banner
banner

09 Jul 2025, 19:19 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Concorde Battery (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 218 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 15  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2017, 09:47 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 2931
Post Likes: +5604
Location: Portland, OR
Aircraft: Prusinski'ing
Huh, I never thought I would read a plane comparison based on [the inoffensive and often delightful differences of assorted peoples and places], least of all here. It's like [a time where people were often sensitive or even hostile to the differences of peoples of different origins] called to discuss planes from [a time when many aircraft were manufactured] in [today].

What sort of Jet would [a personage of questionable sensitivity to inequality across ethnic lines, and possibly wearing a pointy-headed bedsheet] acquire?

Edited to be less inflammatory. Because I care. Coming to a United Colors of Benetton ad near you. :peace:


Last edited on 07 Mar 2017, 11:28, edited 2 times in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:13 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20442
Post Likes: +25715
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I do, but a good spirited debate keeps one sharp.

"Hmm, phone's not ringing, slow sales day. What can I do to put my name in front of more people? I know, let me start bashing other airplanes on BT and see what happens. That ought to be good for at least 20 posts where I can display my 'expertise' and maybe drum up some business. If nothing else, maybe I'll stop losing King Air sales to that evil rice rocket..."

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:19 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6652
Post Likes: +5960
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
Username Protected wrote:
I do, but a good spirited debate keeps one sharp.

"Hmm, phone's not ringing, slow sales day. What can I do to put my name in front of more people? I know, let me start bashing other airplanes on BT and see what happens. That ought to be good for at least 20 posts where I can display my 'expertise' and maybe drum up some business. If nothing else, maybe I'll stop losing King Air sales to that evil rice rocket..."

Mike C.


Except he'd scare away MU-2 owners, and perhaps some others, so not sure that's the motive.
_________________
Without love, where would you be now?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:26 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/21/09
Posts: 693
Post Likes: +40
Location: KBJC
Aircraft: MU-2B-60
James,
I'm flying a Marquise. It's a nicely equipped example with great interior, G600/530W/430W.
I'm loving it so far. The cabin is very large, comfortable and wide. I think the PC12, Merlin, and Marquise are the TP leaders in this respect. All three have flat floor and a wide cross-section.

The Marquise is noticeably slower than a Solitaire. I see 270kts to 295kts depending on weight/alt/temp, but I almost never see 300kts. The reality is that even on a 3hr trip, that difference is only a few minutes though, 10-15 min max. The -10 Commander is probably faster in cruise, and certainly so up high, but my guess is the ground speed will be slower during the climb so in the end the block times will likely be very close.

I've never flown a Commander so I cannot give a valuable comparison. The owners I've talked to loved them. You can bet the Commander will have better high altitude performance and better SE performance, and get to altitude faster. I think the Mitts will win on slogging through turbulence and cabin comfort.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:28 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/07/08
Posts: 5594
Post Likes: +4248
Location: Fort Worth, TX (KFTW)
Aircraft: B200, ex 58P
Regarding cabin size, how do the Commander vs MU2 vs King Air compare in cabin height and width?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:30 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/08/12
Posts: 1445
Post Likes: +940
Username Protected wrote:
Huh, I never thought I would read a plane comparison based on racism, least of all here. It's like the 1950s called to discuss planes from the 1970s in the 2010s.

What sort of Jet would David Duke acquire?


What?! Are you serious?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:35 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8160
Post Likes: +10517
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
I don't believe I bashed the MU2 other than saying I like the Commander better for many reasons.

This thread is about James considering upgrading from the MU2 to the Commander... there are several reasons to do so.

Now I've been called a racist and my motives questioned...

I assure you that we are anything but slow right now. I'm also not concerned about "losing" King Air sales to "rice rockets" (I don't use that term it seems prejudiced) as my primary business is not selling airplanes... King Airs or anything else.

When I did sell airplanes I sold a wide variety of aircraft, but yes King Airs and Citations were the bulk of my experience.

Lets say for the sake of argument that I did bash the Mits (I have before) why is the response a personal attack directed at me?

_________________
Winners don’t whine.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:43 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 2931
Post Likes: +5604
Location: Portland, OR
Aircraft: Prusinski'ing
I feel like your question is at least partially directed at me.

Here are the quotes:

Quote:
I have been nice about the Mitsubishi MU2 on this forum... but the Commander is a better airplane... no one got in a Mits and flew it halfway across the country on one engine... AND the Turbo Commander was built in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma... where was the Mits built?

This is not a US built airplane designed and manufactured by a US company like the Rockwell and later Gulfstream Commander built in Bethany, Oklahoma... designed by a US aviation legend like Ted Smith. This is a Japanese airplane assembled in the US.


I summarized those remarks to be telling me:

When comparing a Mitsubishi MU-2 to a Commander, you favor the Commander because:

1. It was once flown across the country on one engine.

2. It is not a Japanese airplane. (Both being built in the US)

I may have misunderstood your meaning. Did you not mean to suggest the Mitsubishi aircraft was inferior because it was "a Japanese airplane" ?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:46 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4438
Post Likes: +3304
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
Username Protected wrote:
I feel like your question is at least partially directed at me.



:lol: :D :coffee:

Irish humor is the best.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:53 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/08/12
Posts: 1445
Post Likes: +940
Username Protected wrote:
I feel like your question is at least partially directed at me.

Here are the quotes:

Quote:
I have been nice about the Mitsubishi MU2 on this forum... but the Commander is a better airplane... no one got in a Mits and flew it halfway across the country on one engine... AND the Turbo Commander was built in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma... where was the Mits built?

This is not a US built airplane designed and manufactured by a US company like the Rockwell and later Gulfstream Commander built in Bethany, Oklahoma... designed by a US aviation legend like Ted Smith. This is a Japanese airplane assembled in the US.



I summarized those remarks to be telling me:

When comparing a Mitsubishi MU-2 to a Commander, you favor the Commander because:

1. It was once flown across the country on one engine.

2. It is not a Japanese airplane. (Both being built in the US)

I may have misunderstood your meaning. Did you not mean to suggest the Mitsubishi aircraft was inferior because it was "a Japanese airplane" ?


Green text is your friend.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2017, 10:57 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 2931
Post Likes: +5604
Location: Portland, OR
Aircraft: Prusinski'ing
Username Protected wrote:
I feel like your question is at least partially directed at me.



:lol: :D :coffee:

Irish humor is the best.


If I was funny, it was unintentional. :D Chip also feels that his motives are being questioned, which was the part I thought NOT directed at me -- I personally don't care about his motives, or if he flies a darkly painted plane with a callsign of One Six Six Echo Romeo and pulls it out of the hangar by dragging it via rope from his truck bumper.

I just thought it was strange to compare planes on their... ancestry? Is that even a thing for a lump of metal?

Anyway happy to edit my remarks if I was being obtuse and overlooked a reason that we would compare planes strictly on the location of their parent companies and, by association, their aeronautical engineers.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2017, 11:00 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 03/23/08
Posts: 7357
Post Likes: +4088
Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx.
Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
For the record... I flew our Mitz ALL the way across the entire County on one engine. :woot:

I think being a pilot does help when choosing airplanes but certainly not required as there are many other factors. Cabin size, wing loading, Delta-P, stairs vs direct entry, hangar size.

Fact is they all share basically the same systems (engine, ACM, Avx, A/P). And few of us are doing the heavy wrenching, and mechanics bitch about airplanes more than pilots bitch about early descent clearances.

A good mission and needs analysis will usually point you squarely at the right airplane.

_________________
Tom Johnson-Az/Wy
AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance
Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com
C: 602-628-2701


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2017, 11:02 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8160
Post Likes: +10517
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
I feel like your question is at least partially directed at me.

Here are the quotes:

Quote:
I have been nice about the Mitsubishi MU2 on this forum... but the Commander is a better airplane... no one got in a Mits and flew it halfway across the country on one engine... AND the Turbo Commander was built in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma... where was the Mits built?

This is not a US built airplane designed and manufactured by a US company like the Rockwell and later Gulfstream Commander built in Bethany, Oklahoma... designed by a US aviation legend like Ted Smith. This is a Japanese airplane assembled in the US.


I summarized those remarks to be telling me:

When comparing a Mitsubishi MU-2 to a Commander, you favor the Commander because:

1. It was once flown across the country on one engine.

2. It is not a Japanese airplane. (Both being built in the US)

I may have misunderstood your meaning. Did you not mean to suggest the Mitsubishi aircraft was inferior because it was "a Japanese airplane" ?


If you read some of my other comments and knew more about my history you'd understand.

My love of Commanders goes beyond the machine, it started with Ted Smith... a genius, an aviation hero. It's an American success story. The first airplane deal I was ever involved in was a 690B Commander.

My early days in aviation were primarily Garrett powered airplanes, the Mits, the Commander and the Merlin. All three great airplanes in their own right. The Merlin has somewhat of a story... the Mits has none that I am aware of...

The Commander... WOW!

From Ted Smith to Bob Hoover... the TC is iconic!

The Shrike Commander is a thing of essential beauty.

I spent those early years of my aviation career traveling to Oklahoma City, walking the ramp at Downtown Airpark... hanging out with guys like Ron Farish and Dave Amis III, staying at the Embassy Suites because of free drinks at happy hour.

Bruce Byerly, Matt Hagens, RJ Gomez... it was a big, sometimes dysfunctional family. I was just a distant cousin... but all of those guys made me feel welcome and shared their knowledge and experience with a green kid that loved airplanes.

If being a Turbo Commander loving, aviation history loving American makes me a racist... then I guess I'm guilty.

BTW... one of my favorite jets is the Mitsubishi Beechjet 400A... but we'll save that for another thread.

_________________
Winners don’t whine.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2017, 11:14 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/08/12
Posts: 1445
Post Likes: +940
Quote:
If being a Turbo Commander loving, aviation history loving American makes me a racist... then I guess I'm guilty.


This is nuts! Discussing where an airplane is manufactured and assembled is "racist"? Then a sharp turn to "David Duke"? WTF?

Some people are just looking for a reason to be offended. :hammer:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Considering a Turbo Commander for my next plane
PostPosted: 07 Mar 2017, 11:21 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 2931
Post Likes: +5604
Location: Portland, OR
Aircraft: Prusinski'ing
I'm as white male privileged as they get, and seldom offended.

IF you wanted to say "rah rah Ted Smith is amazing", that's all good and agreeable, and I think a perfectly fine reason to favor a plane.

Instead, you took three opportunities to point out that the MU-2 was Japanese. That's all I was keying on. I found it strange. It resonated in a way that I thought you didn't intend, and wanted to point it out as a potential gaffe. I think I was wrong, and there was no gaffe.

:shrug:


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 218 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 15  Next



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.