banner
banner

08 Jul 2025, 17:52 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Concorde Battery (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 218 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 15  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 12 Mar 2017, 22:42 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/20/09
Posts: 2551
Post Likes: +2100
Company: Jcrane, Inc.
Location: KVES Greenville, OH
Aircraft: C441, RV7A
Username Protected wrote:
Nothing, you know what we know :D

Well that sucks.
Are there no options for a curtained or enclosed potty in the back?

_________________
Jack
N441M N107XX
Bubbles Up


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 00:06 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8159
Post Likes: +10512
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
It's a pilots potty!

He can take care of business and still be close to the cockpit in case he needs to fly the airplane!!

:lol:

_________________
Winners don’t whine.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 00:11 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8159
Post Likes: +10512
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
On a serious note, the potty does suck. As far as I know there's no good fix. The airplane truly is a pilot's airplane. Passengers like it less than pilots.

The door is next to the pilot seat, so is the potty.

It's quieter up front than in the back.

IMHO it's more fun to fly than any airplane except for a Walter Extra 300!

The maintenance on a Gulfstream Commander would be less than a MU2... they were probably comparing the MU2 with the Rockwell airplanes.

I never like it when people use the potty anyway. :dancing:

_________________
Winners don’t whine.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 00:15 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/05/15
Posts: 381
Post Likes: +104
Location: KSLC
Aircraft: Divorced: AC690A-10
Username Protected wrote:
It's a pilots potty!

He can take care of business and still be close to the cockpit in case he needs to fly the airplane!!

:lol:


I'll wager it's been used to that effect more times than anyone can count.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 00:25 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8159
Post Likes: +10512
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
We use to say "when it's packed full of cocaine you couldn't get to the potty if it were anywhere else!"

_________________
Winners don’t whine.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 01:18 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20438
Post Likes: +25708
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I doubt the MU-2 cost less.

Mine has.

Quote:
As Thomas describe there are multiple steps to getting the MU-2 confiquired during a OEI procedure.

Most turbo props are much simpler and the Commander is one of the simplest during OEI.

What does an MU2 pilot have to do that a Commander one doesn't?

Engines are the same, so feather, beta follow up are the same.

Plane has to be trimmed.

Shutdown list will be similar with generator, bleed air, etc.

So, what am I doing that you are not?

Just curious.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 05:39 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/12
Posts: 610
Post Likes: +279
Location: London
Aircraft: TC690A
Username Protected wrote:
Just for reference the last 150 hr on my commander cost 13k at Naples jet center not a cheap shop. I doubt the MU-2 cost less. In reality it all depends on the how good the airplane is you bought.

The MU-2 handles TO engine failures just like other turbine IF you are comparing it to jets. Except of course the jet has a lot more power and maybe another crew-member.

The commander climbs quite a bit better than a MU-2 on one engine. The climb gradient is substainsionally better.

As Thomas describe there are multiple steps to getting the MU-2 confiquired during a OEI procedure.

Most turbo props are much simpler and the Commander is one of the simplest during OEI.

My insurance is $7500 for 5 million smooth on a 1.2 million hull.

The commander is pretty cheap to run for a turbo prop, of course it really all depends.


Steve,

How much turbine time/twin time did you have to get a premium that low for that much coverage? Just got a quote back for my first twin that was considerably higher and half the liability and hull value. Who did you use to write your coverage?


FWIW, I initially was dealing with an insurance agent that was pretty worthless and only came back with one quotation at ridiculously high rates when I looked to get coverage on my first twin, a Baron 58, as I was a newly minted multi rating holder. I called up Tom Hauge, who is an active participant here, and ended up getting multiple quotes at 1/2 the premium I was elsewhere quoted. I couldn't be happier with the number of quotes and the service I've gotten from Tom and his team. I'm at the opposite end of the experience spectrum from Steve, having only begun flying 5 or 6 years ago.

When I went to upgrade from piston twin to turbine twin a year or so later, the turbine twin quotations (for my Turbo Commander 690A) came in at a similar dollar price to what I was been paying for my Baron 58 coverage, despite the hull value being ~2x the amount. I was expecting my turbine twin coverage to be more than the piston twin but the underwriters don't seem to see the risk that way, based on my limited data points.

For my Baron and now for my TC 690A, I paid or pay around what Steve pays, albeit with 1/2 the hull value (my mid-life -5 engines and shorter bodied TC versus Steve's beautiful bird with the new -10s).

Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 11:32 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/26/16
Posts: 17
Post Likes: +2
Location: Europe
Aircraft: B300
What about taxiing the AC690, I've seen many owner saying "oh it's special to taxi a Turbo Commander".
What's special ? is it rudder steering or a steering tiller ?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 12:01 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/12
Posts: 610
Post Likes: +279
Location: London
Aircraft: TC690A
Username Protected wrote:
What about taxiing the AC690, I've seen many owner saying "oh it's special to taxi a Turbo Commander".
What's special ? is it rudder steering or a steering tiller ?

Nosewheel steering is controlled through the top portion of the rudder pedals for the first bit of travel on top of the rudder pedals which is also the brakes for the rest of the travel.
Movement of the full range of motion of the full rudder pedals moves only the rudder, which is huge and prone to being blown around, especially with a gusting strong crosswind, so, when taxiing you need to keep your legs flexed, holding the rudder pedals even with weight through your heels to keep the rudder pedals even and in a neutral position, then you use your toes to activate the nosewheel steering on the top bit of the pedal. The first bit of travel of the top portion of the pedals activates the nosewheel steering or, if more action is needed, activated the brakes if you need to use differential braking.
It takes some time to get used to, especially if you are accustomed to nosewheel steering being the exact same control as rudder. It takes some getting used to and can be difficult, as a beginner, to not hunt around left and right of centerline when taxying, especially at low speeds.
The hardest bit may be describing the mechanics, maybe, as my convoluted text above must demonstrate... In practice, I believe once you have some time, the taxiing becomes second nature. I have days where it is a piece of cake, some days when it isn't...


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 12:03 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8159
Post Likes: +10512
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
What about taxiing the AC690, I've seen many owner saying "oh it's special to taxi a Turbo Commander".
What's special ? is it rudder steering or a steering tiller ?


Neither, it's hydraulic, you use your toes to steer, almost like differential braking. Once you get use to it you'll like it... but it is different.

_________________
Winners don’t whine.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 12:05 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8159
Post Likes: +10512
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
All MU2 owners should love Commanders... what exactly do you think they copied to build the MU2? :duck:

_________________
Winners don’t whine.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 12:12 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/26/16
Posts: 17
Post Likes: +2
Location: Europe
Aircraft: B300
Username Protected wrote:
What about taxiing the AC690, I've seen many owner saying "oh it's special to taxi a Turbo Commander".
What's special ? is it rudder steering or a steering tiller ?

Nosewheel steering is controlled through the top portion of the rudder pedals for the first bit of travel on top of the rudder pedals which is also the brakes for the rest of the travel.
Movement of the full range of motion of the full rudder pedals moves only the rudder, which is huge and prone to being blown around, especially with a gusting strong crosswind, so, when taxiing you need to keep your legs flexed, holding the rudder pedals even with weight through your heels to keep the rudder pedals even and in a neutral position, then you use your toes to activate the nosewheel steering on the top bit of the pedal. The first bit of travel of the top portion of the pedals activates the nosewheel steering or, if more action is needed, activated the brakes if you need to use differential braking.
It takes some time to get used to, especially if you are accustomed to nosewheel steering being the exact same control as rudder. It takes some getting used to and can be difficult, as a beginner, to not hunt around left and right of centerline when taxying, especially at low speeds.
The hardest bit may be describing the mechanics, maybe, as my convoluted text above must demonstrate... In practice, I believe once you have some time, the taxiing becomes second nature. I have days where it is a piece of cake, some days when it isn't...


:eek: what a system ! why to do it simple when you can do it complicate.Then it's one of the "bad part" of the Turbo Commander with refueling.

Last edited on 13 Mar 2017, 13:46, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 12:18 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/12
Posts: 610
Post Likes: +279
Location: London
Aircraft: TC690A
Cedric, it is pretty simple but I'm suspecting my explanation has made it seem more complicated. With the system movement of the rudder is not directly connected to the nosewheel, which allows you to isolate movement of the rudder with interior and exterior rudder locks being installed, but still move the nosewheel around to tow the aircraft. It is a little different but reasonably intuitive to use once you are accustomed. Look, Chip managed to explain it in a few words and I used multiple paragraphs...


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 12:24 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/26/16
Posts: 17
Post Likes: +2
Location: Europe
Aircraft: B300
get it:
rudder is rudder, no action on steering. Steering will be on top of rudder, close to brake, you push top left to steer to left ?
Still a weird system.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 13 Mar 2017, 12:24 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8159
Post Likes: +10512
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Yes, the system itself is very simple... less complicated than many nose wheel steering systems.

It is also necessary... that rudder is big. That rudder is why losing an engine on a Commander is not a challenge... you have plenty of control... but I wouldn't want it attached to the nosewheel, lest the tail wag the dog.

You mentioned refueling? An issue there?

_________________
Winners don’t whine.


Last edited on 13 Mar 2017, 12:25, edited 1 time in total.

Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 218 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 15  Next



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.tat-85x100.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.AAI.jpg.