banner
banner

03 Dec 2025, 18:22 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: 1/3 share TBM vs B58 Baron
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2016, 23:39 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1434
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
Username Protected wrote:
Good points Don. I'm pretty adept with ice planning- but of course thus far it's just ice avoidance. I agree with your thoughts about TN FIkI = twin FIKi. Just the former will be much higher initial purchase with lower ongoing expense vs the twin. And no, my A36 is NA


I think the FIKI TKS option on a TN A36 is $$ well spent (yes $60K is a LOT of $$ to spend on a single option). However, I personally wouldn't spend that $$ unless I had a TN or planned to do TN as well. You've just eliminated one of your 'outs' if you cannot effectively climb above icing conditions. You need lots of 'out' options for icing and excess power and the ability to climb is one very good 'out'. Of the (3) options you have (TKS equip your A36, Baron and 1/3 TBM), I wouldn't even consider the existing NA A36 to be a viable option.

If you're really in love with the A36 and wanted to stick with it, a better plan would be to sell yours and wait for a FIKI TKS TN A36 to come on the market. There aren't tons of them but they do show up.

_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Top

 Post subject: Re: 1/3 share TBM vs B58 Baron
PostPosted: 02 Dec 2016, 21:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8870
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
After this weeks trip, 60k seems like a completely appropriate price for FIKI TKS :D

And then there are a couple of minutes where 100k would seem a good price.



On a 5 year timeframe, your most economical solution is going to be to trade up to a plane with FIKI TKS and turbo.


Top

 Post subject: Re: 1/3 share TBM vs B58 Baron
PostPosted: 02 Dec 2016, 23:58 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/22/12
Posts: 573
Post Likes: +380
Our home airport is an authorized Piper dealership. Would it make sense to put our collective 1.2-1.5 mil into a late model Meridian as opposed to a TBM? Maybe not as fast but just an idea to have on field service?


Top

 Post subject: Re: 1/3 share TBM vs B58 Baron
PostPosted: 03 Dec 2016, 08:24 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/20/12
Posts: 104
Post Likes: +107
Location: Doylestown, PA
Aircraft: B55 PII, RV7
Guy, what airport do you fly into when goimg to Buffalo?


Top

 Post subject: Re: 1/3 share TBM vs B58 Baron
PostPosted: 03 Dec 2016, 09:44 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8730
Post Likes: +9457
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
Username Protected wrote:
Our home airport is an authorized Piper dealership. Would it make sense to put our collective 1.2-1.5 mil into a late model Meridian as opposed to a TBM? Maybe not as fast but just an idea to have on field service?


When I was looking a few months ago I analyzed a 1.25 million Piper against a 1.25 million TBM and considered every cost associated with ownership including market deprecation and capital cost on an after tax basis. There was a 10% spread in favor of the Piper. When I did the calculations based on no income tax deductions it was a wash. YMMV. It sounds like you're not buying this plane for business so I don't think you save anything by going to the Piper but you do get a less capable, less comfortable airplane.

Having a plane maintained away from home base is a PITA however.


Top

 Post subject: Re: 1/3 share TBM vs B58 Baron
PostPosted: 03 Dec 2016, 09:57 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/03/11
Posts: 2071
Post Likes: +2175
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
So I drool over MU2s. It all looks great but there is no way I could get insured with 600 hrs and no multi time. As it turns out, TKS can only do incidental ice on my A36 because it's a12V model. I don't want to spend 60k for inadvertent ice protection. I know it's basically similar, but that FIKi distinction is quite valuable flying around the great lakes


I bought an MU2 when I had zero multi time and 1k total time. Insurance was 8k for year one. I got my multi and flew with friends for a few months to get to 100hours multi (MU2 sFAR requirement). I got all my mentor pilot time done in a week while doing the MU2 initial. 200 hours in, the plane is costing me 445 an hour to run. That is the sum of every dollar I have paid this far divided by hours flown. I am not counting engine reserves as I have very long time to go. Nice MU2 can be had for 400k or so. Planes performance is roughly the same as a tbm850.


Top

 Post subject: Re: 1/3 share TBM vs B58 Baron
PostPosted: 03 Dec 2016, 21:54 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/22/12
Posts: 573
Post Likes: +380
Username Protected wrote:
Guy, what airport do you fly into when goimg to Buffalo?


Akron 9G3 if I need an instrument approach
Lancaster 9G0 if I don't
KIAG if I need an alternate


Top

 Post subject: Re: 1/3 share TBM vs B58 Baron
PostPosted: 03 Dec 2016, 23:35 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 3715
Post Likes: +5497
Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
Username Protected wrote:
Our home airport is an authorized Piper dealership. Would it make sense to put our collective 1.2-1.5 mil into a late model Meridian as opposed to a TBM? Maybe not as fast but just an idea to have on field service?


The truth is a TBM or Meridian is really not likely to need much service. Pretty much tires and turbine oil between annuals. I guess it would be nice to have a SC there, but in the 900 hours we have flown the Meridian, there has been only one unscheduled service that I can remember. Not a Piper issue, but a bad ignitor lead on the Pratt. Was field replaced on a Sunday in SC. Still made the flight back to Utah that evening. So still at this time I have ha 100% weather and maintenance dispatch reliability.

_________________
Chuck Ivester
Piper M600
Ogden UT


Top

 Post subject: Re: 1/3 share TBM vs B58 Baron
PostPosted: 18 Jan 2017, 22:58 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/24/12
Posts: 79
Post Likes: +17
Location: Riverside, CA
Aircraft: King Air, A-36,C-340
Username Protected wrote:
Our home airport is an authorized Piper dealership. Would it make sense to put our collective 1.2-1.5 mil into a late model Meridian as opposed to a TBM? Maybe not as fast but just an idea to have on field service?


The truth is a TBM or Meridian is really not likely to need much service. Pretty much tires and turbine oil between annuals. I guess it would be nice to have a SC there, but in the 900 hours we have flown the Meridian, there has been only one unscheduled service that I can remember. Not a Piper issue, but a bad ignitor lead on the Pratt. Was field replaced on a Sunday in SC. Still made the flight back to Utah that evening. So still at this time I have ha 100% weather and maintenance dispatch reliability.

As I'm sure you're aware, a turboprop is big step up and I would have to agree about the 1/3 partnership input I've seen on your thread. I owned a B-58 for several years with all the bells and whistles. It was/is a great airplane. Cheaper to get in and probably cheaper to operate if something goes wrong on the turboprop. For the 250 mile flights, it will be close on the turboprop... I'd go with my own Baron if I were you.

Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5



Gallagher Aviation, LLC (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.Wingman 85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.avnav.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.