banner
banner

05 Dec 2025, 00:55 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 205 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 14  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Pilatus PC-24 makes first public appearance at EBACE
PostPosted: 30 May 2016, 11:18 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
Quote:
Btw....easy to get busted for this issue. Feds observe a flight at an oxygen altitude. Ramp check. Single pilot observed. Check the oxygen system. Too full? Bust. Just sayin'.

Widely believed, but not true.

The "Diluter Demand" mask on all jets will supply very little, if any, O2 on normal flights. So, when you put it on and use it UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS, you're breathing almost entirely cabin air.

Lots of violations filed by ignorant inspectors, but probably no enforcement.


Was just going to post what JD said so I will add on here. Read http://daerospace.com/OxygenSystems/OxygenSystemDemandDiluterDemandFlow.php

Very little O2, if any, is used by a diluter mask in a normally pressurized cabin at 6000 to 8000 feet cabin altitude. The mask is on not to provide O2 while the cabin is pressurized but to kick in if pressurization is suddenly lost.

If you want O2 to clear your head in a pressurized cabin you need to put the mask on the 100% O2 setting.

Quote:
They can also check log entires for oxygen refills vs trips taken at altitude in a know SP operation.


O2 bottle pressure varies a lot depending on temperature. Go from hot SDL to cold Michigan and it will look like you didn't use any O2 or made O2 during the flight.

Between O2 bottle pressure changes with OAT changes and leaky O2 masks when on the ground the oxygen refill log proves nothing.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Pilatus PC-24 makes first public appearance at EBACE
PostPosted: 30 May 2016, 11:29 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
Why would a second pilot have a greater chance then the first?



The very real problem with a quick donning mask is they cannot be quick donned over a headset. It takes some practice to figure out how to quickly throw your headset off, not leave any cables in the way, possibly get your sunglasses out of the way, so you can sweep the quick don mask straps over your head and the mask down around your mouth and nose. Even worse if you are flying with a ball cap on.

Time of useful consciousness is 9 to 15 seconds at FL450 so you don't have lots of time to fumble around getting your mask on. Two folks trying to get onto O2 gives better odds one will succeed within the window.

Image

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Pilatus PC-24 makes first public appearance at EBACE
PostPosted: 30 May 2016, 11:32 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:

I have mine around my neck at FL200 and above and I test the system by breathing through it every time I put it on.


Having your mask around your neck is only a good practice if your mask is NOT the quick donning type.

Quick donning masks are only quick donning if properly left in their holder over the pilots shoulder.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Pilatus PC-24 makes first public appearance at EBACE
PostPosted: 30 May 2016, 11:32 
Online


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20797
Post Likes: +26310
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Review of the SETP accident record almost invariably demonstrates a fully functioning plane that the less than fully functioning pilot accompanied to the scene of the accident. I am sure this pilot of a CJ1 thought he was safer in his CJ1... but he wasn't.

Early indications are he did not have a fully functioning airplane. Some sort of instrument problem. This accident suggests an inflight breakup from disorientation.

This accident is notable for its rarity. It just doesn't happen very often that a jet, even flown SP, crashes. Is that because it is a jet, or because jet pilots are trained to high standards every year, we don't know, but it works.

Quote:
I would have safely gotten him and his beautiful wife to Phoenix that day, if they would be willing to slum it in my lowly SETP.

I'm sure that jet pilot would say he could have safely transported anyone who died in a Meridian crash, too.

Quote:
The record of single pilot jets is 5X worse than the record of 2 crew similar sized jets. Can't remember where that study came from.

Please find it, I am curious as to the source of those numbers.

The GA jet safety record is about 10 times better than turboprops. So if we take those numbers in combination, an SP pilot is at least half the risk in a jet versus turboprop.

Quote:
Most SETP or even METP accidents occur with pilots that are purposefully or non-purposely doing stupid stuff.

G4 off runway in Bedford, Hawker into Akron, show us that two pilots can be as stupid in a jet.

Quote:
I would make the case that if SETP's are flown by ATP skilled pilots, in a pro-minded fashion, the accident rate would simply be statistical noise.

I am quite certain this is not the case. Once you eliminate the "stupid" stuff, then the intrinsic safety of two jet engines versus one turboprop engine will make the jet the clear winner.

When is the last time you heard of a business jet crashing due to an engine that failed for some other reason than pilot stupidity?

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Last edited on 30 May 2016, 11:43, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Pilatus PC-24 makes first public appearance at EBACE
PostPosted: 30 May 2016, 11:37 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4438
Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
Hawker Akron, assuming your referring to the two guys who hit the apartment building on the way from Florida.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Pilatus PC-24 makes first public appearance at EBACE
PostPosted: 30 May 2016, 11:40 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6654
Post Likes: +5963
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
Username Protected wrote:
The GA jet safety record is about 10 times better than turboprops. So if we take those numbers in combination, an SP pilot is at least half the risk in a jet versus turboprop.


Yeah, but are you not comparing 2 crew to SP with those numbers? I doubt SP jet has 10x better statistics than SP turboprop.

_________________
Without love, where would you be now?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Pilatus PC-24 makes first public appearance at EBACE
PostPosted: 30 May 2016, 11:41 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
I will be interested to see what happened to the 50 something year old pilot that went Nordo in an Eclipse in S. Africa, then spiraled down after running out of fuel with fatal consequences. Might not have been decompression, not much left of the plane, and probably less left of the pilot, so we may never know. Decompress above 360, and with all the bells, bongs, mist, and Whiskey Tango Uniform, I would say probably a crap shoot as to whether a SP gets the mask on. TUC tables were generated using young airmen healthy enough to pass a multiday flight physical, and IMHO grossly overestimate how well most of us more mature GA pilots would handle rapid decompression.


You will not get a rapid cabin decompression due to all engines failing. The cabin should leak down at 1000 - 2000 fpm depending on how tight the cabin is. Pressurized aircraft are required to have periodic cabin leak checks.

Everyone flying a pressurized airplane should periodically do a cabin leak check. Go to altitude, put on your mask, and turn off all bleed air sources. Observe at what rate your cabin will descend. That is the maximum cabin descent you can expect if you don't have a structural failure.

If the cabin leak check shows a high descent rate then bring the plane into a shop that can pressurize it on the ground. The areas leaking can be identified in an hour or two. Problem areas are seals around control cables, window and door seals, and where avionics cables have been run to pass into the pressure vessel.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Pilatus PC-24 makes first public appearance at EBACE
PostPosted: 30 May 2016, 11:42 
Online


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20797
Post Likes: +26310
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Two folks trying to get onto O2 gives better odds one will succeed within the window.

Granted, but each pilot suffers the same odds at the same time. At best, you double your odds, and that's only at low odds.

If the pilot odds are 50% to get the mask on, then your overall odds of having 1 pilot with a mask on is 75% for two, or 50% for 1.

If the odds are 5%, then the odds at 10% that 1 pilot gets a mask on, so 90% chance you failed overall, versus 95% for 1 pilot.

So two pilots don't change the odds as much as one would want.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Pilatus PC-24 makes first public appearance at EBACE
PostPosted: 30 May 2016, 11:45 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4438
Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
Make the copilot wear it. :D 100% odds.


Last edited on 30 May 2016, 11:45, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Pilatus PC-24 makes first public appearance at EBACE
PostPosted: 30 May 2016, 11:45 
Online


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20797
Post Likes: +26310
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Hawker Akron

Thanks, fixed.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Pilatus PC-24 makes first public appearance at EBACE
PostPosted: 30 May 2016, 11:46 
Online


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20797
Post Likes: +26310
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I doubt SP jet has 10x better statistics than SP turboprop.

I tend to agree, but would like to see a reasonably solid analysis of that.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Pilatus PC-24 makes first public appearance at EBACE
PostPosted: 30 May 2016, 11:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/15/10
Posts: 595
Post Likes: +301
Location: Burlington VT KBTV
Aircraft: C441 N441WD
I have the quick donning kit in our 441 per the RVSM STC. I keep it on the left armrest out of the holder behind my shoulder and take some puffs throughout long high alt flights.
I use a pulse oxymeter to crosscheck the airplane cabin altitude system with my own body as well as my iPhone 6/Foreflight cabin alt alerter as a back up.
If you have a pulse oxymeter, pass it around the cabin on your next high alt flight and see how varied everyone's 02 saturation is. It doesn't follow common logic either: the fitter the better etc.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Pilatus PC-24 makes first public appearance at EBACE
PostPosted: 30 May 2016, 11:48 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:

So two pilots don't change the odds as much as one would want.



Glad the FAA does not follow your logic or we would have 10 pilots in the cockpit to give a 90% success rate.

That is why instead of so many folks in the cockpit the FAA just says mask must be on above FL350 for PT91 and above FL250 for PT 135 when SP. That makes the odds 100% above those altitude that the pilot will be on O2 if needed.

And TUC at FL350 is 30 to 60 seconds and FL250 is 3 to 5 minutes. Hopefully enough time for a fumble fingered pilot wearing a ball cap and headset and sunglasses to get his O2 mask on.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Pilatus PC-24 makes first public appearance at EBACE
PostPosted: 30 May 2016, 11:52 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/13
Posts: 14577
Post Likes: +12366
Company: Easy Ice, LLC
Location: Marquette, Michigan; Scottsdale, AZ, Telluride
Aircraft: C510,C185,C310,R66
Username Protected wrote:
Quote:
Btw....easy to get busted for this issue. Feds observe a flight at an oxygen altitude. Ramp check. Single pilot observed. Check the oxygen system. Too full? Bust. Just sayin'.

Widely believed, but not true.

The "Diluter Demand" mask on all jets will supply very little, if any, O2 on normal flights. So, when you put it on and use it UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS, you're breathing almost entirely cabin air.

Lots of violations filed by ignorant inspectors, but probably no enforcement.


Mea culpa. I was thinking of the oxygen system in the 310 which doesn't have a diluter mask. I am always refilling that for obvious reasons. Thanks for the correction.

_________________
Mark Hangen
Deputy Minister of Ice (aka FlyingIceperson)
Power of the Turbine
"Jet Elite"


Top

 Post subject: Re: Pilatus PC-24 makes first public appearance at EBACE
PostPosted: 30 May 2016, 11:53 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
I have the quick donning kit in our 441 per the RVSM STC. I keep it on the left armrest out of the holder behind my shoulder ....


I suggest you look at the wording of the STC for your mask. It should require the mask be in the holder for flight. You can pull it out of the holder, take some breaths and replace it in the holder.

If you did get a rapid decompression there is a good chance the mask unsecured on the arm rest would be blown off and you may have a cabin mist making it difficult to locate. The idea of the holder over your shoulder is the mask is secured in a known position that you can reach for when blind and disoriented.

_________________
Allen


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 205 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 14  Next



Gallagher Aviation, LLC (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.sarasota.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.avnav.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.