21 Nov 2025, 13:35 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 17:09 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/06/11 Posts: 2930 Post Likes: +1675 Location: Missouri
Aircraft: C-120 RV8
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Somebody help explain what if means to Jason. I think he went to school with bill Clinton. From Van's website: http://www.vansaircraft.com"By the end of 2012, about 8000 RV kits have been completed and flown, and thousands more are under construction. Completion rates currently average about 1.5 per day. RVs are flying in at least 45 different countries and kits have shipped to about sixty. From a small farm in Oregon, these wonderful airplanes have achieved a global following. Not because of any superior marketing campaign, but simply because they fly so well and bring so much pleasure to their builders." Robert
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 17:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/13/10 Posts: 20359 Post Likes: +25466 Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Somebody help explain what if means to Jason. I think he went to school with bill Clinton. From Van's website: http://www.vansaircraft.com"By the end of 2012, about 8000 RV kits have been completed and flown, and thousands more are under construction. Completion rates currently average about 1.5 per day. RVs are flying in at least 45 different countries and kits have shipped to about sixty. From a small farm in Oregon, these wonderful airplanes have achieved a global following. Not because of any superior marketing campaign, but simply because they fly so well and bring so much pleasure to their builders." Robert And I heard recently that the number completed and flown was up to 8800.
_________________ Arlen Get your motor runnin' Head out on the highway - Mars Bonfire
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 18:22 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/24/13 Posts: 804 Post Likes: +562 Company: Retired Location: Farmersville, TX
Aircraft: 2007 RANS S-6ES
|
|
One of the big draws for me is the ability to add air conditioning to an experimental amateur built airplane. There is an all-electric unit that is used on some S-LSAs (with factory approval) that I think would be perfect for experimental builders. About the same weight as an LSA full-plane parachute (~35 lbs, IIRC). Can't add an A/C unit added to my Commander (no STC'ed units available), but could be added to pretty much any experimental. With an A/C unit onboard, the Commander would be the perfect airplane for me... Texas summers can be a real pain! (Yeah, I know about B-Kool and Artic Air, and I'll probably wind up with one pretty soon, but that is a distinct "second best" to a "real" A/C unit. Finding / hauling ice is not as simple when you live way out in the country...)
_________________ Jim Parker 2007 Rans S-6ES
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 18:53 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/13/10 Posts: 20359 Post Likes: +25466 Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 1.5 per day = 500-600 per year Actually, it's 547.5... 
_________________ Arlen Get your motor runnin' Head out on the highway - Mars Bonfire
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 19:48 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/08 Posts: 12160 Post Likes: +3545
Aircraft: C55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 1.5 per day = 500-600 per year Actually, it's 547.5... 
Not on a leap year.
_________________ The kid gets it all. Just plant us in the damn garden, next to the stupid lion.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 20:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/04/12 Posts: 472 Post Likes: +157 Location: KSBP, CA
Aircraft: V35B
|
|
|
The answer I come up with is "Yes".
1. Based on my observation of experimentals flying, and being built. 2. The enthusiasm that their owners have. The EAA clubs Attendance (they invite all the pilots at the airport). 3. The lower cost of a Panel, at what ever level you choose, VFR or IFR. 4. Trade off of speed to GPH, in many cases. 5. RV's sold and built numbers are hard to argue against.
I see RVs everywhere I fly. I have landed at 60 different airports in the last 12 months. 3 Class B, 4 Class C, 33 Class D, and the remainder (20) Non-Towered. Glass air, Lanceair, Epic and many others I cannot name.
In my hangar Bay of 6 hangars there are 3 Lance Air 4Ps, 1 Questair Venture, 1 Epic, My Bonanza and 2 Cherokees. In the next two bays are several RVs and the next bay over a couple more.
I love my Bonanza, but if I go bigger, it will be Baron or Epic. If I go smaller it will be Lanceair 4P or RV.
My instructor here in SLO is swamped literally. He has hired two more instructors, and has three rentals flying almost non stop. Gary is working everyday. Young and old, male and female in training. I am glad I learn two years ago while we were still in recession. I could easily get on his schedule back then.
Some posted difficulty with foreign country flying, The only other countries I am concerned with is Canada and Mexico, and neither has been an issue for my buddy Jeff's Epic or Lance air 4P.
If not a "save" it's at least a middle inning "reliever"!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 20:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6652 Post Likes: +5963 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
|
Honestly, if someone would build a pressurised, FIKI twin kitplane with only two seats, that runs on jet fuel and has more than 2000nm range and does at least 220kts, then I'd build it in a heartbeat and get rid of the Aerostar. Rarely do I fly more than myself plus a passenger.
The Wings Derringer was a move in the right direction as a 2 seater twin, but alas, it never took off.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Without love, where would you be now?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 07 Aug 2014, 20:41 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/30/12 Posts: 2388 Post Likes: +364 Company: Aerlogix, Jet Aeronautical Location: Prescott, AZ
Aircraft: B-55, RV-6
|
|
^^^^ Great looking plane, never heard of it. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 08 Aug 2014, 09:12 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/10/11 Posts: 2052 Post Likes: +715 Location: Allen, TX (based T31)
Aircraft: BE35,CE 500/650/750
|
|
Username Protected wrote: One of the big draws for me is the ability to add air conditioning to an experimental amateur built airplane. There is an all-electric unit that is used on some S-LSAs (with factory approval) that I think would be perfect for experimental builders. About the same weight as an LSA full-plane parachute (~35 lbs, IIRC). Can't add an A/C unit added to my Commander (no STC'ed units available), but could be added to pretty much any experimental. With an A/C unit onboard, the Commander would be the perfect airplane for me... Texas summers can be a real pain! (Yeah, I know about B-Kool and Artic Air, and I'll probably wind up with one pretty soon, but that is a distinct "second best" to a "real" A/C unit. Finding / hauling ice is not as simple when you live way out in the country...) Hey Jim - is that your Commander tied down on the N ramp at KTKI? Is your flight instructor a nice lady with initials AS? BTW, I have a B-Kool, and it works well. But I only use it a few times each summer because I rarely remember to get ice - I suppose it just doesn't matter that much unless it's well over 100. At 3,000ft it's only 95 
_________________ Paul Sergeant, ATP/CFI etc, Bonanza pilot.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 08 Aug 2014, 10:16 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/13/11 Posts: 825 Post Likes: +233 Location: South Texas
Aircraft: Nothing now
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The Wings Derringer was a move in the right direction as a 2 seater twin, but alas, it never took off.
I always liked the concept of the Wings Derringer too. It would make a great homebuilt if it was brought back. Kind of like a twin engine RV.
_________________ Thanks
Mark Shilling Pleasanton, TX
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 08 Aug 2014, 23:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/24/13 Posts: 804 Post Likes: +562 Company: Retired Location: Farmersville, TX
Aircraft: 2007 RANS S-6ES
|
|
Username Protected wrote: BTW, I have a B-Kool, and it works well. But I only use it a few times each summer because I rarely remember to get ice - I suppose it just doesn't matter that much unless it's well over 100. At 3,000ft it's only 95  Sadly, I know exactly what you mean... Used to live in Houston. Highs around 95°F, but at night it would cool down to 95°F or so... Last summer I climbed to 7500 feet, and it was still 85°... That's part of the reason I now own a turbo-normalized Commander, and two oxygen bottles! Cooler up at 16,500 or 17,500!
_________________ Jim Parker 2007 Rans S-6ES
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can Experimentals save General Aviation? Posted: 09 Aug 2014, 02:09 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/27/10 Posts: 2155 Post Likes: +533
|
|
|
James it's not polite to brag . . .
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|