11 Dec 2025, 09:29 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Navajo Negatives Posted: 28 Aug 2017, 22:35 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/01/11 Posts: 6934 Post Likes: +6207 Location: In between the opioid and marijuana epidemics
Aircraft: 182, A36TC
|
|
|
Besides lack of pressurization. Any downsides?
I am specifically asking about straight Navajo, CR, and Chieftain.
_________________ Fly High,
Ryan Holt CFI
"Paranoia and PTSD are requirements not diseases"
Last edited on 28 Aug 2017, 22:59, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Navajo Negatives Posted: 28 Aug 2017, 23:00 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/01/11 Posts: 6934 Post Likes: +6207 Location: In between the opioid and marijuana epidemics
Aircraft: 182, A36TC
|
|
|
Not as much of an aero plane as a Duke!
_________________ Fly High,
Ryan Holt CFI
"Paranoia and PTSD are requirements not diseases"
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Navajo Negatives Posted: 28 Aug 2017, 23:08 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 16948 Post Likes: +28775 Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
|
2 big negatives, in a backhanded sort of way
1. Too much in demand, people want a lot of money for a good one
2. Too much utility so most of them are well-used
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Navajo Negatives Posted: 28 Aug 2017, 23:13 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/01/11 Posts: 6934 Post Likes: +6207 Location: In between the opioid and marijuana epidemics
Aircraft: 182, A36TC
|
|
|
Jeff,
Agreed and agreed. Hence me wants.
_________________ Fly High,
Ryan Holt CFI
"Paranoia and PTSD are requirements not diseases"
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Navajo Negatives Posted: 29 Aug 2017, 01:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/12/11 Posts: 683 Post Likes: +355 Location: Central California
Aircraft: Navajo /7GCBC/TTX
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Jeff,
Agreed and agreed. Hence me wants. I recently bought a "C" model with the Panther conversion and 52 gal. nacile tanks. 242 total gallons when all six are full. It's an amazing airplane so far. Fill the tanks, seats, luggage compartments and go. I never imagined myself owning anything other then a Beechcraft product but I'm extremely happy. I have a 81 model, one owner with 2180 TT and 480 on the conversion. I was very lucky to be in the right place at the right time. Feel free to contact me and I'm happy to discuss Rick
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Navajo Negatives Posted: 29 Aug 2017, 02:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/17/14 Posts: 6045 Post Likes: +2769 Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
|
|
|
The flap computer is $14k and the older "computers" can't be overhauled. Apparently some part in there is made of unobtanium. I still want to tear one apart to see what is in it. ...still can't understand why the old one can't be overhauled.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Navajo Negatives Posted: 29 Aug 2017, 21:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/04/11 Posts: 1709 Post Likes: +244 Company: W. John Gadd, Esq. Location: Florida
Aircraft: C55 Baron
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 2 big negatives, in a backhanded sort of way
1. Too much in demand, people want a lot of money for a good one
2. Too much utility so most of them are well-used Bingo. They bring strong money.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Navajo Negatives Posted: 29 Aug 2017, 21:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/01/11 Posts: 6934 Post Likes: +6207 Location: In between the opioid and marijuana epidemics
Aircraft: 182, A36TC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The flap computer is $14k and the older "computers" can't be overhauled. Apparently some part in there is made of unobtanium. I still want to tear one apart to see what is in it. ...still can't understand why the old one can't be overhauled. Funny how these specialty items just kill your desire to own one. Nothing else quite like one. Hence the dilemna
_________________ Fly High,
Ryan Holt CFI
"Paranoia and PTSD are requirements not diseases"
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Navajo Negatives Posted: 29 Aug 2017, 21:32 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/09/13 Posts: 929 Post Likes: +472 Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: They bring strong money.
Yep and make strong money. I've got one which is on permanent charter with a company and it blows me away the money they can make. That's why as above they hold value.
Andrew
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Navajo Negatives Posted: 30 Aug 2017, 17:34 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/29/12 Posts: 674 Post Likes: +263
|
|
|
The navajo is a super airplane. Very confortable in the cabin and the cockpit. More room to move in the cockpit than a KA. Large cargo areas, so you can overstuff them, specially with the wing lockers. So you have to manage how much weight you put on them. My only issue with them, is that I always felt that losing and engine would have been really really bad news. Hopefully never did.
Rgs,
Patrick.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|