Mike C.,

Another thing you might start thinking about, since you are intent on being the poster boy of past TBO operations, if the Biffle Citation II had past TBO engines, what kind of criticism would he be facing posthumously right now?

Sometimes it’s better to let people make their own decisions and accept the consequences of those decisions.

TBO Extension thinks they can do it, so you need to figure out where they get it done:

https://atlanticjetpartners.com/tbo-ext ... 35-series/

If there is a past TBO HSI option, then the strategy can be implemented.

Mike C.

TBO Extension thinks they can do it, so you need to figure out where they get it done:

https://atlanticjetpartners.com/tbo-ext ... 35-series/

If there is a past TBO HSI option, then the strategy can be implemented.

Mike C.

That makes no sense at all. Why would Pratt enable a company to take their revenue?

Pratt being behind is just artificial scarcity, something a monopoly can do at will to disempower their customers.

TBO Extension STC never made any sense, costs way too much for what it is. You have to pay for their STC development costs, their profits, and their monitoring gizmos, which is why it cost way more than just an HSI.

An owner operator doing an HSI without the STC does make sense.

Mike C.

That makes no sense at all. Why would Pratt enable a company to take their revenue?

Pratt being behind is just artificial scarcity, something a monopoly can do at will to disempower their customers.

TBO Extension STC never made any sense, costs way too much for what it is. You have to pay for their STC development costs, their profits, and their monitoring gizmos, which is why it cost way more than just an HSI.

An owner operator doing an HSI without the STC does make sense.

Mike C.

You’ll get less reroutes when you go faster.