10 Nov 2025, 07:45 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Beware of Doc's Friends - Operator of the B-29 Doc Posted: 20 Oct 2023, 16:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/11/09 Posts: 1279 Post Likes: +533 Company: Torrence AeroMarine A&P IA Location: Pueblo, Colorado (KPUB)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I’d be curious what the success rate is on disputes. My success rate on disputes where I used my Amex is 100%. They usually immediately credit the account as the dispute is investigated.
Same here, on the several occasions I have disputed charges with Amex I have received my money back immediately and Amex has always sided with me 100%.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Beware of Doc's Friends - Operator of the B-29 Doc Posted: 20 Oct 2023, 20:18 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/12 Posts: 4892 Post Likes: +5570 Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Are you implying I should have accepted the fraudulent tip or not disputed a charge when merchandise I paid for was not delivered as agreed? I’m not implying anything about you. You asked about chargeback success rates, and I said mine was high because I don’t dispute often - even if I think I have been wronged. There have been many times when “merchandise I paid for was not delivered as agreed” and I almost never go to chargebacks as a solution to that problem. We just use different approaches. In this particular case discussed here, I would not have disputed the charge. I understand why the OP chose to dispute, but I’m not surprised the chargeback was declined.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Beware of Doc's Friends - Operator of the B-29 Doc Posted: 20 Oct 2023, 20:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/19/16 Posts: 4440 Post Likes: +8254 Location: 13FA Earle Airpark FL/0A7 Hville NC
Aircraft: E33/152A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Lots of good advice and thank you to all who actually read what I posted and offered your opinion. I didn't do a good job of conveying my tone or conveying what really bothered me. This is not something I'll lose sleep over. I am, and always have been, completely willing to accept responsibility for my actions. I acknowledge I'm taking a risk anytime I hand my credit card to someone. I acknowledge that I paid for something and accepted the risk of losing that amount of money for nothing in return. I believe the vendor and I are each responsible for creating a dispute. I entered a dispute resolution process in good faith and shared the true facts of what happened. If the counterparty shared the true facts in the dispute resolution process, and the credit card company said "It doesn't matter that you weren't made aware of the refund policy and it doesn't matter that you trusted the vendor as to the airshow schedule, all transactions are final unless the vendor agrees otherwise." I would have no problem accepting that. It's the lies and fraud that bother me. If I were willing to lie or commit fraud, I could simply say my card was stolen and likely have the charge reversed, but I would rather lose $1,800 than live with the guilt of knowing I lied and/or commited fraud. I'll go back to lurking and entertaining myself with other peoples' agruments rather than my own. Goodnight everyone, except the people it's not night for.  Maybe, since no goods or services were received, you can recoup your loss by deducting it as a 501c3 donation. Better check with a professional first though.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Beware of Doc's Friends - Operator of the B-29 Doc Posted: 20 Oct 2023, 20:59 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 12/10/07 Posts: 35812 Post Likes: +14256 Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My success rate on disputes where I used my Amex is 100%. They usually immediately credit the account as the dispute is investigated. Same here, on the several occasions I have disputed charges with Amex I have received my money back immediately and Amex has always sided with me 100%. I've heard from more than one vendor that CC dispute resolution is heavily biased to favor the CC user.
To the OP, I think I'd just consider the ticket a charitable donation to be written off.
_________________ -lance
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Beware of Doc's Friends - Operator of the B-29 Doc Posted: 20 Oct 2023, 23:26 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/05/16 Posts: 3151 Post Likes: +2294 Company: Tack Mobile Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Are you implying I should have accepted the fraudulent tip or not disputed a charge when merchandise I paid for was not delivered as agreed? I’m not implying anything about you. You asked about chargeback success rates, and I said mine was high because I don’t dispute often - even if I think I have been wronged. There have been many times when “merchandise I paid for was not delivered as agreed” and I almost never go to chargebacks as a solution to that problem. We just use different approaches. In this particular case discussed here, I would not have disputed the charge. I understand why the OP chose to dispute, but I’m not surprised the chargeback was declined.
I’ve disputed two cases in my life. Is that often?
What would your approach have been if you ordered something online and the merchant didn’t reply to calls and emails? It wasn’t enough money to get on a plane.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Beware of Doc's Friends - Operator of the B-29 Doc Posted: 20 Oct 2023, 23:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/17/14 Posts: 6010 Post Likes: +2745 Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
|
|
I wanted to say pretty much the exact same thing Tate said in his closing paragraph. As others have noted - Beg the Jeffs to kill the thread deader than a doornail. My oldest is now 12 and my knee is bendy-ish and he can fly on FiFi or Doc. We are going to fly on them. The FAA has some attorneys that know little about aviation. They have ASIs and Experts that are bonused and paid to ground aircraft or pilots, as we saw in the Trent Palmer case. Eventually they will find a way to ground these amazing aircraft or make it too difficult on the people that fly and maintain them. One day this privilege will go away and they will be just as loud as the Enola Gay at Udvar Hazy center. My 12 year old, when he was 3, called Udvar Hazy "Quiet Airplanes". He loved going to "Quiet Airplanes" and one day the planes we love will be silenced and we will only be able to see Doc and Fifi in a museum. Tailwinds, Bob Username Protected wrote: I’ve been surprised by the responses on both sides of this thread. I’ve typed out numerous responses only to delete them. I will say this:
I paid for a ride on a B-29. It was a day I WILL NEVER FORGET .Full stop.
If I had to pay double what I paid for the experience, it would be worth it. With only two flying and the possibility of the FAA disallowing rides in the future (I have no insider knowledge on this subject, I just know that the FAA can be the FAA), I recommend you check your pride and make some memories.
Best
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Beware of Doc's Friends - Operator of the B-29 Doc Posted: 22 Oct 2023, 19:05 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/25/16 Posts: 1982 Post Likes: +1589 Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I asked if they had tickets available and the Excutive Driector of Doc's Friends (refeered to hereafter as "ED") stated that they have 5:30pm tickets available for that day. ED issues, huh? Cheer up man. Happens to us all.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Beware of Doc's Friends - Operator of the B-29 Doc Posted: 28 Oct 2023, 13:33 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/13/21 Posts: 42 Post Likes: +32
Aircraft: Arrow
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I’ve disputed a credit card charge twice. In both cases, the merchant lied and the case was closed without any further input from me. I was simply told what they said and that was it.
On one case, a bartender added a 100% tip. I asked what is the point of signing a bill if they don’t need to show the signature. No answer.
In the second case, a merchant never sent an item I ordered. I bought it somewhere else after weeks of trying to reach them. I disputed the charge and got it somewhere else. They then sent it to me (presumably after seeing the dispute despite me telling them I ordered somewhere else and to refund me) and showed the shipping notice to the card company. They don’t accept refunds, so I had two of an item I have zero use for and would be unlikely to be able to resell.
I’d be curious what the success rate is on disputes. Based on my experience, they do basically no research or even apply common logic (a 100% tip?). Neither of these cases, like I imagine most card transactions, are worth the time and money to go chase. I have only once disputed a charge on my Visa, and the refund was done quickly in my favor. As to the subject of this thread, if I were in the shoes of the OP, would have made sure to catch that shuttle bus, and enjoyed the B29 ride. Now a bit off topic, my own story about a customer who demanded a refund. This woman, lets call her Karen, bought 4 new winter tires and wheels from one of my shops. We mounted, balanced, and installed them, and off she went into the snow storm happening at the time. A couple of weeks later Karen tried to dispute the CC charges, complaining about the tires being loud on the highway. Never did she come back to the shop, or so much as call us, but she told the CC company she had, and that we refused to give her back her money. When she lost her CC dispute, she had her brothers and boyfriend go to the shop and threaten my employees, and also say they would burn the shop down. I wasn't there at the time, but heard about it shortly after they left, from my staff. 911 was called, and the plate numbers of both vehicles given, so the police didn't have much trouble tracking them down. They denied even coming to the shop, much less saying anything threatening. Not the smartest guys, since they failed to notice the signs warning of video surveillance, nor seeing the 8 cameras. The moral of the story is this, take responsibility for ones own choices, and educate yourself. Yes winter tires are louder than summer tires are. No you cannot dispute the charges weeks later when you decide the tires aren't what you want. If a plane ride website clearly states no refunds, it means no refund. Blowing off a B29 ride, to watch the end of an airshow is not the choice most people would make in my opinion. We can all make our own choices, but then have to live with that choice, not blame others for it.
_________________ The best things in life are not things.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Beware of Doc's Friends - Operator of the B-29 Doc Posted: 03 Nov 2023, 00:40 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/09/13 Posts: 929 Post Likes: +472 Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I was wondering what the male term for a “Karen” is?
Murray You being too hard on yourself!Andrew
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Beware of Doc's Friends - Operator of the B-29 Doc Posted: 08 Nov 2023, 16:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/14/15 Posts: 227 Post Likes: +182
Aircraft: Piper Cheyenne II
|
|
|
As a merchant who has dealt with a few charge disputes over the years, I would submit that in my case thr card companies (especially AMEX) were heavily pro-customer. We had to generate substantial proof that we fulfilled our side of the transaction in order to be paid. For an experience / service based transaction the legal verbiage on the sales ticket / contract, whatever, has to have specific things in it and the customer usually has to sign it (possibly indirectly through the cc slip)
However it works for a specific transaction type, my experience is that the card companies are no slouches when it comes to keeping merchants in line and are quick to refund cardholders until the dispute is resolved.
If they find in favor of the merchant it is not done lightly.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Beware of Doc's Friends - Operator of the B-29 Doc Posted: 11 Nov 2023, 20:31 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/14/15 Posts: 521 Post Likes: +477 Location: Seattle, WA (S50)
Aircraft: 1969 Baron D55
|
|
|
I just need to clear something up in this thread. The internet has voted, long ago, so like September or whatever, that the masculine version of Karen is:
Chad, Kevin, Ken, Brad, Kyle, Tucker, Donald, OkBoomer, or - yes - Karen. However, it shall be known that these are contextual in nature, and mistakes can be made. The use of Karen is considered gender fluid, and doesn't need to be bound by actual gender.
I researched this on Reddit so I know I'm right.
_________________ @flydrivedevour @auburnmunicipalairport
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Beware of Doc's Friends - Operator of the B-29 Doc Posted: 11 Nov 2023, 21:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/21/11 Posts: 797 Post Likes: +1030 Location: Northside of Atlanta
Aircraft: RV-6 & RV-10
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I just need to clear something up in this thread. The internet has voted, long ago, so like September or whatever, that the masculine version of Karen is:
Chad, Kevin, Ken, Brad, Kyle, Tucker, Donald, OkBoomer, or - yes - Karen. However, it shall be known that these are contextual in nature, and mistakes can be made. The use of Karen is considered gender fluid, and doesn't need to be bound by actual gender.
I researched this on Reddit so I know I'm right. Yeah, because Kyle is clearly the wrong answer.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|