banner
banner

29 Nov 2025, 18:36 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 148 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: PC-12 NG or TBM 900?
PostPosted: 23 Jul 2017, 23:19 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/20/15
Posts: 108
Post Likes: +96
Company: Wellness Medical S.C.
Location: KIGQ
Aircraft: 1982 Cessna R182
Obviously I will keep the old RG, a fantastic airplane for long range/load/ ILS flying/ stable and just about bullet proof but I need to step it up and need a little insight on what these owners love and hate about their magic carpets. Depreciation is great for both so they both hold their respective values better than any other turbo prop. I can just buy a new PC-12 without much ado but I could save a ton with a fractional or partner. I'll be moving to Florida (Naples) area or Sarasota in an aero communities I need to make a move this year. Any suggestions? These would also include good places to live in Florida where I can hanger 2 planes in my garage attached to the house next to the runway.

Thanks in Advance,
Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC-12 NG or TBM 900?
PostPosted: 23 Jul 2017, 23:23 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14428
Post Likes: +9558
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
Just spent 5 hrs in the NG, and every time I fly it I love it more. It's such a great airplane. That said, the TBM 900 is awesome too, and faster. I think it all comes down to how many people you need to haul. If you're going to regularly take 5 or more, get the PC12.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC-12 NG or TBM 900?
PostPosted: 23 Jul 2017, 23:49 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/20/15
Posts: 108
Post Likes: +96
Company: Wellness Medical S.C.
Location: KIGQ
Aircraft: 1982 Cessna R182
I really like the 900's numbers but I'm 6'6" and that makes it a pain in that small cabin, the PC-12 is a dream for guys my size but the extra costs might not be worth it


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC-12 NG or TBM 900?
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2017, 00:21 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/29/12
Posts: 674
Post Likes: +263
The size of the load should give you an answer.

How do you fit in the Cessna 182?

Rgs

Patrick


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC-12 NG or TBM 900?
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2017, 00:31 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/23/09
Posts: 2320
Post Likes: +720
Location: KIKK......Kankakee, Illinois
Aircraft: TBM 850
:popcorn:


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC-12 NG or TBM 900?
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2017, 02:03 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/20/15
Posts: 108
Post Likes: +96
Company: Wellness Medical S.C.
Location: KIGQ
Aircraft: 1982 Cessna R182
If you can't fit in a 182g, you're a freak of nature. At 6'6" I can barely see over the dash and have to pull the seat way up to hit the rudders pedals. I can't imagine anyone flying one under 6' tall without a booster seat.

That being said, the 900 is a real tight fit with load being about the same with more speed, I do plan on trips with more people once retired so the PC-12 would be the best fit but I can always lease one when the need arises I assume and get the 900 for most missions,.

You want to sell your 700 Mike, you live next to me?


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC-12 NG or TBM 900?
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2017, 06:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/03/11
Posts: 2071
Post Likes: +2174
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Pc12 is great, it's just a little slow. The 50 knot difference between the planes is real, especially on headwind days. I don't like flying piston speeds while paying jet A fuel burns.

Bathroom is a big deal though. With female work passengers, we are usually stopping around the 3hr mark no matter what. Oddly enough, my block speeds, with a stop, on 1300mile trips are usually the same as a pc12 with no stop, and I am slightly slower than a tbm900.


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC-12 NG or TBM 900?
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2017, 06:53 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8729
Post Likes: +9456
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
The TBM has full length seat tracks and adjustable rudder pedals so I think you can make it work and be comfortable. The PC 12 cockpit is a bit roomier though I don't think the seat back reclines much if that matters.

Most of these airplanes don't put a lot of thought into the comfort of check writers wh sit up front.

I didn't need the PC12 passenger capacity, the TBM has adequate range for me and I like the extra speed. Both are easy to fly and extremely well built. Look at your needs, figure out which is more comfortable and buy what you want.


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC-12 NG or TBM 900?
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2017, 11:57 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/23/09
Posts: 2320
Post Likes: +720
Location: KIKK......Kankakee, Illinois
Aircraft: TBM 850
Tim,

I need to change that........I sold the 700C2 this past March and currently fly an 850.
If you are in the area look me up!

The C2 was a great plane. The 850 with the G1000 is even better.
Perfect bird for my missions.


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC-12 NG or TBM 900?
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2017, 13:05 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/27/10
Posts: 10790
Post Likes: +6894
Location: Cambridge, MA (KLWM)
Aircraft: 1997 A36TN
Username Protected wrote:
Obviously I will keep the old RG, a fantastic airplane for long range/load/ ILS flying/ stable and just about bullet proof
If you had a PC-12 and an R182 and had a long-range flight with an ILS at the end, would you really take the 182 all that often? Sure, it's a rounding error in the cost department, but it's not in the time and hassle department.

I tend to think the PC-12 will hold its value better. TBM has a semi-frustrating to owners pattern of releasing new models with improvements that put pressure on the value of prior models more than Pilatus' changes.


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC-12 NG or TBM 900?
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2017, 14:05 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
TBM 900 is faster but I think will really drop in value compared to the PC12..... TBM 900 competes with VLJ's more than PC12 does. Even more new VLJ's coming out.

How about a $1.5MM Mustang or Phenom 100 if you're not carrying many people anyways?


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC-12 NG or TBM 900?
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2017, 19:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/16/10
Posts: 2037
Post Likes: +935
Location: Wisconsin
Aircraft: CJ4, AmphibBeaver
I've never flown in either, but I would gravitate towards the PC12. Nothing against the TBM, just think the PC12 has more positive check marks in the comparison.

I agree with JC's comment on jets if payload isn't a dominate factor. I've been pleased with the CJ.


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC-12 NG or TBM 900?
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2017, 19:37 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
I agree with JC's comment on jets if payload isn't a dominate factor. I've been pleased with the CJ.

You get the lav and the cool factor with the jet. TBM's are expensive.


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC-12 NG or TBM 900?
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2017, 21:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/16/10
Posts: 9049
Post Likes: +2086
Username Protected wrote:
You get the lav and the cool factor with the jet. TBM's are expensive.


Yep. Isn't there another 300 for sale just emailed out.

_________________
Education cuts, don't heal.


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC-12 NG or TBM 900?
PostPosted: 24 Jul 2017, 21:58 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14428
Post Likes: +9558
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
Username Protected wrote:
How about a $1.5MM Mustang or Phenom 100 if you're not carrying many people anyways?


I agree. The Pilatus is just awesome because you can take two families. But if you don't need that why not just go twin turbojet. In the 1.5m range there's just a ton of value there.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 148 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next



Gallagher Aviation, LLC (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.sarasota.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.