09 Jul 2025, 19:19 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 09:47 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 2931 Post Likes: +5604 Location: Portland, OR
Aircraft: Prusinski'ing
|
|
Huh, I never thought I would read a plane comparison based on [the inoffensive and often delightful differences of assorted peoples and places], least of all here. It's like [a time where people were often sensitive or even hostile to the differences of peoples of different origins] called to discuss planes from [a time when many aircraft were manufactured] in [today]. What sort of Jet would [a personage of questionable sensitivity to inequality across ethnic lines, and possibly wearing a pointy-headed bedsheet] acquire? Edited to be less inflammatory. Because I care. Coming to a United Colors of Benetton ad near you. 
Last edited on 07 Mar 2017, 11:28, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:13 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20442 Post Likes: +25715 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I do, but a good spirited debate keeps one sharp. "Hmm, phone's not ringing, slow sales day. What can I do to put my name in front of more people? I know, let me start bashing other airplanes on BT and see what happens. That ought to be good for at least 20 posts where I can display my 'expertise' and maybe drum up some business. If nothing else, maybe I'll stop losing King Air sales to that evil rice rocket..." Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:19 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6652 Post Likes: +5960 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I do, but a good spirited debate keeps one sharp. "Hmm, phone's not ringing, slow sales day. What can I do to put my name in front of more people? I know, let me start bashing other airplanes on BT and see what happens. That ought to be good for at least 20 posts where I can display my 'expertise' and maybe drum up some business. If nothing else, maybe I'll stop losing King Air sales to that evil rice rocket..." Mike C.
Except he'd scare away MU-2 owners, and perhaps some others, so not sure that's the motive.
_________________ Without love, where would you be now?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:26 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/21/09 Posts: 693 Post Likes: +40 Location: KBJC
Aircraft: MU-2B-60
|
|
James, I'm flying a Marquise. It's a nicely equipped example with great interior, G600/530W/430W. I'm loving it so far. The cabin is very large, comfortable and wide. I think the PC12, Merlin, and Marquise are the TP leaders in this respect. All three have flat floor and a wide cross-section.
The Marquise is noticeably slower than a Solitaire. I see 270kts to 295kts depending on weight/alt/temp, but I almost never see 300kts. The reality is that even on a 3hr trip, that difference is only a few minutes though, 10-15 min max. The -10 Commander is probably faster in cruise, and certainly so up high, but my guess is the ground speed will be slower during the climb so in the end the block times will likely be very close.
I've never flown a Commander so I cannot give a valuable comparison. The owners I've talked to loved them. You can bet the Commander will have better high altitude performance and better SE performance, and get to altitude faster. I think the Mitts will win on slogging through turbulence and cabin comfort.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/08/12 Posts: 1445 Post Likes: +940
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Huh, I never thought I would read a plane comparison based on racism, least of all here. It's like the 1950s called to discuss planes from the 1970s in the 2010s.
What sort of Jet would David Duke acquire? What?! Are you serious?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:43 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 2931 Post Likes: +5604 Location: Portland, OR
Aircraft: Prusinski'ing
|
|
I feel like your question is at least partially directed at me. Here are the quotes: Quote: I have been nice about the Mitsubishi MU2 on this forum... but the Commander is a better airplane... no one got in a Mits and flew it halfway across the country on one engine... AND the Turbo Commander was built in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma... where was the Mits built?
This is not a US built airplane designed and manufactured by a US company like the Rockwell and later Gulfstream Commander built in Bethany, Oklahoma... designed by a US aviation legend like Ted Smith. This is a Japanese airplane assembled in the US. I summarized those remarks to be telling me: When comparing a Mitsubishi MU-2 to a Commander, you favor the Commander because: 1. It was once flown across the country on one engine. 2. It is not a Japanese airplane. (Both being built in the US) I may have misunderstood your meaning. Did you not mean to suggest the Mitsubishi aircraft was inferior because it was "a Japanese airplane" ?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:46 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3304
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I feel like your question is at least partially directed at me.
Irish humor is the best.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/08/12 Posts: 1445 Post Likes: +940
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I feel like your question is at least partially directed at me. Here are the quotes: Quote: I have been nice about the Mitsubishi MU2 on this forum... but the Commander is a better airplane... no one got in a Mits and flew it halfway across the country on one engine... AND the Turbo Commander was built in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma... where was the Mits built?
This is not a US built airplane designed and manufactured by a US company like the Rockwell and later Gulfstream Commander built in Bethany, Oklahoma... designed by a US aviation legend like Ted Smith. This is a Japanese airplane assembled in the US. I summarized those remarks to be telling me: When comparing a Mitsubishi MU-2 to a Commander, you favor the Commander because: 1. It was once flown across the country on one engine. 2. It is not a Japanese airplane. (Both being built in the US) I may have misunderstood your meaning. Did you not mean to suggest the Mitsubishi aircraft was inferior because it was "a Japanese airplane" ? Green text is your friend.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 11:00 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/23/08 Posts: 7357 Post Likes: +4088 Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx. Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
|
|
For the record... I flew our Mitz ALL the way across the entire County on one engine. I think being a pilot does help when choosing airplanes but certainly not required as there are many other factors. Cabin size, wing loading, Delta-P, stairs vs direct entry, hangar size. Fact is they all share basically the same systems (engine, ACM, Avx, A/P). And few of us are doing the heavy wrenching, and mechanics bitch about airplanes more than pilots bitch about early descent clearances. A good mission and needs analysis will usually point you squarely at the right airplane.
_________________ Tom Johnson-Az/Wy AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com C: 602-628-2701
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 11:02 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8160 Post Likes: +10517 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I feel like your question is at least partially directed at me. Here are the quotes: Quote: I have been nice about the Mitsubishi MU2 on this forum... but the Commander is a better airplane... no one got in a Mits and flew it halfway across the country on one engine... AND the Turbo Commander was built in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma... where was the Mits built?
This is not a US built airplane designed and manufactured by a US company like the Rockwell and later Gulfstream Commander built in Bethany, Oklahoma... designed by a US aviation legend like Ted Smith. This is a Japanese airplane assembled in the US. I summarized those remarks to be telling me: When comparing a Mitsubishi MU-2 to a Commander, you favor the Commander because: 1. It was once flown across the country on one engine. 2. It is not a Japanese airplane. (Both being built in the US) I may have misunderstood your meaning. Did you not mean to suggest the Mitsubishi aircraft was inferior because it was "a Japanese airplane" ? If you read some of my other comments and knew more about my history you'd understand. My love of Commanders goes beyond the machine, it started with Ted Smith... a genius, an aviation hero. It's an American success story. The first airplane deal I was ever involved in was a 690B Commander. My early days in aviation were primarily Garrett powered airplanes, the Mits, the Commander and the Merlin. All three great airplanes in their own right. The Merlin has somewhat of a story... the Mits has none that I am aware of... The Commander... WOW! From Ted Smith to Bob Hoover... the TC is iconic! The Shrike Commander is a thing of essential beauty. I spent those early years of my aviation career traveling to Oklahoma City, walking the ramp at Downtown Airpark... hanging out with guys like Ron Farish and Dave Amis III, staying at the Embassy Suites because of free drinks at happy hour. Bruce Byerly, Matt Hagens, RJ Gomez... it was a big, sometimes dysfunctional family. I was just a distant cousin... but all of those guys made me feel welcome and shared their knowledge and experience with a green kid that loved airplanes. If being a Turbo Commander loving, aviation history loving American makes me a racist... then I guess I'm guilty. BTW... one of my favorite jets is the Mitsubishi Beechjet 400A... but we'll save that for another thread.
_________________ Winners don’t whine.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 11:14 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/08/12 Posts: 1445 Post Likes: +940
|
|
Quote: If being a Turbo Commander loving, aviation history loving American makes me a racist... then I guess I'm guilty. This is nuts! Discussing where an airplane is manufactured and assembled is "racist"? Then a sharp turn to "David Duke"? WTF? Some people are just looking for a reason to be offended. 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane Posted: 07 Mar 2017, 11:21 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 2931 Post Likes: +5604 Location: Portland, OR
Aircraft: Prusinski'ing
|
|
I'm as white male privileged as they get, and seldom offended. IF you wanted to say "rah rah Ted Smith is amazing", that's all good and agreeable, and I think a perfectly fine reason to favor a plane. Instead, you took three opportunities to point out that the MU-2 was Japanese. That's all I was keying on. I found it strange. It resonated in a way that I thought you didn't intend, and wanted to point it out as a potential gaffe. I think I was wrong, and there was no gaffe. 
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|