20 Jun 2025, 02:12 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 26 May 2025, 13:55 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8056 Post Likes: +10384 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
My buddy Mike likes to turn every thread into a Citation V thread, I suggested he start this thread, but he’s more of a follower than a leader… so here it goes.
(standby for criticism of how many threads I start)
There are two aircraft that have very similar passenger and range capabilities, the Citation V and the King Air 350, I actually prefer the V over the 350, I think it is more airplane for the money, assuming it fits your mission and you’re ok with the slightly higher operating cost, but to defer to Mike C., I’ll take the weaker position in this debate and defend the King Air.
_________________ Winners don’t whine.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 26 May 2025, 16:16 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/12/10 Posts: 560 Post Likes: +1025 Location: Dallas, Texas
Aircraft: Piaggio P180, T-6
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My buddy Mike likes to turn every thread into a Citation V thread, I suggested he start this thread, but he’s more of a follower than a leader… so here it goes.
(standby for criticism of how many threads I start)
There are two aircraft that have very similar passenger and range capabilities, the Citation V and the King Air 350, I actually prefer the V over the 350, I think it is more airplane for the money, assuming it fits your mission and you’re ok with the slightly higher operating cost, but to defer to Mike C., I’ll take the weaker position in this debate and defend the King Air. LOL the Piaggio beats both in comfort, economy, quietness and looks (just sayin') Carry on!  Attachment: IMG_6544.jpeg
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 26 May 2025, 16:36 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/10/17 Posts: 2211 Post Likes: +1588 Company: Skyhaven Airport Inc
Aircraft: various mid century
|
|
It was said before but Owner buys a Bonanza, then Baron, then Kingair. Flies in and out of the local airport for years.
There goes Bob in his Airplane. All smiles.
Then buys a Citation. There goes Bob in his PRIVATE JET! Must be nice. guess he is into something... Scowls. Grumbling. Employees want more pay,
Bob has to deal with this. It's a real issue that in small communities can be a deal breaker.
The Private Jet negative stigma is real. Oddly it follows Pilatus also. every time a PC-12 lands here I get calls or people stop me on the street. "who had the private jet the other day?". I fly the Kingair in and out several times a week and nobody says a word.
Piaggio might be quiet inside but sadly not when it flies over. DB meter might say one thing but you know when one goes over.
Last edited on 26 May 2025, 16:38, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 26 May 2025, 16:37 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 5755 Post Likes: +7146 Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My buddy Mike likes to turn every thread into a Citation V thread, I suggested he start this thread, but he’s more of a follower than a leader… so here it goes.
(standby for criticism of how many threads I start)
There are two aircraft that have very similar passenger and range capabilities, the Citation V and the King Air 350, I actually prefer the V over the 350, I think it is more airplane for the money, assuming it fits your mission and you’re ok with the slightly higher operating cost, but to defer to Mike C., I’ll take the weaker position in this debate and defend the King Air. LOL the Piaggio beats both in comfort, economy, quietness and looks (just sayin') Carry on!  Attachment: IMG_6544.jpeg I left out of a 3,480' runway in Florida (KLNA) on Saturday with 4 adults and 2 kids, and 300lbs of bags in a Citation. We came nonstop to KMWL (1,030miles) in 3:00 hours. Will your plane do that?
_________________ I'm just here for the free snacks
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 26 May 2025, 17:16 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7384 Post Likes: +4856 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I left out of a 3,480' runway in Florida (KLNA) on Saturday with 4 adults and 2 kids, and 300lbs of bags in a Citation. We came nonstop to KMWL (1,030miles) in 3:00 hours. Will your plane do that? Yes, comfortably. Route KLNA-HEVVN-KMWL. Total wt of pax estimated at 1000 lbs (since you separated the cargo and two are kids) 300 lbs cargo Right now at FL360 (28 kts headwind), 3+23 on 2053 lbs fuel with 642 lb reserve. 642 lbs reserve is about 1.2 hr at cruise. I could fly FL380, take a couple more minutes and burn a tad less if I want a hair more fuel or payload margin. What model Citation? What was the trip fuel burn? Could your pax stand up in the aisle? 
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 26 May 2025, 17:41 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 5755 Post Likes: +7146 Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I left out of a 3,480' runway in Florida (KLNA) on Saturday with 4 adults and 2 kids, and 300lbs of bags in a Citation. We came nonstop to KMWL (1,030miles) in 3:00 hours. Will your plane do that? Yes, comfortably. Route KLNA-HEVVN-KMWL. Total wt of pax estimated at 1000 lbs (since you separated the cargo and two are kids) 300 lbs cargo Right now at FL360 (28 kts headwind), 3+23 on 2053 lbs fuel with 642 lb reserve. 642 lbs reserve is about 1.2 hr at cruise. I could fly FL380, take a couple more minutes and burn a tad less if I want a hair more fuel or payload margin. What model Citation? What was the trip fuel burn? Could your pax stand up in the aisle?  Impressive. I didn't know if the runway length would have been an issue. My fuel burn was almost twice that at 4,000 lbs. edit: forgot your other two questions. It was an Ultra, and the kids could stand up....
_________________ I'm just here for the free snacks
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 26 May 2025, 18:33 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20355 Post Likes: +25527 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Current score: 1467 to 251 Biased score keeper. You counted all the variations of the 350 and only one variation of the 560. You should count all the variations of the 560, too. V, Ultra, Encore, Encore+. They differ in exactly the ways the 350s do, avionics and engines. There are still more 350s, but it is a lot closer. Of course, 44,000 172s were built, so if we judge by quantity built, that's the best airplane of all time. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 26 May 2025, 18:38 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/12/08 Posts: 966 Post Likes: +283 Location: Liberty, MO
Aircraft: Bonanza P35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Current score: 1467 to 251 Biased score keeper. You counted all the variations of the 350 and only one variation of the 560. You should count all the variations of the 560, too. V, Ultra, Encore, Encore+. They differ in exactly the ways the 350s do, avionics and engines. There are still more 350s, but it is a lot closer. Of course, 44,000 172s were built, so if we judge by quantity built, that's the best airplane of all time. Mike C.
Don't forget the 560 XLS versions. Separate type rating (darn it) but still a 560.
John
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 26 May 2025, 18:45 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/15/17 Posts: 1107 Post Likes: +576 Company: Cessna (retired)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Current score: 1467 to 251 Biased score keeper. You counted all the variations of the 350 and only one variation of the 560. You should count all the variations of the 560, too. V, Ultra, Encore, Encore+. They differ in exactly the ways the 350s do, avionics and engines. There are still more 350s, but it is a lot closer. Of course, 44,000 172s were built, so if we judge by quantity built, that's the best airplane of all time. Mike C.
Some think the 172 IS the best airplane of all time.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 26 May 2025, 18:48 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/30/15 Posts: 1787 Post Likes: +1867 Location: Charlotte
Aircraft: Avanti-Citabria
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I left out of a 3,480' runway in Florida (KLNA) on Saturday with 4 adults and 2 kids, and 300lbs of bags in a Citation. We came nonstop to KMWL (1,030miles) in 3:00 hours. Will your plane do that? Yes, MY PIAGGIO near full gross in 30C temps would rotate just under 3,000 feet and complete trip in about 3hr and 20 minutes (Dallas STAR taking 10 more mins) at FL360 burning about 2,000 pounds. I fly into and out of LNA when going to Flight Safety sometimes and would NEVER depart that short a runway that heavy. I would depart West Palm or Stuart. With my customer base NOT having a jet is a plus. 390 knots FL300 yessirreeBOB Having a 5'10" cabin and small wing that laughs at turbulence Challengers are complaining about...another plus X TU 6,000 foot cabin round 39,000 feet- one more plus Last week burning 78 gph while cruising 360 True at FL400 (yes, I was light) and grinning-another plus. reverse thrust- fully acrobatic yep bleed air anti ice makes me laugh every time I see ice on wing- 1 more full stand up lav-plus OH, wait for it.....nothing ever breaks. I am so SO glad most were afraid of this airplane and I got it for 70% discount. 
_________________ I wanna go phastR.....and slowR
Last edited on 26 May 2025, 19:04, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 26 May 2025, 18:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20355 Post Likes: +25527 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yes, comfortably. 3480 ft runway, with an engine failure at rotation? That doesn't feel like it would be "comfortable". My flight planner says 3900 lbs fuel, 2:57, cabin load up to 1800 lbs, at FL400. FL430 is 3700 lbs and 11 minutes slower. Reserve is over an hour. If I slow down to LRC, fuel goes to 3400 lbs, FL430, 3:15 time. So you save ~1300 lbs fuel over my V though I am still a touch faster yet. Quote: Could your pax stand up in the aisle? ;) I and most of my passengers can't stand up in an Avanti. At 5'9", it isn't a true stand up cabin. You do have a much bigger cabin none the less. The Avanti is nice airplane and has some great features. If fuel was $20/gallon, it would be a hot item. I just don't think I can fly one for less than my V given current economics. It would deserve some consideration if moving out of my V. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 26 May 2025, 18:55 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 5755 Post Likes: +7146 Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I left out of a 3,480' runway in Florida (KLNA) on Saturday with 4 adults and 2 kids, and 300lbs of bags in a Citation. We came nonstop to KMWL (1,030miles) in 3:00 hours. Will your plane do that? Yes, MY PIAGGIO near full gross in 30C temps would rotate just under 3,000 feet and complete trip in about 3hr and 20 minutes (Dallas STAR taking 10 more mins) at FL360 burning about 2,000 pounds. I fly into and out of LNA when going to Flight Safety sometimes and would NEVER depart that short a runway that heavy. I would depart West Palm or Stuart. Yea, we were off in about 2,500', but I agree, its just not worth it normally. Actually going into Stuart on Wednesday. That will be my first time there. PBI has gotten ridiculous on their ramp fees, and if Trump is in town its a complete circus.
_________________ I'm just here for the free snacks
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 26 May 2025, 19:01 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/06/19 Posts: 375 Post Likes: +281 Location: Maryville, Tennessee
Aircraft: Bonanza A36
|
|
Quote: PBI has gotten ridiculous on their ramp fees, and if Trump is in town its a complete circus. Does Signature charge an event fee when the POTUS in town? Seems like they do for every other thing going on across the country.
_________________ CL-65, CE-525S, EMB-505, EMB-550
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: A tale of two workhorses Citation V vs King Air 350 Posted: 26 May 2025, 19:04 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20355 Post Likes: +25527 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The Private Jet negative stigma is real. It hasn't been a material issue for me. Some have been impressed, some have been concerned, most don't realty care, so on the whole, basically a wash. I'll say the employees really like traveling in the V. "Hey Mike, I need to go visit <client>, when are you available to fly us there?" I don't think the Salt Lake City day trip I did would be doable in the King Air. We had 80-100 knot headwinds on the way out, which would have been 70 knots in the mid 20s. I'm still doing 310-330 over the ground, the King Air would be 100 knots less give or take. The extra 2 hours in the King Air would have made it an overnight visit. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|