer.


As much as this seems like common sense, it certainly hasn't been my observation.

_________________
Who is John Galt?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2017, 20:18 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8729
Post Likes: +9456
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
Craig,

Observation or experience? I understand that in the turbine world things are usually better maintained, and that common sense isn't always, so I'm curious. If dispatch reliability did not improve with newer models you'd think companies with better places to deploy capital than airplanes would not, generally speaking, prefer them.

Not trying to argue, just asking.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2017, 20:43 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/09
Posts: 4166
Post Likes: +2990
Company: Craft Air Services, LLC
Location: Hertford, NC
Aircraft: D50A
Username Protected wrote:
Craig,

Observation or experience? I understand that in the turbine world things are usually better maintained, and that common sense isn't always, so I'm curious. If dispatch reliability did not improve with newer models you'd think companies with better places to deploy capital than airplanes would not, generally speaking, prefer them.

Not trying to argue, just asking.


Observation and experience.

Dispatch reliability is more closely related to build quality, good maintenance, and factory support than it is to age. As an example, I'd put up a very nice forty year old King Air or MU-2 against a new Diamond DA-40NG in a heartbeat.

Many businesses prefer new because it works great for their tax strategy, the warranty gives them some measure of predictability, and conventional wisdom is often times more prevalent than actual aircraft operational knowledge. It also gives the flight department director some clout when he has shiny new aircraft at his disposal.

As a personal anecdote, I recently brought in some help in our operation. I had six aircraft working daylight till dark and the only one that had to shut down for a maintenance related item was a three year old plane with only 1600 total time. All three of mine are over 10K hours and mine personal hack is a 1979 and it never missed a beat.

_________________
Who is John Galt?


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next



Gallagher Aviation, LLC (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.avnav.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.tat-85x100.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.