30 Dec 2025, 07:41 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4 Posted: 25 Dec 2025, 21:44 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20980 Post Likes: +26456 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What are real-world PW535 engine program costs right now? Seems like most of the fleet has been on program — fair assumption? I am curious abut this, too. My impression is that most are on an engine program and that it costs about $600/hour for a pair. The TBO is 5000 hours (nominally), so that's $3M for a pair over a TBO period. Quote: Has anyone bought one on program with decent time left, then taken it off program? Comments on this strategy? The engine major work ecosystem is closed. It is Pratt and Standard Aero and I don't think anyone else can do PW500 series major work. SA does what Pratt wants. For example, I don't think you can HSI and fly past TBO like you can with JT15D. Quote: 5000 hr TBO seems appealing and would leave a lot of residual value as the fleet aged out. Could be, a question will be what an HSI costs to get past 2500 hours. Quote: If Garmin ever gets an autopilot STC across the line, does that make an Encore basically a new CJ4 for less than 1/3 the money, or am I missing something? Encore and CJ4 are really quite different aircraft. CJ4 will be single pilot without SPE. Encore has TRs. For example. Quote: Are insurers actually approving in-aircraft training, or still mostly pushing sim-only? Some insurers require sim only, but you can often ask for in aircraft. I alternate between sim and in aircraft. Each provides benefits. My initial insurance wanted sim only, but they have approved all in aircraft training I have asked for. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4 Posted: 25 Dec 2025, 21:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20980 Post Likes: +26456 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Primus sucks Yes, it does. Heavy, unreliable, costly to repair, limited features. The winning hand here is G700TXi panels if/when Garmin gets an AP to go with it. You might drop 400+ pounds. Quote: there is a new pay to play "TBO Extension" now for these things....probably excessively expensive but its new. TBO Extension has been hawking its wares for a while on JT15D. They wanted to sell me their STC. But as a part 91 operator, I don't need an STC to fly past TBO, just do HSI and keep flying. Given the PW535 extension is basically the same thing, another HSI period before OH, a part 91 operator can do the same thing without TBO Extension. The key is finding a way to get an HSI done for a past TBO engine. I was under the impression Pratt (and SA) wouldn't do that, but if they will, then that opens up 7500 hours of usage before OH. That would be nice. TBO Extension will tell you you need their STC to fly past TBO but that is not true per FAA. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4 Posted: 26 Dec 2025, 01:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7819 Post Likes: +5161 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Given the PW535 extension is basically the same thing, another HSI period before OH, a part 91 operator can do the same thing without TBO Extension. The key is finding a way to get an HSI done for a past TBO engine. I was under the impression Pratt (and SA) wouldn't do that, but if they will, then that opens up 7500 hours of usage before OH. Who is the provider of the HSI that is presumably still required by the TBO Extension? Does Pratt and/or SA do it on their behalf in the presence of an STC that they would not do for an operator without an STC?
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4 Posted: 26 Dec 2025, 10:00 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8789 Post Likes: +11367 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
|
While I understand the alure of operating off program, just avoiding dealing with Pratt and Whitney is ample reason, what I do not understand is how an operator can possibly make the math work on an aircraft like an Encore.
The reality is that if you try to operate past TBO, you have three problems, the aircraft’s value plummets, it will be difficult to liquidate at any price and if you have an engine issue, you’ll go from a losing propostion to a financial disaster.
I just can’t see someone who is savvy enough to have $3M+ in cash to buy the airplane (no financing) taking that kind of risk.
It makes a lot more sense to buy a program airplane, fly it a few thousand hours and sell it for what you paid for it. (assuming the market stays the same as it is now)
_________________ I have the right to remain silent, I just seem to lack the ability.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4 Posted: 26 Dec 2025, 17:54 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/23/09 Posts: 1132 Post Likes: +669 Location: KSJT
Aircraft: PC-24 Citabria 7GCBC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Seems like I get a lot of re routes when I fly these days and not loving the idea of adding big changes to the FMS manually. Having CPDLC would really simplify that panel in the Encore + Mike I’ve had CPDLC in the PC-24 for the last two years and practically speaking, I’ve found that controllers only consistently use it for frequency changes and it’s always a “Contact” vs a “Monitor” message which means you are still required to check in on the new frequency. I’ve found controllers will use CPDLC in about 2 out of 10 altitude changes and route changes. However, when controllers do use it, it saves workload and errors. I’m sure frequency of use will only increase. For now, CPDLC is a nice to have but not a game changer.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4 Posted: 26 Dec 2025, 20:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/03/15 Posts: 122 Post Likes: +137
Aircraft: King Air
|
|
Username Protected wrote: https://www.citationjetpilots.com/ Jesse for the win. If you are considering owning a Citation, CJP is the biggest repository of ownership information you will find on the planet. They are very serious about advocating and informing the owner/operators that are in their membership. It's $500 annually. And the tangible benefits for owners are well beyond $500. Not to mention that their "events" are pretty amazing. No other owner/pilot group even comes close when it comes to CJP regional events, gatherings, and the annual convention.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4 Posted: 26 Dec 2025, 22:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/02/12 Posts: 390 Post Likes: +118
|
|
Username Protected wrote: CJP is great. I have been a member for many years. It’s not as busy there as here. I also couldn’t find an Encore thread there. Which maybe I should have create one. Haha.
Just got back from looking at a Encore+. Pretty impressive. Program is $275 a side. Pretty close to what I am paying Williams. Although I don’t think the PW program is as extensive as the Williams.
The Encore feels like a small real jet. Big nice wing, air stairs, single point fueling, TR’s, trailing link gear, etc.. feels heavy duty for sore.
I think it’s pretty good value for what you get.
Mike That’s probably for Silver lite? I thought ESP Gold would be quite a bit more.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation Encore VS CJ4 Posted: 27 Dec 2025, 09:28 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/07/11 Posts: 873 Post Likes: +489 Location: KBED, KCRE
Aircraft: Phenom 100
|
|
|
I'm on ESP Platinum (Which is Gold plus it covers corrosion and inspections) in the Phenom 100 and it is I believe $310 an hour per side for 2026.
Chip-
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|