05 Feb 2025, 09:00 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Darkaero? Posted: 05 Jan 2022, 20:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/11/10 Posts: 9787 Post Likes: +13493 Company: ? Most always. I like people. Location: KFIN Flagler, FL
Aircraft: 1991 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I sent in my deposit and was told I have position 134.
My wife told me I needed another project now that the Flagstaff house is done... Richard, 134 is a good number. By the time number 134 rolls off the assembly line the kinks should be worked out. I'd much rather be 134 than in the top 10.
_________________ Bible In Poems BibleInPoems.com BNice
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Darkaero? Posted: 06 Jan 2022, 09:12 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/28/21 Posts: 105 Post Likes: +66 Company: Charwood Partners
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Richard, 134 is a good number. By the time number 134 rolls off the assembly line the kinks should be worked out.
I'd much rather be 134 than in the top 10.
That was my thought. It's probably ~36ish months until I see anything at the earliest. It's a project, they're going to be kinks. I'm hoping by then they will support the turbo engine, and maybe have a de-ice solution, just because of overall conditions at Flagstaff. But it's only $1000 for a deposit. If it turns to vaporware, I've lost more money doing dumber stuff...
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Darkaero? Posted: 06 Jan 2022, 11:59 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/05/11 Posts: 387 Post Likes: +172 Location: Atlanta, GA
Aircraft: SR22
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I think you're making my point. If I told SWMBO we were flying to Chicago for a weekend (round it to 650nm for us) but she could only bring one change of clothes, she would tell me to enjoy myself. This is not a "two people plugs bags" plane, this is a "two people and one small bag" plane, and that has fewer potential buyers. It doesn't look like it will hold as much as an RV-7. The picture makes the luggage space look really small. Check out the video and you'll see it is a bit more space. I think it's still a bit small on volume, but plenty by weight, at least for a two seater. Looks like it might be a neat "second" plane for me, but not my only one. I do Angel Flight missions, plus sometimes need four seats for people, dogs (my daughter's) or stuff. A zippy two seater might be night for weekend trips for my wife and I and the occasional $100 Hamburger run.
_________________ Wayne
LinkedIn instagram: waynecease
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Darkaero? Posted: 29 Jun 2022, 20:28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/10/07 Posts: 33976 Post Likes: +12824 Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I think you're making my point. If I told SWMBO we were flying to Chicago for a weekend (round it to 650nm for us) but she could only bring one change of clothes, she would tell me to enjoy myself. This is not a "two people plugs bags" plane, this is a "two people and one small bag" plane, and that has fewer potential buyers. It doesn't look like it will hold as much as an RV-7. Well, then apparently I married better than you. Mine doesn't need to change clothes several time a day to look (and feel) good But I agree, that limits market for the airplane. My wife usually packs a lot lighter than I do although it seems like she always ends up putting some of her stuff in my bag.
_________________ -lance
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Darkaero? Posted: 29 Jun 2022, 21:22 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/17/14 Posts: 5727 Post Likes: +2494 Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
|
|
Bikinis and speedos don’t take up much room with the crocs and flip flops!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Darkaero? Posted: 01 Jul 2022, 07:58 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 02/21/18 Posts: 731 Post Likes: +972
Aircraft: C182R
|
|
The June update just came out; they've successfully run the engine for the first time, and also weighed the prototype to get an idea of actual empty weight. The prototype came in at 780lbs including a number of fixtures specific to the test airframe, and they apparently have a plan to shed the remaining 30lbs to hit the original target of 750lbs.
I'm impressed how close they are to target!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Darkaero? Posted: 01 Jul 2022, 09:38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/10/07 Posts: 33976 Post Likes: +12824 Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The June update just came out; they've successfully run the engine for the first time, and also weighed the prototype to get an idea of actual empty weight. The prototype came in at 780lbs including a number of fixtures specific to the test airframe, and they apparently have a plan to shed the remaining 30lbs to hit the original target of 750lbs.
I'm impressed how close they are to target! That's the difference between design/engineer then build vs build then cobble (ala Peter M).
_________________ -lance
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Darkaero? Posted: 01 Jul 2022, 10:43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/26/13 Posts: 21411 Post Likes: +21624 Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That's the difference between design/engineer then build vs build then cobble (ala Peter M). Awww, I miss Peter. It's like a favorite SitCom ended. You knew it wasn't going to work, but every week it brought another episode of light hearted, overly optimistic, entertainment.
_________________ My last name rhymes with 'geese'.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Darkaero? Posted: 01 Jul 2022, 12:14 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/05/16 Posts: 3161 Post Likes: +2276 Company: Tack Mobile Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That's the difference between design/engineer then build vs build then cobble (ala Peter M). Awww, I miss Peter. It's like a favorite SitCom ended. You knew it wasn't going to work, but every week it brought another episode of light hearted, overly optimistic, entertainment.
I still think there was a missed opportunity for a reality TV show. No fake drama needed! The finale would be him landing in a corn field, with the text at the end saying "Peter is now seeking funding for his next project, the Raptor 2... He continues to believe he will be successful... So far, there has been no progress on this new aircraft... <credits>"
They could interview all of the people Peter refused to listen to, and some other people. I can imagine an interview with the Velocity folks with some zingers "We designed that airplane already, except in our case, we used the laws of physics as a guideline."
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Darkaero? Posted: 01 Jan 2023, 22:05 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/22/22 Posts: 15 Post Likes: +3 Location: KBMQ
Aircraft: C182M
|
|
I’m very excited to see this take off, not necessarily for myself but to see some new blood in the industry using some pretty cool techniques. Them sharing the development is incredibly interesting
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Darkaero? Posted: 02 Jan 2023, 00:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/23/13 Posts: 8927 Post Likes: +6595 Company: Kokotele Guitar Works Location: Albany, NY
Aircraft: C-182RG, C-172, PA28
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I’m very excited to see this take off, not necessarily for myself but to see some new blood in the industry using some pretty cool techniques. I'm excited about the brothers and the impact I think they'll have in the industry, too. I *love* how thoroughly they've developed their engineering process, and think that will make it faster, easier, and cheaper for them to iterate this design and develop future models. It's also a huge deal that they're young, personable, and using social media to their advantage. The homebuilding movement needs to attract more youth, and this is the way to do it.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|