01 Dec 2025, 08:08 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: V-8 Commander  Posted: 15 Jan 2017, 18:22 |
|
 |
|
|
Joined: 07/02/13
Posts: 3161
Post Likes: +3090
Location: Stamping Ground, Ky
Aircraft: twin bonanza
|
|
|
Here ya go.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: V-8 Commander Posted: 15 Jan 2017, 20:10 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 08/09/11
Posts: 2070
Post Likes: +2875
Company: Naples Jet Center
Location: KAPF KPIA
Aircraft: EMB500 AC95 AEST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Here ya go. Now Jim, ya know that's a Commander 685 and not King Air, right?  Honestly the 685 could not really get any worse so the V8 could have been a positive but I really did get a chuckle when I saw it on a King Air. In no universe ever does it make sense to spend money removing jet fuel burning round rotating parts in favor of 32 spark plugs helping 16 pistons remove themselves from their crankshaft based prison. Cool looking engine though. Best in a street rod I'm thinking ...
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: V-8 Commander Posted: 15 Jan 2017, 20:22 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 12/26/08
Posts: 3413
Post Likes: +1055
Location: --------- Charlotte, NC (KEQY) Alva, OK (KAVK)
Aircraft: 70 A36TN, Build RV8
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Here ya go. Now Jim, ya know that's a Commander 685 and not King Air, right? Honestly the 685 could not really get any worse so the V8 could have been a positive but I really did get a chuckle when I saw it on a King Air. In no universe ever does it make sense to spend money removing jet fuel burning round rotating parts in favor of 32 spark plugs helping 16 pistons remove themselves from their crankshaft based prison. Cool looking engine though. Best in a street rod I'm thinking ...
OTOH, how can posting a pic of a Commander with a V-8 rather than a King Air not be relevant in a thread titled V-8 Commander? Not sure why the Commander pic is in question? Shirley I have to go back and see where this one changed to debating V-8s on King-airs
_________________
I had my patience tested. I'm negative.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: V-8 Commander Posted: 15 Jan 2017, 20:47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/09/11
Posts: 2070
Post Likes: +2875
Company: Naples Jet Center
Location: KAPF KPIA
Aircraft: EMB500 AC95 AEST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Not sure why the Commander pic is in question? Shirley I have to go back and see where this one changed to debating V-8s on King-airs Of course it's relevant. I just asked for pics of the King Air. And don't call me Shirley lol. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: V-8 Commander Posted: 15 Jan 2017, 22:39 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/23/08
Posts: 6063
Post Likes: +716
Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
Bruce, its get even worst. They say they want to put this engine on a Caravan at 750 hp. I wonder what they smoke in Texas.  Username Protected wrote: Here ya go. Now Jim, ya know that's a Commander 685 and not King Air, right? Honestly the 685 could not really get any worse so the V8 could have been a positive but I really did get a chuckle when I saw it on a King Air. In no universe ever does it make sense to spend money removing jet fuel burning round rotating parts in favor of 32 spark plugs helping 16 pistons remove themselves from their crankshaft based prison. Cool looking engine though. Best in a street rod I'm thinking ...
_________________
Former Baron 58 owner.
Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: V-8 Commander Posted: 16 Jan 2017, 09:31 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 07/02/13
Posts: 3161
Post Likes: +3090
Location: Stamping Ground, Ky
Aircraft: twin bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Here ya go. Now Jim, ya know that's a Commander 685 and not King Air, right? Honestly the 685 could not really get any worse so the V8 could have been a positive but I really did get a chuckle when I saw it on a King Air. In no universe ever does it make sense to spend money removing jet fuel burning round rotating parts in favor of 32 spark plugs helping 16 pistons remove themselves from their crankshaft based prison. Cool looking engine though. Best in a street rod I'm thinking ...
Completely missed your segue to the King Air installation. I was locked in on the V8 commander topic.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: V-8 Commander Posted: 17 Jan 2017, 13:56 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 07/02/13
Posts: 3161
Post Likes: +3090
Location: Stamping Ground, Ky
Aircraft: twin bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Completely missed your segue to the King Air installation. I was locked in on the V8 commander topic. Yeah, thread drift like that is pretty unusual on BT.
Sure enough. Been guilty myself. I just missed the King Air reference 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|
