30 Nov 2025, 02:30 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: L39 Posted: 03 Jan 2017, 13:02 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/23/08 Posts: 7357 Post Likes: +4090 Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx. Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Kevin Walker is your guy. (He is a BTer) Duke L39 And then some...
_________________ Tom Johnson-Az/Wy AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com C: 602-628-2701
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: L39 Posted: 05 Jan 2017, 02:26 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/03/15 Posts: 121 Post Likes: +137
Aircraft: King Air
|
|
If you have an interest in jet warbirds, you should consider joining CJAA. If you are considering owning and flying them, it's a huge resource you really need. $80 a year. https://classicjets.org/?q=join
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: L39 Posted: 05 Jan 2017, 21:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/04/11 Posts: 1709 Post Likes: +244 Company: W. John Gadd, Esq. Location: Florida
Aircraft: C55 Baron
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If you have an interest in jet warbirds, you should consider joining CJAA. If you are considering owning and flying them, it's a huge resource you really need. $80 a year. https://classicjets.org/?q=joinGreat input here on this topic. They seem quite popular as far as jet warbirds go.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: L39 Posted: 04 Aug 2017, 13:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/03/15 Posts: 121 Post Likes: +137
Aircraft: King Air
|
|
|
I'm now an L-39 instructor, and recently received my Statement of Aerobatic Competency in the L-39. I am happy to answer any questions that I can on the aircraft. Feel free to post here or drop me a p.m.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: L39 Posted: 04 Aug 2017, 18:56 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/21/13 Posts: 467 Post Likes: +472 Company: Horizon Aviation
Aircraft: Pitts M12, T-6, D17S
|
|
|
731 upgrade is about $225k for,an engine with 1000 hours until major inspection.
Zeke
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: L39 Posted: 04 Aug 2017, 18:58 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/02/15 Posts: 1010 Post Likes: +741 Location: Austin, Texas and Argentina
Aircraft: L-39 Albatros
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 731 upgrade is about $225k for,an engine with 1000 hours until major inspection.
Does that include taking an existing AI-25 TL as a core?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: L39 Posted: 04 Aug 2017, 20:33 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/21/13 Posts: 467 Post Likes: +472 Company: Horizon Aviation
Aircraft: Pitts M12, T-6, D17S
|
|
|
Dunno. Just starting to shop for a 39 and learn more about options.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: L39 Posted: 05 Aug 2017, 02:00 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/03/15 Posts: 121 Post Likes: +137
Aircraft: King Air
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Do you know the ballpark cost of the TFE731 upgrade? Chris, Code 1 has a ready-to-fly conversion for $450,000. I have not seen it in person, but it does look very nice in the pictures. I'm looking forward to actually flying one at some point. I'm sure the performance will be better, but I'm very interested to see how much the low RPM spool time has changed. Although the TFE371-3 conversions get rid of the RAT, I really don't understand why most owners keep the RAT with the Ivchenko engine, since all the jets I've flown have modern American batteries.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: L39 Posted: 06 Aug 2017, 14:48 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/23/08 Posts: 7357 Post Likes: +4090 Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx. Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Do you know the ballpark cost of the TFE731 upgrade? Chris, Code 1 has a ready-to-fly conversion for $450,000. I have not seen it in person, but it does look very nice in the pictures. I'm looking forward to actually flying one at some point. I'm sure the performance will be better, but I'm very interested to see how much the low RPM spool time has changed. Although the TFE371-3 conversions get rid of the RAT, I really don't understand why most owners keep the RAT with the Ivchenko engine, since all the jets I've flown have modern American batteries. Isn't that for engine start? With the standard l39 motor?
_________________ Tom Johnson-Az/Wy AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com C: 602-628-2701
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|