banner
banner

15 Nov 2025, 04:30 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions
PostPosted: 30 Nov 2011, 10:08 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/15/09
Posts: 204
Post Likes: +9
Location: Sheridan, WY KSHR
Aircraft: 601P/Superstar 700
Looking for input/experience with running the 414 at long range cruise settings instead of "go fast" mode. Fuel burn, power settings, altitude at what indicated airspeed and true air speed?

Assuming about 1.2 - 1.3 X best glide for best long range cruise indicated airspeed. Would plan on running LOP (with JPI and GAMIS of course) even though RAM is opposed to LOP operations.

The 414 is not subject to the spar A.D. but has several exhaust A.D.s. Also sounds like the landing gear needs to be rigged each year by a knowledgeable shop. Surprisingly good accelerate/stop distance of 3,000'. Wondering how the landing gear would be on good for occasional landings on good condition dirt/grass strips? Assuming a well maintained airframe, can annuals expected to be in the $5K - $10K range? Any big expense "gotchas" to know about? Guessing about the same cost to run a 414 as a P58 Baron (owned a P for about 700 hours).

Thanks for your input.

Tom


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions
PostPosted: 30 Nov 2011, 11:26 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/17/08
Posts: 14067
Post Likes: +3793
Company: Orion Endeavors Inc.
Location: Gulf Shores, AL (KJKA)
Aircraft: 1982 Baron 58P
Hi Tom

Can't really answer your 'cost' question, but I would suggest you take a little closer look at the Cessna exhaust system and its recurring inspection requirements. Unlike the P Baron you are familiar with, those Cessna installations mount the turbo on the spar. The exhaust from the engine is routed through a bunch of ball joints that are necessary to handle engine movement relative to the fixed turbo, hence the frequent inspection requirement because you don't want to blow torch the spar when a leak occurs. All those 1600dF+ pipes moving around relative to the fixed mount turbo is a bit disconcerting to me. YMMV

:cheers:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions
PostPosted: 30 Nov 2011, 12:10 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/12/07
Posts: 23808
Post Likes: +7662
Location: Columbia, SC (KCUB)
Aircraft: 2003 Bonanza A36
I went down this path a couple of years ago and the issue that kept coming up was corrosion. A number of these planes are worthless because of corrosion, but its hard to spot unless you're very knowledgeable about the plane.

_________________
Minister of Ice
Family Motto: If you aren't scared, you're not having fun!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions
PostPosted: 30 Nov 2011, 12:11 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/15/09
Posts: 204
Post Likes: +9
Location: Sheridan, WY KSHR
Aircraft: 601P/Superstar 700
Thank you Don!

Tom


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2011, 09:08 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/23/08
Posts: 6062
Post Likes: +715
Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
The only twin Cessna I would consider would be a 414A or 421C.

Lots of room and payload.

_________________
Former Baron 58 owner.
Pistons engines are for tractors.

Marc Bourdon


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2011, 09:55 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/15/09
Posts: 204
Post Likes: +9
Location: Sheridan, WY KSHR
Aircraft: 601P/Superstar 700
Marc, how about a 414 that has 2,100+ of useful load and RAM VII 335 hp engines? A draw back to the short body 414 is only an alky windshield so not FIKI...but that doesn't matter much to me regarding the way I do my best to avoid/escape inadvertent ice. And the 414 is not subject to the expensive spar A.D. but of course has several exhaust A.D.s.

Tom


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2011, 10:53 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/17/08
Posts: 14067
Post Likes: +3793
Company: Orion Endeavors Inc.
Location: Gulf Shores, AL (KJKA)
Aircraft: 1982 Baron 58P
Hi Tom

Just had an occasion to look at a nice 414 in the shop behind my hangar yesterday. Nice plane, but one thing that caught my eye was the lack of corrosion proofing visible through the inspection plates open in the aft fuselage and wings. Your location should not present any present problems, but since these planes move around the country a lot during their lifetime, one may be exposed to a coastal environment during a previous owners stewardship.

Zinc Chromating all the interior panels like Beech did on many models really helps preserve these wonderful machines much better than just the clad normally applied to the aluminum sheets.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2011, 11:27 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/12/07
Posts: 23808
Post Likes: +7662
Location: Columbia, SC (KCUB)
Aircraft: 2003 Bonanza A36
Username Protected wrote:
Hi Tom

Just had an occasion to look at a nice 414 in the shop behind my hangar yesterday. Nice plane, but one thing that caught my eye was the lack of corrosion proofing visible through the inspection plates open in the aft fuselage and wings. Your location should not present any present problems, but since these planes move around the country a lot during their lifetime, one may be exposed to a coastal environment during a previous owners stewardship.

Zinc Chromating all the interior panels like Beech did on many models really helps preserve these wonderful machines much better than just the clad normally applied to the aluminum sheets.


The corrosion that you mostly need to be concerned about is in the wings. Its hard to spot (I'd suggest using a flexible borescope), but if its present the plane is a yard ornament.

_________________
Minister of Ice
Family Motto: If you aren't scared, you're not having fun!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2011, 21:19 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/19/08
Posts: 560
Post Likes: +22
Location: CYXH - Medicine Hat, AB
Aircraft: DA42
Got your pm Tom and I'll get those long range cruise numbers shortly.
Just a couple clarifications

Late 414's are fiki, my 1976 is.
My 414 has 7 seats and 1900 useful after a re-weigh

I'm already due for my first oil change and have flown over 30 hrs in it last 30 days and have been happy

_________________
Doug Thompson
CPL, ME, IR
CYXH - Medicine Hat, AB


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions
PostPosted: 02 Dec 2011, 14:29 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/07/10
Posts: 223
Location: KONZ
Username Protected wrote:
Hi Tom

Can't really answer your 'cost' question, but I would suggest you take a little closer look at the Cessna exhaust system and its recurring inspection requirements. Unlike the P Baron you are familiar with, those Cessna installations mount the turbo on the spar. The exhaust from the engine is routed through a bunch of ball joints that are necessary to handle engine movement relative to the fixed turbo, hence the frequent inspection requirement because you don't want to blow torch the spar when a leak occurs. All those 1600dF+ pipes moving around relative to the fixed mount turbo is a bit disconcerting to me. YMMV

:cheers:


+10 on that Don, Flew into Fairfield Iowa once in a 414 ram VII and after landing did my usual walk around look see. Noticed a slight discoloration of the paint where the exhaust was routed....Ended up finding a nickle sized hole in the exhaust after the turbo. The mechanic found the metal was so thin he stuck his finger in the hole and made it the size of a quarter while we watched. Afterwards he turned to me and said, " Had you guys flown back home you'd have blow torched your wing spar". And the plane just came out of annual.... Thankyou Lord

_________________
Mike Long CFI-A/I/M


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions
PostPosted: 03 Dec 2011, 03:03 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/15/09
Posts: 707
Post Likes: +177
Aircraft: 1984 B36TC
Username Protected wrote:
Hi Tom

Can't really answer your 'cost' question, but I would suggest you take a little closer look at the Cessna exhaust system and its recurring inspection requirements. Unlike the P Baron you are familiar with, those Cessna installations mount the turbo on the spar. The exhaust from the engine is routed through a bunch of ball joints that are necessary to handle engine movement relative to the fixed turbo, hence the frequent inspection requirement because you don't want to blow torch the spar when a leak occurs. All those 1600dF+ pipes moving around relative to the fixed mount turbo is a bit disconcerting to me. YMMV

:cheers:


+10 on that Don, Flew into Fairfield Iowa once in a 414 ram VII and after landing did my usual walk around look see. Noticed a slight discoloration of the paint where the exhaust was routed....Ended up finding a nickle sized hole in the exhaust after the turbo. The mechanic found the metal was so thin he stuck his finger in the hole and made it the size of a quarter while we watched. Afterwards he turned to me and said, " Had you guys flown back home you'd have blow torched your wing spar". And the plane just came out of annual.... Thankyou Lord


It's just a bad design. Why the turbo isn't bolted to the engine just doesn't make sense. What were they thinking? What was to be gained? Not for me to dangerous.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions
PostPosted: 03 Dec 2011, 09:44 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/23/08
Posts: 6062
Post Likes: +715
Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
Tom,
Im pretty sure that the 414 as the spar AD.
I believe the 414A also as the spar AD at 15000 hrs.
Here is a 414A Ram 4 with 2374 useful load thats been for sale for over 2 years.

http://www.csplane.com/6727.htm

I just like the A without the tip tanks, just nicer and flys better.


Username Protected wrote:
Marc, how about a 414 that has 2,100+ of useful load and RAM VII 335 hp engines? A draw back to the short body 414 is only an alky windshield so not FIKI...but that doesn't matter much to me regarding the way I do my best to avoid/escape inadvertent ice. And the 414 is not subject to the expensive spar A.D. but of course has several exhaust A.D.s.

Tom

_________________
Former Baron 58 owner.
Pistons engines are for tractors.

Marc Bourdon


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions
PostPosted: 03 Dec 2011, 11:27 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/19/08
Posts: 560
Post Likes: +22
Location: CYXH - Medicine Hat, AB
Aircraft: DA42
Marc

Here's a quick breakdown on the Cessna Twin Spar issue :

Cessna 401/401A/402B airplanes with 6,500 hours or more
Cessna 402/402A/402B airplanes with 6,500 hours or more
Cessna 402C airplanes with 14,500 hours or more
Cessna 411/411A airplanes with 5,500 hours or more
Cessna 414A airplanes (to s/n 200) with 8,500 hours or more
Cessna 414A airplanes (s/n 201+) with 14,500 hours or more

I believe that there is a spar strap that is also required on some aircraft at high hours but none of them are the 414. The 414 is very similar to the 340 (or vice versa) which has also been without spar AD's.

_________________
Doug Thompson
CPL, ME, IR
CYXH - Medicine Hat, AB


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions
PostPosted: 04 Dec 2011, 12:40 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/29/07
Posts: 739
Post Likes: +234
Aircraft: Baron 55
I have flown a 414 for 19 years. My 2 cents:

1. A very comfortable ride. Pressure and A/C. They are dirt cheap today.

2. Gotta get this dog up in the flight levels to get the 195kts because it had a WIDE body and will barely make 160 at 10,000.

3. Mine (310hp) got maybe 700 fpm on a good day. Hope your RAM does better.

4. The increased weight from RAM is mostly from the formula used by FARs. If you lower the stall speed which VGs in fact do, the formula computes a higher allowable gross weight. Whether the wings know this number is another matter. Higher horsepower of course is a help.

5. I always used 30 inches and 2100 rpm. It gave a quiet smooth ride, and burned about 15 a side. I block planned for 35 an hour total. Never crashed once.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 414 Ram VII...requesting opinions
PostPosted: 01 Mar 2012, 19:13 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/16/10
Posts: 1287
Post Likes: +458
Location: Prescott, AZ
Aircraft: A36
Why are these planes so cheap? Fuel burn?


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.midwest2.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.sarasota.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.SCA.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.