Username Protected wrote:
I'm out at ProFlight for recurrent training. I got them to let me spend an hour in the CJ3 sim. I was curious both about what that level of sim is like & what the plane flies like. Eye opening experience. What a piece of hardware (both the sim...and the plane).
Clay, I moved from a Cessna 425 to a CJ2+. Get a few flights under your belt and it will not feel so overwhelming. A turbojet does have a lot more performance to manage then a turboprop. And the plane is a lot easier to fly then the sim.
Quote:
I have a number of thoughts from the experience that have changed some of my thinking about the move to a jet:
1. "A Citation is just a Skyhawk with jets" / "Easier to fly than your prop" / "No problem" .... I think these are all gross exaggerations. First, the thing takes off down the runway like a rocket. Next, you're climbing at 7,000 ft/min.
So pull the power back. If you are real light you can see a 4000 - 6000 fpm climb. More normal climb rate can be 3000 - 4000 fpm from SL when cold and light. Once you learn a bit about using the throttles you can fly a CJ3 at Conquest speeds and rates until you get used to all the performance.
One tip I give transitioning pilots is slow the plane down if it is getting ahead of you. A CJ3 will fly just fine at 160 - 180 kts if you need it to.
Your Conquest flies within an envelope of 120kts - 250kts. In the CJ3 you need to manage within an envelope of 98kts - 410kts.
Quote:
All of the systems are pretty complicated. There's no comparison to the Conquest.
Actually you will find that much of your 425 systems knowledge will transfer to the Citation. Cessna used much of the same systems design across their planes. Landing gear system in the CJ3 and the emergency blow down procedure is almost exactly the same as your 425. Hydraulic systems is largely the same. Electrical systems is very similar. Biggest change is in the FADEC controlled engines and the Proline 21 avionics.
Quote:
2. Avionics. I thought I understood what a big deal this is. I didn't. ProLine 21 is an entirely different world. Now I know what they mean by "head down time". I have always been a GA / Garmin guy, so this is an entirely different world. I think you have to seriously consider whether you want your first step to a jet to include this challenge as well. As soon as I got out of the sim and started thinking about it, I started thinking "Maybe I want an older jet with steam gauges / Garmin stuff?" Or, maybe I want a jet with new Garmin stuff. I'm not sure if making the ProLine transition sounds like that much fun. I love a challenge, but this seems like a lot to add to the first jet transition. It also seems like a lot of required button pushing for a single pilot setup. Given I'm only interested in SP, this is a big consideration for me.
Integrated Proline 21/FMS3000 is lower workload for a SP then a steam gauge/Garmin cockpit. You just have to fly right seat for a few hours and learn how to set it up. You can't judge it when stepping cold into the cockpit.
Quote:
Now I understand why a type rating takes as long as it does. It was kind of fun to see how it feels to be that far behind the airplane and how much I have to learn - especially safely in a sim.
You know how to fly a plane. There are a few new things to learn in the transition:
- Managing turbojet engines
- Aerodynamics of turbojets
- New avionics systems
- Flying to ATP standards
Getting typed in a CJ3 will be no more difficult then any other Citation.