27 Nov 2025, 07:07 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Which MU2? Posted: 04 Oct 2014, 17:43 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/18/13 Posts: 1152 Post Likes: +770
Aircraft: 737
|
|
|
Ok, I'm done chasing around Merlins. The only one I want is a rare bird indeed and it's only for sale by one guy who is about 200k off on his price and doesn't understand what a negotiation is. After shuffling my routes around, I can make this work with my longest westbound leg at 750isn NM and my longest eastbound leg at 950ish. The MU2 will do that all day.
I definitely want a long body, and I was thinking a Marquise, but looking at the performance data, it seems the J model is the best performer for single engine or normal rate of climb even though it only has -6 engines; it also uses less runway. I'm also aware that often times the paperwork doesn't reflect the reality, so which model is the one to have if you're in the market for a long body?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Which MU2? Posted: 04 Oct 2014, 18:10 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Ok, I'm done chasing around Merlins. The only one I want is a rare bird indeed and it's only for sale by one guy who is about 200k off on his price and doesn't understand what a negotiation is. When you find that splecial MU2 make sure you don't forget to tell the owner what it is worth, that way he hopefully won't be suprised by your low balling. Oh, and don't forget to tell the trainers, mechanics and insurance people what they are allowed to charge, as I am sure they all really have no clue either.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Which MU2? Posted: 04 Oct 2014, 18:14 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/23/12 Posts: 2419 Post Likes: +3029 Company: CSRA Document Solutions Location: Aiken, SC KAIK
|
|
I cannot add anything about MU2's other than they service and restore a lot of them here at my home field. Their customers seems quite pleased with their purchases and how they are treated. http://www.air1st.comGood Luck! Don
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Which MU2? Posted: 04 Oct 2014, 18:18 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/18/13 Posts: 1152 Post Likes: +770
Aircraft: 737
|
|
|
Here's the data I got from Reese Howell's website. For those who don't know, Reese is the man when it comes to MU2s. If he put it up, it believe it's accurate.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Which MU2? Posted: 04 Oct 2014, 19:31 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/18/13 Posts: 1152 Post Likes: +770
Aircraft: 737
|
|
|
Thanks, I can't wait until Monday to speak with him. I actually went flying in a Marquise with him, the only real difference I noted in flying on one engine from a normal bird was you don't use the stick and you better be quick to trim the rudder. I didn't think it was that bad...I'm really glad this bird is going to work out for my mission, I really like it.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Which MU2? Posted: 04 Oct 2014, 20:17 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/18/13 Posts: 1152 Post Likes: +770
Aircraft: 737
|
|
|
Ok Dr. Barnes, thanks for clearing the way. I just spoke with Reese, he set me straight.
For anybody out there wondering what the answer is, here's the deal: the J model is capable of all that because even with the lower power it's still got better power to weight because it has -6s with a max power of 1330HP and a max TO weight of 10,800. The Marquise has -10s; max power is 1430HP with a max TO weight of 11,575. The -10s really just allow more power up at altitude.
If you load a Marquise within the envelope of a J model you'll blow the doors off the J model in all categories.
Guess who's buying a Marquise?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Which MU2? Posted: 05 Oct 2014, 01:43 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/09/11 Posts: 652 Post Likes: +102 Company: Aero Teknic Inc. Location: CYHU / Montreal St-Hubert
Aircraft: MU-2B-60, SR22,C182Q
|
|
|
I fly one of the last Marquise built, with the Sperry SPZ-500 autopilot. These are hard to find (serial numbers 1500S.A. and above). The useful load is fantastic, we even got the toilet flushing to work again.
The hardest thing about getting into an MU-2 (other than finding one) is the training. I found the MU-2 SFAR 108 training to be harder than getting a type rating on a modern Lear, as you are expected to be able to do everything by yourself, without a co-pilot. I now firmly believe that if you can fly an MU-2 properly (especially single engine), you can flight anything.
I suggest you join the MU-2 mailing list, lots of knowledge to be had there. Expect to have to do some mentoring time, even if you have a zillion hours on turboprops or jets. I would fly with a co-pilot regardless for the first year, the workload is very high on the MU-2.
The Marquise is subject to a 2400 hour structural inspection that will likely become an AD. I suggest getting that inspection done as part of a pre-buy to cover yourself.
-Pascal
_________________ http://www.wi-flight.net/
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Which MU2? Posted: 05 Oct 2014, 07:04 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/08/12 Posts: 12581 Post Likes: +5190 Company: Mayo Clinic Location: Rochester, MN
Aircraft: Planeless in RST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Ok Dr. Barnes, thanks for clearing the way. I just spoke with Reese, he set me straight.
For anybody out there wondering what the answer is, here's the deal: the J model is capable of all that because even with the lower power it's still got better power to weight because it has -6s with a max power of 1330HP and a max TO weight of 10,800. The Marquise has -10s; max power is 1430HP with a max TO weight of 11,575. The -10s really just allow more power up at altitude.
If you load a Marquise within the envelope of a J model you'll blow the doors off the J model in all categories.
Guess who's buying a Marquise? Who?? 
_________________ BFR 8/18; IPC 8/18
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Which MU2? Posted: 05 Oct 2014, 10:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5309 Post Likes: +5298
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
|
|
|
Unless you just need the space a mu2 offers, for the same money you can get an early eclipse jet thats faster, more modern, safer and burns less fuel. But, if you need the space, you need the space. I like mu2s, i spent a lot of time hanging out with a mu2 camper at osh this year and its a really well made and impressive bird. That was my first choice before getting talked into an eclipse.
Bullish on eclipses, check them out. I know of a not advertised creampuff for sale in the 650 range, pm me.
Mike
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Which MU2? Posted: 05 Oct 2014, 10:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13631 Post Likes: +7766 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Unless you just need the space a mu2 offers, for the same money you can get an early eclipse jet thats faster, more modern, safer and burns less fuel. But, if you need the space, you need the space. I like mu2s, i spent a lot of time hanging out with a mu2 camper at osh this year and its a really well made and impressive bird. That was my first choice before getting talked into an eclipse.
Bullish on eclipses, check them out. I know of a not advertised creampuff for sale in the 650 range, pm me.
Mike I thought these were possibly turning into pumpkins....has something changed?
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|