06 Jul 2025, 13:11 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: LSA Seaplane....? Posted: 22 Aug 2024, 16:00 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 16386 Post Likes: +27606 Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
if you are not a large person, add the Volmer to your list. With a C-90 or a C-85 stroker they aren't bad performers, from the few times I've been in one.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: LSA Seaplane....? Posted: 22 Aug 2024, 19:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/31/16 Posts: 69 Post Likes: +16 Location: Signal Mtn, TN / KCHA
Aircraft: A36, RV-12, exSearey
|
|
We owned a Searey LSX with a C hull (latest gen, kit built) for a couple of years. And had demo flights in the Super Petrel and the Icon A5. The icon a5 flew fine, but was very underpowered. It was begging for a larger engine and I was at Oshkosh and saw a company who offers an upgrade to a 916, which I’m sure makes it much better (and lightens your wallet even more). The super petrel is what I would buy if I wanted icon like fit and finish, a nose wheel, and a factory built plane. It’s way less expensive than the icon and the company is not bankrupt. I have not flown their new version with the larger engine. If you want to buy a Searey, talk to Jim Ratte at https://seareyspecialist.com/. He builds kits, supports the fleet and is a great resource. There is a classic searey vs the LSX. The difference was all the redesign and improvements to make the SLSA (factory built) version are in the LSX kit. Some classics have gotten some of the upgrades. There are 3 generations of hulls. You want the C hul because it is the most stable. Ours was a rotax 914 (turbo) and it was a great performer. Don’t even think about one that does not have a rotax engine. The fit/finish on a searey varies from the factory built and welll done kits to bare bones. Ours was nice, but everything is a little more exposed (which is great for maintenance) than a Super Petrel or Icon. We did not have the engine cover and I was glad about that because it serves no purpose besides looks and weight and getting in the way of maintenance. There is a private owners group that is a good resource, but factory support is limited because the Chinese ownership decided to not further fund the losses and shut things down. Want to buy and airplane company? Tailwheel is a consideration, as well as recognizing that these are lightweight airplanes and really not fun (or safe) to fly on a really windy day. In addition phantom boat wakes and wavy days are not fun. Overall, hull based amphibians are a fun to fly, but remember they do not do well with docks. You want to beach them or pull out on a ramp. I hope that helps!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: LSA Seaplane....? Posted: 22 Aug 2024, 22:32 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/24/19 Posts: 1462 Post Likes: +2054 Location: Ontario, Canada
Aircraft: Glasair Sportsman
|
|
I have zero experience in these types. I have, however, had extensive conversations with a very high-time float pilot (C185, Beaver, Otter and his personal Glasair Sportsman on Aerocet amphibs - a very sweet-handling floatplane). This gentleman has fairly extensive experience in several different Searay airframes, from old hulls to brand new hulls. His comments regarding handling characteristics have pretty much taken the Searay off the menu for me.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: LSA Seaplane....? Posted: 22 Aug 2024, 23:36 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/17/14 Posts: 5929 Post Likes: +2677 Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
|
|
Doc Tarver flies so much heavy iron that he thinks the Widgeon is an LSA.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: LSA Seaplane....? Posted: 23 Aug 2024, 01:18 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/03/15 Posts: 7 Post Likes: +1 Location: Somerset West, ZA
Aircraft: Baron 58
|
|
I have been flying planes on floats for 25 years now Cessna 180 on straight and amphibious floats and a Cessna 206 on amphibious This past June I was able to start flying a Aeroprakt A22 on amphibious floats that particular plane had the 100 hp Rotax which is enough power for it and it had a Garmin 500 AP That LSA in my mind is a great seaplane well behaved and performed just like the heavier ones on water alone in it I was airborne in 450 ft of water in very light wind 2 up it took 850 ft I would suggest you look into these planes the A32 looks even a bit smarter and is slightly faster with the same engine https://aeropraktusa.com/
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: LSA Seaplane....? Posted: 25 Aug 2024, 11:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/12/18 Posts: 521 Post Likes: +590
Aircraft: P35, Pitts S1S
|
|
I have flown a few LSA seaplanes, owned one, and a buddy has flown a few more. I have been recreationally shopping for a new one.
My Ranking:
Legend Cub on Amphibs. It's a CUB... On FLOATS. You can fly from the front and it has a starter. I am quasi actively looking for one.
Rans S7. I didn't like the Amphib system otherwise I might have bough it. Gear system required you to manually pump the gear up or down. I thought about adding an electric pump but at the price point for that plane I didn't want to buy something that was not turn key.
Super Petrel. Everyone I have talked to has told me this is the king of the flying boat list although I have not flown one. Enough people I trust have said this is the top dog that I would seriously consider it.
SeaRey. I have owned a "A" hull and I would not recommend the A. Very quick off the water, but landing the angle of arrival between a bounce or skip and a good landing is very small. I have also flown the "C" hull and loved it. One thing I like about the SeaReys are that either door can be in any position while flying. And you can move them in flight with no problem. As a TW plane, super easy to land. Just make sure the TW is locked or land three point so it has enough speed to slap it straight before trying to turn the plane. I'd buy another under the right conditions.
Super Drifter. I simply love this plane. If I can find a Super Drifter kit with Amphibs I'm gonna have to make space in my hangar. I actually talked to LockWood twice and they say they still make the kit, but then they never follow up with me. Any ones I find for sale are the 2 stroke versions, don't have the amphibs, or seem to be in horrible shape.
Adventura. This one had the best "boat" qualities. In the air the stick forces felt very heavy but it flew fine. I don't like the teleflex cables for elevator control... Can't really point to any one reason, I just don't like them.
Icon. Another I have not personally flown. Fit and finish is great. Everyone says it lacks power. For the price you could buy two SeaReys.
SeaMax. Fastest of the group. Water performance was good. Didn't like the yaw stability, it would yaw off center and you had to actively keep it pointed straight. They have since added additional vertical fins on the horizontal stab... Might make it better. My buddy had trouble finding support and had an issue with de-lamination of the hull and it spent a good amount of time in the shop.
Honorable mention, AirCam on floats. This plane was stupid fun... But at the price I'd buy two other planes. And it is not LSA. I'd get the enclosure. I'd put this after the Cub. If price was equal.... Eh.... Eh, I'd get the Aircam.
My opinion... worth what you paid.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: LSA Seaplane....? Posted: 25 Aug 2024, 17:09 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/11/11 Posts: 1218 Post Likes: +622 Company: FUSION
Aircraft: B300ER B200 C90 DHC6
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Super Petrel. Everyone I have talked to has told me this is the king of the flying boat list although I have not flown one. Enough people I trust have said this is the top dog that I would seriously consider it. I have flown the Super Petrel, very impressive on all surfaces, ocean, beaching, etc. This would be my choice 
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: LSA Seaplane....? Posted: 25 Aug 2024, 20:28 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/12/18 Posts: 521 Post Likes: +590
Aircraft: P35, Pitts S1S
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Nobody ever includes the Lake La-4-200 Buccaneer in these for some reason. Well built planes, easy to fly, certified and has lots of mods. I have a whopping 4 hours in one, but loved it.  Cause I think he was asking about LSA aircraft.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|