04 Nov 2025, 05:02 [ UTC - 5; DST ] 
	 
	 | 
	 
	
	
	
 
	
   
	
	
	
	
		
			| Username Protected | 
			Message | 
		 
	
			| 
				
				Username Protected
			 | 
			
				
				
				
					 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 09:57   | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
		
			
				
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
			
					
					  
					
			 | 
			 
			
			
				
				
				 
				 | 
			 
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
   
 
  
  
 Joined: 01/30/09 Posts: 6025 Post Likes: +3389 Location: Oklahoma City, OK (KPWA)
 Aircraft: planeless
 | 
 
				 
			 | 
			
				
				
					
					
						Username Protected wrote: In the jet I'm training in, you need about 75% of opposite rudder to compensate for the yaw. 100% would flip you upside down the other way though. Piston twin single engine stuff is child's play compared to jets. Which jet are you training in and where are the engines located?  
					
  
						
					 | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
			| Top  | 
			
 | 
		 
	
	 
	
	
			| 
				
				Username Protected
			 | 
			
				
				
				
					 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 10:34   | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
		
			
				
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
			
					
					  
					
			 | 
			 
			
			
				
				
				 
				 | 
			 
			
   
 
  
  
 Joined: 01/25/15 Posts: 201 Post Likes: +192
 | 
 
				 
			 | 
			
				
				
					
					
						Username Protected wrote: Which jet are you training in and where are the engines located? E175 so underwing engines. Lear 35 was pretty similar. I'd imagine a Citation might be a piece of cake compared to those though.  
					
							
  
							Last edited on 03 Feb 2019, 10:40, edited 1 time in total.
						
  
						
					 | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
			| Top  | 
			
 | 
		 
	
	 
	
	
			| 
				
				Username Protected
			 | 
			
				
				
				
					 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 10:39   | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
		
			
				
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
			
					
					  
					
			 | 
			 
			
			
				
				
				 
				 | 
			 
			
   
 
  
  
 Joined: 03/01/14 Posts: 2298 Post Likes: +2067 Location: 0TX0 Granbury TX
 Aircraft: T-210M Aeronca 7AC
 | 
 
				 
			 | 
			
				
				
					| 
					
						 If you lose one in a Citation you wind your watch... no big deal. Now if you lose one in a Lear, you’ve got a tiger by the tail. I’ve seen the red screen on my high, hot, and heavy day coming out of ABQ in the sim. Lesson learned. 
					
  
						
					 | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
			| Top  | 
			
 | 
		 
	
	 
	
	
	
			| 
				
				Username Protected
			 | 
			
				
				
				
					 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 12:47   | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
		
			
				
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
			
					
					  
					
			 | 
			 
			
			
				
				
				 
				 | 
			 
			
   
   
 
  
  
 Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20727 Post Likes: +26154 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
 Aircraft: C560V
 | 
 
				 
			 | 
			
				
				
					
					
						Username Protected wrote: I’ve never flown a jet, but...  show me the bodies Exactly. The Vmc roll over accident is essentially non existent in the twin jet world. It is, unfortunately, all too present in the propeller world. Mike C.  
					
						 _________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
					
  
						
					 | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
			| Top  | 
			
 | 
		 
	
	 
	
	
			| 
				
				Username Protected
			 | 
			
				
				
				
					 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 13:09   | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
		
			
				
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
			
					
					  
					
			 | 
			 
			
			
				
				
				 
				 | 
			 
			
   
   
 
  
  
 Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20727 Post Likes: +26154 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
 Aircraft: C560V
 | 
 
				 
			 | 
			
				
				
					
					
						Username Protected wrote: It is way, WAY, more violent maneuver than anything in a piston twin. [youtube]https://youtu.be/sdjONqubZso[/youtube] OMG, we are all going to... uh, live! Quote: It is way easier to kill yourself in a jet V1 cut than a twin piston engine failure. The speeds, forces required etc aren't even close. Your statements are demonstrably false. Mike C.  
					
						 _________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
					
  
						
					 | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
			| Top  | 
			
 | 
		 
	
	 
	
	
			| 
				
				Username Protected
			 | 
			
				
				
				
					 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 13:35   | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
		
			
				
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
			
					
					  
					
			 | 
			 
			
			
				
				
				 
				 | 
			 
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
   
   
 
  
  
 Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6652 Post Likes: +5963 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
 Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
 | 
 
				 
			 | 
			
				
				
					
					
						Username Protected wrote: Someday, someone will make a true personal VLJ that isn't crippled.  What a wonderful day that will be.
  Mike C. It's closer than you think. SJ30i.  
					
						 _________________ Without love, where would you be now?
					
  
						
					 | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
			| Top  | 
			
 | 
		 
	
	 
	
	
			| 
				
				Username Protected
			 | 
			
				
				
				
					 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 16:14   | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
		
			
				
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
			
					
					  
					
			 | 
			 
			
			
				
				
				 
				 | 
			 
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
   
   
 
  
  
 Joined: 08/02/09 Posts: 1344 Post Likes: +415 Company: Nantucket Rover Repair Location: Manchester, NH (MHT)
 Aircraft: Cessna N337JJ
 | 
 
				 
			 | 
			
				
				
					
					
						Username Protected wrote: Someday, someone will make a true personal VLJ that isn't crippled.  What a wonderful day that will be.
  Mike C. It's closer than you think. SJ30i. 
  What is the catch with the SJ30? Small cabin? Looks very impressive. 12 psi differential sea level cabin at 41,000ft, ceiling 49000ft, 2100NM range with IFR reserves @ 485 kts.
					
							
  
							Last edited on 03 Feb 2019, 16:38, edited 1 time in total.
						
  
						
					 | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
			| Top  | 
			
 | 
		 
	
	 
	
	
			| 
				
				Username Protected
			 | 
			
				
				
				
					 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 16:29   | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
		
			
				
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
			
					
					  
					
			 | 
			 
			
			
				
				
				 
				 | 
			 
			
   
   
 
  
  
 Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20727 Post Likes: +26154 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
 Aircraft: C560V
 | 
 
				 
			 | 
			
				
				
					
					
						Username Protected wrote: What is the catch with the SJ30? Looks very impressive. Lack of a viable company behind it. Longish runway requirements. Not enough examples flying to know all its faults yet. Is there a simulator for training? $8.3M price tag.  Makes CJ3+, CJ4, PC-24 viable competitors. Mike C.  
					
						 _________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
					
  
						
					 | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
			| Top  | 
			
 | 
		 
	
	 
	
	
			| 
				
				Username Protected
			 | 
			
				
				
				
					 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 18:02   | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
		
			
				
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
			
					
					  
					
			 | 
			 
			
			
				
				
				 
				 | 
			 
			
   
 
  
  
 Joined: 10/28/11 Posts: 1375 Post Likes: +601
 Aircraft: V35A, B300
 | 
 
				 
			 | 
			
				
				
					
					
						Username Protected wrote: Which jet are you training in and where are the engines located? E175 so underwing engines. Lear 35 was pretty similar. I'd imagine a Citation might be a piece of cake compared to those though. 
  Did you leave tradewinds?
					
  
						
					 | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
			| Top  | 
			
 | 
		 
	
	 
	
	
			| 
				
				Username Protected
			 | 
			
				
				
				
					 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 20:27   | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
		
			
				
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
			
					
					  
					
			 | 
			 
			
			
				
				
				 
				 | 
			 
			
   
 
  
  
 Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5299 Post Likes: +5292
 Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
 | 
 
				 
			 | 
			
				
				
					
					
						Username Protected wrote: Because a piston twin demands precise, quick, and correct action to handle an engine out on a plane that can just barely fly if you are perfect.  If you fail, the plane kills you.
  This is not true in a jet.  There's no engine to feather.  There's no large asymmetric thrust to cause a Vmc roll over.  There's more than enough power to fly away on one engine.  A jet does not have the faults of a piston airplane.  That is, in fact, the main point here.  The SF50 is sold on the basis of piston beliefs that do not apply.
  Mike C. Mike, have you ever flown a V1 cut in a jet? It is way, WAY, more violent maneuver than anything in a piston twin. a) the plane will yaw, violently. b) even more so if you give it a reverser deployed failure c) if you want to go crazy, try a compressor stall. d) the asymmetric thrust is HUGE, and it will flip you upside down very quickly if you don't do it correctly. Much faster than a Vmc roll. And because the plane has plenty of rudder authority, you can also flip it upside down the other direction if you just go full piston mode with the rudder and stomp on it. In the jet I'm training in, you need about 75% of opposite rudder to compensate for the yaw. 100% would flip you upside down the other way though. Piston twin single engine stuff is child's play compared to jets. It is way easier to kill yourself in a jet V1 cut than a twin piston engine failure. The speeds, forces required etc aren't even close. 
  This might be the most untrue post I've ever read on Beechtalk.  My cat could handle an engine failure in a Citation.
					
  
						
					 | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
			| Top  | 
			
 | 
		 
	
	 
	
	
			| 
				
				Username Protected
			 | 
			
				
				
				
					 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 21:30   | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
		
			
				
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
			
					
					  
					
			 | 
			 
			
			
				
				
				 
				 | 
			 
			
   
 
  
  
 Joined: 01/11/10 Posts: 3833 Post Likes: +4140 Location: (KADS) Dallas, TX
 | 
 
				 
			 | 
			
				
				
					
					
						Username Protected wrote:  This might be the most untrue post I've ever read on Beechtalk.  My cat could handle an engine failure in a Citation.
 Yeah, but your cat gets nine chances!  
					
  
						
					 | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
			| Top  | 
			
 | 
		 
	
	 
	
	
			| 
				
				Username Protected
			 | 
			
				
				
				
					 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 21:58   | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
		
			
				
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
			
					
					  
					
			 | 
			 
			
			
				
				
				 
				 | 
			 
			
   
 
  
  
 Joined: 01/25/15 Posts: 201 Post Likes: +192
 | 
 
				 
			 | 
			
				
				
					
					
						Username Protected wrote: Did you leave tradewinds? Yup, moving on. I loved my time there and will miss it though.  
					
  
						
					 | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
			| Top  | 
			
 | 
		 
	
	 
	
	
			| 
				
				Username Protected
			 | 
			
				
				
				
					 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 22:00   | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
		
			
				
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
			
					
					  
					
			 | 
			 
			
			
				
				
				 
				 | 
			 
			
   
 
  
  
 Joined: 01/25/15 Posts: 201 Post Likes: +192
 | 
 
				 
			 | 
			
				
				
					
					
						Username Protected wrote:  This might be the most untrue post I've ever read on Beechtalk.  My cat could handle an engine failure in a Citation.
 Sounds like Citation is an easy one. Got to try it one day. In a Lear 35, it's very, very tricky.  
					
  
						
					 | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
			| Top  | 
			
 | 
		 
	
	 
	
	
			| 
				
				Username Protected
			 | 
			
				
				
				
					 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 23:14   | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
		
			
				
			
				
					  | 
				 
			
			
					
					  
					
			 | 
			 
			
			
				
				
				 
				 | 
			 
			
   
 
  
  
 Joined: 10/28/11 Posts: 1375 Post Likes: +601
 Aircraft: V35A, B300
 | 
 
				 
			 | 
			
				
				
					
					
						Username Protected wrote:  This might be the most untrue post I've ever read on Beechtalk.  My cat could handle an engine failure in a Citation.
 Sounds like Citation is an easy one. Got to try it one day. In a Lear 35, it's very, very tricky. 
  How many hours you have in the Lear 35?
					
  
						
					 | 
				 
				 
			 | 
		 
		
			| Top  | 
			
 | 
		 
	
	 
	
	
	
 
	
	
 
	 | 
	You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
  | 
 
 
 
 
	
 
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
  
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a 
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include 
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, 
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
  
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. 
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
  
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
  
 |   
 |  
  
 | 
 |