banner
banner

27 Jun 2025, 14:00 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: P-51; the H-Model is a Different Plane
PostPosted: 13 Sep 2023, 20:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/22/07
Posts: 14365
Post Likes: +16349
Company: Midwest Chemtrails, LLC
Location: KPTK (SE Michigan)
Aircraft: C205
[youtube]https://youtu.be/KGFsAOUdX7A[/youtube]

_________________
Holoholo …


Top

 Post subject: Re: P-51; the H-Model is a Different Plane
PostPosted: 14 Sep 2023, 10:14 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/02/12
Posts: 286
Post Likes: +257
Location: Birmingham, AL
Aircraft: B55 President 2
The Greg's Airplanes videos are always a well researched treat to watch


Top

 Post subject: Re: P-51; the H-Model is a Different Plane
PostPosted: 14 Sep 2023, 10:49 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/17/08
Posts: 6506
Post Likes: +14332
Location: KMCW
Aircraft: B55 PII,F-1,L-2,OTW,
The -H is an entirely different airplane. Different fuselage, different wing planform, different airfoil, and a different tail. It is like the difference between a Legacy Hornet and a Super Hornet. In that case, my understanding it, it was done so that they would not have to go through a selection process.

_________________
Tailwinds,
Doug Rozendaal
MCW
Be Nice, Kind, I don't care, be something, just don't be a jerk ;-)


Top

 Post subject: Re: P-51; the H-Model is a Different Plane
PostPosted: 14 Sep 2023, 15:07 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/06/11
Posts: 9208
Post Likes: +4842
Aircraft: Warbirds
Amazingly the P-51 goes back to 1940 when the British ordered a prototype and it was constructed in about 120 days. Engineering had mostly already been done as NAA had been shopping the design to the US Army Air Corps who showed little interest. The airframe and wing changed little from 1940 through the P-51A (Allison V-1710 w/3 Blade Prop), B/C (Packard builr Rolls Royce V-1650 w/4 blade prop) and D/K (Bubble Canopy and inboard leading edge change as well as 2 more Machine Guns in the wings).
The H came from R&D work going back to 1943. This was a few different prototypes based on lightning the airframe and higher horsepower Merlin variants. P-51J, G and F.
In the late 1943 timeframe the USAAC decided Fighters needed more fuel. For the P-51B/C and D/K a fuselage Cell behind the Pilot was added for an additional 80 Gals. The Lightwweight P-51 Prototypes were all designed without this feature and some additional engineering was needed resulting in the P-51H. Closely related to the P-51J. The Packard Merlin V-1650-9 had Water Alcohol Injection and was rated to 2200 HP. The 1st Merlin's built by RR were barely 1000 HP. Quite a jump in about 8 years of use.

_________________
Be careful what you ask for, your mechanic wants to sleep at night.


Top

 Post subject: Re: P-51; the H-Model is a Different Plane
PostPosted: 14 Sep 2023, 16:31 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/06/11
Posts: 9208
Post Likes: +4842
Aircraft: Warbirds
WWII Chart from Dec 1944 comparing late R-2800 P-47D, P-51H and the new XP-8A Jet. Both P-47D and P-51H equipped with Water Injection. P-51H at 70" MP is less than the 80-90" MP the engine was capable of.
Attachment:
Screen Shot 2023-09-14 at 4.24.20 PM.png


This website offers many WWII Flight Testing Data for many of the Fighters used around the world.
This is the data from USAAF testing of a P-51H to corroborate NAA Data. Links to Scans of original charts at the bottom of the page.
http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/ ... 64182.html


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Be careful what you ask for, your mechanic wants to sleep at night.


Top

 Post subject: Re: P-51; the H-Model is a Different Plane
PostPosted: 14 Sep 2023, 17:33 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/06/11
Posts: 9208
Post Likes: +4842
Aircraft: Warbirds
From NAA Report revised after A/C flew and tested.
At 70"+ of MP the engine is using more than 3 gal of fuel per minute.

Image from Aircorpslibrary.com-
Attachment:
Screen Shot 2023-09-14 at 5.25.43 PM.png


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Be careful what you ask for, your mechanic wants to sleep at night.


Top

 Post subject: Re: P-51; the H-Model is a Different Plane
PostPosted: 14 Sep 2023, 20:30 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/13/19
Posts: 589
Post Likes: +708
Company: USAF and Polaris Program
Location: FL
Aircraft: F-35A A-JET L39 A36
Despite the performance differences, I think the D model (top) was a bit better looking.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: P-51; the H-Model is a Different Plane
PostPosted: 14 Sep 2023, 21:19 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/06/11
Posts: 9208
Post Likes: +4842
Aircraft: Warbirds
Username Protected wrote:
Despite the performance differences, I think the D model (top) was a bit better looking.

Top photo A/C is still airworthy. Was sent to NACA and became NACA 127, one of a fleet of NACA P-51s configured for High Speed Research with shaped alum plates over the gun bays and a tall tail. Airflow over the top of the wing would exceed MACH 1 at .75-.8 Mach. Shapes and test articles would be bolted to the upper wing and dives from high altitudes would be performed. The DG would be rotated 90 degrees and zeroed while level. Dives at 25 degrees nose down could be performed. Camera’s and instrumentation where installed.
2 other NACA P-51s are also flying today.
Attachment:
684D8A34-E016-4AD6-93F9-CA433A2E1E70.jpeg


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Be careful what you ask for, your mechanic wants to sleep at night.


Top

 Post subject: Re: P-51; the H-Model is a Different Plane
PostPosted: 15 Sep 2023, 02:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/22/12
Posts: 2845
Post Likes: +2792
Company: Retired
Location: Lynnwood, WA (KPAE)
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
I talked to the owner of the world's only flying H-model at an airshow this summer. They made lots of non-performance improvements as well. The cowling is different, providing much better engine access, and that line in the way when accessing the spark plugs is gone. They put a lip on the canopy to stop the air leaks, and put in a Janitrol heater to keep the cockpit warm. It's clear the designers talked to many pilots and crew chiefs, not just aerodynamicists.


Top

 Post subject: Re: P-51; the H-Model is a Different Plane
PostPosted: 15 Sep 2023, 07:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/15/17
Posts: 1117
Post Likes: +580
Company: Cessna (retired)
Interesting that the charts show a "combat rating" higher than a "war emergency rating." Never heard of that before.


Top

 Post subject: Re: P-51; the H-Model is a Different Plane
PostPosted: 15 Sep 2023, 07:18 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 07/09/09
Posts: 3672
Post Likes: +1563
Company: Progress Technical. LLC
Location: Doylestown, PA (KDYL)
Aircraft: B-55
Wikipedia says there are about 11 H models left of the 150 airworthy Mustangs in the world.

Great stuff.

Question, could you build a full size Mustang today if you had an *big* budget? Why are there no new replicas made? Maybe the stampings are the hard part?

--paul


Top

 Post subject: Re: P-51; the H-Model is a Different Plane
PostPosted: 15 Sep 2023, 07:55 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/25/10
Posts: 13185
Post Likes: +21095
Company: Summerland Key Airport
Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
Username Protected wrote:
The -H is an entirely different airplane. Different fuselage, different wing planform, different airfoil, and a different tail. It is like the difference between a Legacy Hornet and a Super Hornet. In that case, my understanding it, it was done so that they would not have to go through a selection process.


Navy: We need a stealthy 4+ Gen fighter, but we can't afford it.
McDD/Boeing: Hold my beer.
Without a doubt, the greatest hoodwink the Navy ever pulled on Congress.

_________________
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.
— Heinlein


Top

 Post subject: Re: P-51; the H-Model is a Different Plane
PostPosted: 15 Sep 2023, 08:05 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/06/11
Posts: 9208
Post Likes: +4842
Aircraft: Warbirds
Username Protected wrote:
Wikipedia says there are about 11 H models left of the 150 airworthy Mustangs in the world.

Great stuff.

Question, could you build a full size Mustang today if you had an *big* budget? Why are there no new replicas made? Maybe the stampings are the hard part?

--paul

Some kind of link to an original serial number provides value that a homebuilt lacks.
Several have tried setting up homebuilt type replica redo with no real success.
In 07 2 Mustangs landing after displays at OSH hit at touchdown resulting in the loss of Gerry Beck and his P-51A which was registered as a homebuilt. So 1 has been built and flown.
Big budget will get you a real one. Several outfits around the country can do that for you.
One such is Aircorps Aviation. They took an airframe left abandoned in New Guinea and built it back to new, winning Grand Champion Warbird at OSH. They have done the same with several P-51s.
Attachment:
DF4EC17E-87C5-4C3E-8B64-670054D82739.png

Attachment:
AAAFB703-7596-4E0A-87CD-8CC4E92E23CD.png


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Be careful what you ask for, your mechanic wants to sleep at night.


Top

 Post subject: Re: P-51; the H-Model is a Different Plane
PostPosted: 15 Sep 2023, 08:11 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/06/11
Posts: 9208
Post Likes: +4842
Aircraft: Warbirds
Username Protected wrote:
Interesting that the charts show a "combat rating" higher than a "war emergency rating." Never heard of that before.

Difference is the water injection.
You could run 67” MP WEP dry, no ADI, which other Mustang models did as well with the high octane fuel.
With ADI you could run 90” MP, combat power.

_________________
Be careful what you ask for, your mechanic wants to sleep at night.


Top

 Post subject: Re: P-51; the H-Model is a Different Plane
PostPosted: 15 Sep 2023, 13:37 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/08/12
Posts: 1238
Post Likes: +1628
Location: Ukiah, California
Username Protected wrote:
I talked to the owner of the world's only flying H-model at an airshow this summer. They made lots of non-performance improvements as well. The cowling is different, providing much better engine access, and that line in the way when accessing the spark plugs is gone. They put a lip on the canopy to stop the air leaks, and put in a Janitrol heater to keep the cockpit warm. It's clear the designers talked to many pilots and crew chiefs, not just aerodynamicists.

Mike Coutches son or grandson I presume?

Dan


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.camguard.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.