banner
banner

07 Dec 2025, 14:08 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 02 Sep 2017, 20:24 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/09
Posts: 4166
Post Likes: +2990
Company: Craft Air Services, LLC
Location: Hertford, NC
Aircraft: D50A
Username Protected wrote:
Are you referring to jets or all turbines?

There's no way a Meridian costs $1K / hr - more like 1/2 of that.

All turbines.....

I've owned my PC12 since January 2013. There are MX issues that come up that add up. Dumb stuff. A/C freon pump craps out... $10K.

I think it's possible anyone claiming $500 an hour to run a turbine hasn't owned it long enough. No, I do not believe a Meridien costs half what a PC12 costs to run.



This argument has been debunked time and time again. If you want to say "all pressurized turbines capable of hauling more than six people at more than 250 knots for at least 1000 miles" then you might be right, but ALL turbines don't cost $1000 per hour to operate.

For example, nearly all ag planes are less than that, nearly all Allison powered turbines are going to be less than that, most any single engine turbine of less than 750hp will be less than that, and most four place turbine helicopters will be less than that.
_________________
Who is John Galt?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 02 Sep 2017, 20:30 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 3718
Post Likes: +5500
Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
My take on it, if you have a jet mission which is 500-1000 nm between city pairs, then the Eclipse has the edge. If you find most of your travel less than 500 nm the Meridian is more practical. Not sure what part of the country you fly in, but sounds like you fly into a lot of fields and a lot of weather. With that if you fly into hot/high/short fields or contaminated runways, the Meridian is going to be way safer. I landed Bellingham WA one day in some pretty crazy blowing rain. I got a little skid on the Meridian and it started tracking sideways. I went into reverse and it was like putting track spikes on tires. The plane immediately dug in, I was up against the shoulder harness, and was at a crawl in about 800 feet, actually just went from reverse to BETA around 40 knots then normal once I was slow enough that I was not concerned about hydroplaning and getting blown over. Same kind of thing on snow and ice. No need to touch the brakes if the runway is contaminated until you are slow enough that it is safe to do so.

My prediction is that you would be happy with either one, and wonder why you didn't do it sooner. They are both great planes. The Meridian is like a Cirrus on steroids, the Eclipse like a baby Mustang. For business travel, they are both going to serve you well.

_________________
Chuck Ivester
Piper M600
Ogden UT


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 02 Sep 2017, 20:39 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 3718
Post Likes: +5500
Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
There is one other thing that is kind of cool about both of these planes. If you find that you really like the P46T or Eclipse airframe, but find the typical mission creep has you limited. They both offer true 1400+ nm upgrades, the M600 from Piper and the 700 from One. As long as the 700 comes to certification.

_________________
Chuck Ivester
Piper M600
Ogden UT


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 02 Sep 2017, 21:23 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12835
Post Likes: +5276
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
Username Protected wrote:
Just compare it to a PC12..... Both planes have all the exact same equipment on board. Both require yearly training, hangar, insurance, etc. I just don't see how it costs half.


Pc12 bigger = bigger hangar bills
Pc12 more fuel burn, similar speed = bigger fuel bills
Pc12 3-4x hull value = bigger insurance bills

Same reason a 206 costs more than a 172


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 02 Sep 2017, 22:17 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/25/13
Posts: 7605
Post Likes: +3181
Location: Jacksonville, FL (KCRG)
Aircraft: 1991 Baron 58
Do yo visit many runways less than 4000 feet? I believe the Meridian will squeeze into shorter fields.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 03 Sep 2017, 01:03 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7098
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:
I think it's possible anyone claiming $500 an hour to run a turbine hasn't owned it long enough. No, I do not believe a Meridien costs half what a PC12 costs to run.


My number is half that of Crandall's........maybe I'm just lucky but I don't believe so, had my AC replaced, replaced my inertial separator motor.........if you fly more than 300hrs a year the PC12 will run you less than $700 an hr on operating cost. I also fly long legs, visit cheap fuel stops and am a do it yourself owner......

_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Last edited on 03 Sep 2017, 11:57, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 03 Sep 2017, 04:48 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/03/12
Posts: 171
Post Likes: +19
Location: West Chester, Pa KOQN
Aircraft: A36, P46T
I have chosen the meridian as I am based at a 3000ft field, wanted beta, fiki, pressurization, and turbine. Most of my flights are <500nm and I normally fly 4 or less. This fits the meridian perfectly.

As you know, the best way to decide is to do you spread sheet and then fly them.

I was sold on the TBM until I realized that they have scheduled annuals that are occasionally 60amus. I could not pay that and fly the aircraft regularly.

This is as much of a feeling choice as a reason one.

Good luck, whatever you decide, it will be right.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 03 Sep 2017, 08:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13086
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Just compare it to a PC12..... Both planes have all the exact same equipment on board. Both require yearly training, hangar, insurance, etc. I just don't see how it costs half.


Pc12 bigger = bigger hangar bills
Pc12 more fuel burn, similar speed = bigger fuel bills
Pc12 3-4x hull value = bigger insurance bills

Same reason a 206 costs more than a 172

There are a lot more bills than that for both planes. How much fuel does a Meridien burn in cruise? PC12 is about 55 GPH. Is the Meriden at 25?

Did someone seriously try to compare turbine powered AG planes? Ha.

Someone else mentioned lease rates..... where can one lease a Meridien?

The only logical explanation given is Penman. Maybe my PC12 doesn't cost as much as I thought? In that case my argument still holds up..... all turbine powered airplanes that people use to fly around the country cost the same to operate. I do not believe a Meridien costs less.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 03 Sep 2017, 08:29 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/09
Posts: 4166
Post Likes: +2990
Company: Craft Air Services, LLC
Location: Hertford, NC
Aircraft: D50A
Username Protected wrote:
Did someone seriously try to compare turbine powered AG planes? Ha.



Did someone use the qualifier "ALL"? :scratch:

_________________
Who is John Galt?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 03 Sep 2017, 08:49 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/30/15
Posts: 1822
Post Likes: +1909
Location: Charlotte
Aircraft: Avanti-Citabria
Thread drift :hide:

Thanks for the perspective Jason:
Quote: Flying late in the day after working is WORK. Flying early in the morning is fun.

Helped me make a good decision to postpone trip from Charlotte to NY from Friday pm to Sat am. :cheers:

Don,
Me tinks there is an Avidyn Meridian with your name on it soon!

Love my A* so far. We shall see how dispatch reliability goes in the next few years.

A* finest quality so far is speed and burning avgas :D

_________________
I wanna go phastR.....and slowR


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 03 Sep 2017, 10:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/04/10
Posts: 3544
Post Likes: +3251
Aircraft: C55, PC-12
Username Protected wrote:

My number is half that of Crandall's........maybe I'm just lucky but I don't believe so, had my AC replaced, replaced my inertial separator motor.........if you fly more than 300hrs a year the PC12 will run you less than $700 an hr on operating cost. I also fly long legs, visit cheap fuel stops and am a do it yourself owner......


Your hot section was $5000! - nobody else gets those kind of deals. Now I'm too embarrassed to talk about my costs.

The Meridian is a hell of a value and underrated as far as I'm concerned. I'm sure the Eclipse is more money to operate but the much bigger risk is losing support.

_________________
John Lockhart
Phoenix, AZ
Ridgway, CO


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 03 Sep 2017, 10:02 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13086
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Did someone seriously try to compare turbine powered AG planes? Ha.



Did someone use the qualifier "ALL"? :scratch:

Lame

Yeah, go fly your crop duster. You win. lol

Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 03 Sep 2017, 10:12 
Online


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1434
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
Username Protected wrote:
Someone else mentioned lease rates..... where can one lease a Meridien?


http://www.castleair.com/castle-1st-class/

Last time I spoke to them (about a year ago) the rate was $800/hr with pilot.

http://visionairllc.com/services/dry-le ... an-n573ms/

These guys are dry leasing a Meridian, based in Castle Rock, CO. Not sure what the rate is.

I've seen recent rates on online air charter services where Meridians are in the $800-850 / hr range.

If these are leasing for $800 / hr, it's easy to see how actual costs are in the sub $500 / hr range.

_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 03 Sep 2017, 10:21 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/09
Posts: 4166
Post Likes: +2990
Company: Craft Air Services, LLC
Location: Hertford, NC
Aircraft: D50A
Username Protected wrote:
Did someone use the qualifier "ALL"? :scratch:

Lame

Yeah, go fly your crop duster. You win. lol


Well, if its lame, its because it was in response to a lame post. Read the rest of what I wrote...I included all of the Allison powered ships, nearly all four place helicopters, and nearly all of the singles that are powered by something smaller than the -60 series.

So, I think a case can be made that the only ones over $1000 an hour are singles with -60s and up, and twin engine turbines. Even some of the twins are under $1000. Beech's own numbers for the King Airs aren't much over $1000.

Of course, when you throw the keys to a barbie doll receptionist and tell her to call you when its done as the valet brings your Ferrari around to the lobby entrance, even an A-36 would run $1000 bucks an hour.
_________________
Who is John Galt?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Eclipse vs. Meridian
PostPosted: 03 Sep 2017, 10:22 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8730
Post Likes: +9457
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
These arguments about turbine cost are silly. In the first place they ignore the two biggest costs in flying (excepting my final point below) one of these birds: depreciation and capital cost. Secondly, no one has defined what goes into the costs (for example are we including OH or engine programs?). Thirdly, there is no standard for how many hours a year, or miles flown, so it's impossible to make a reasonable comparison.

Lastly, the value of the owner's time is not considered. At the hourly income rate someone must earn to fly any of these planes (or wealth required) the value of that owner's time is substantial. on the one hand the jet is faster (and computed cost must decline). On the other the huge overhead of time for training - while not inconsequential for a turboprop - really has to be considered with a jet. Many want to minimize these (as they want to minimize the other costs) but that is just wishful or ignorant thinking. The time I spent in initial training for a turbo prop dwarfs all other cost considerations in year one and it was an expensive maintenance year. The costs for jet trading would have exceeded the cost of my first airplane.

$500, $750, $1,000 an hour? If you look at the whole picture it's way more than that and $250/hr one way or the other just isn't that big a deal.

Oh, completely forgot taxes which can distort everything further.

Everyone tries to justify what they fly. It's ridiculous. Fly what you want and can write the check for but please don't try to suck the rest of us into your own cost fantasy.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 10  Next



Gallagher Aviation, LLC (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.avnav.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.sarasota.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.