09 Jul 2025, 17:56 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Citation 500 Series vs Citation Jet 525 Series Posted: 05 Jul 2018, 01:17 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/09/13 Posts: 928 Post Likes: +471 Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
|
|
Almost back on topic here... Got to fly LH seat in a Textron Demonstrator CJ3+ yesterday from Brisbane to Sydney, so about 400nm. What a machine. From a flying perspective it was pretty standard CJ qualities. Had no issues with the larger airframe. The power was amazing and the FADEC means you dont really do much in the Climb. My wife thought the rear cabin was the same level of quietness as the CJ/CJ2 and she didnt really think there was much of a difference.(which is a darn shame as it would have been good for her to be in love  ) We went to FL400 at MTOW and with in a few minutes of cruise hit MMO so had to pull the power back, sat at 420kts. Total flight time was 90mins and burnt 1500 lbs. Long STAR into SSY so a bit more fuel then expected. The biggest different is the G3000. Really enjoyed flying behind it and obviously having full VNAV capability again reduces work load considerable. A bunch of system (pressuration / Environmental) and all controlled for the touch pads. They definitely do a great job of making the 525 series super simpple single pilot. I think I’ve got the CJ3+ bug...... Andrew.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Citation 500 Series vs Citation Jet 525 Series Posted: 05 Jul 2018, 08:45 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3035 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Suprised the 3+ has chinzy sun visors instead of Rosens for the price.
_________________ Allen
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Citation 500 Series vs Citation Jet 525 Series Posted: 05 Jul 2018, 09:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8693 Post Likes: +9280 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Almost back on topic here... Got to fly LH seat in a Textron Demonstrator CJ3+ yesterday from Brisbane to Sydney, so about 400nm. What a machine. From a flying perspective it was pretty standard CJ qualities. Had no issues with the larger airframe. The power was amazing and the FADEC means you dont really do much in the Climb. My wife thought the rear cabin was the same level of quietness as the CJ/CJ2 and she didnt really think there was much of a difference.(which is a darn shame as it would have been good for her to be in love  ) We went to FL400 at MTOW and with in a few minutes of cruise hit MMO so had to pull the power back, sat at 420kts. Total flight time was 90mins and burnt 1500 lbs. Long STAR into SSY so a bit more fuel then expected. The biggest different is the G3000. Really enjoyed flying behind it and obviously having full VNAV capability again reduces work load considerable. A bunch of system (pressuration / Environmental) and all controlled for the touch pads. They definitely do a great job of making the 525 series super simpple single pilot. I think I’ve got the CJ3+ bug...... Andrew. I got my wife to go look at a friend’s CJ3 a couple of nights ago. New P&I and Fusion panel it looks like a new airplane. Her comments were that she though she had a more comfortable seat in my TBM and, other than the potty didn’t think it was much of an upgrade for her. That didn’t help me either! I agree with you though!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Citation 500 Series vs Citation Jet 525 Series Posted: 05 Jul 2018, 09:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8693 Post Likes: +9280 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I am surprised they let you fly it inverted. With no gyros to break what’s the problem with that? 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Citation 500 Series vs Citation Jet 525 Series Posted: 05 Jul 2018, 15:43 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/09/13 Posts: 928 Post Likes: +471 Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I am surprised they let you fly it inverted. With no gyros to break what’s the problem with that? 
It wasn’t inverted, I’m in Australia so upside down
Andrew
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Citation 500 Series vs Citation Jet 525 Series Posted: 05 Jul 2018, 18:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/25/15 Posts: 201 Post Likes: +192
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It wasn’t inverted, I’m in Australia so upside down Andrew This picture proves flat earthers are wrong!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Citation 500 Series vs Citation Jet 525 Series Posted: 05 Jul 2018, 20:47 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/10/12 Posts: 6697 Post Likes: +8206 Company: Minister of Pith Location: Florida
Aircraft: Piper PA28/140
|
|
Username Protected wrote: With no gyros to break what’s the problem with that?  It wasn’t inverted, I’m in Australia so upside down Andrew Obviously.
[youtube]https://youtu.be/tr71EZ7j6uQ[/youtube]
_________________ "No comment until the time limit is up."
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Citation 500 Series vs Citation Jet 525 Series Posted: 06 Jul 2018, 00:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/01/10 Posts: 3501 Post Likes: +2473 Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I got my wife to go look at a friend’s CJ3 a couple of nights ago. New P&I and Fusion panel it looks like a new airplane. Her comments were that she though she had a more comfortable seat in my TBM and, other than the potty didn’t think it was much of an upgrade for her. That didn’t help me either!
I agree with you though! Try rolling it down the runway, point the nose toward the sky, tuck the wheels in the wells, and then see what she says.
_________________ Previous A36TN owner
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Citation 500 Series vs Citation Jet 525 Series Posted: 06 Jul 2018, 16:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/09/13 Posts: 241 Post Likes: +150 Location: KICT/KFFZ/KLAS
Aircraft: CE25B+/CE25C/DA40
|
|
CJ3+ is an interesting airplane. We operate several and had only 1 occasion where it couldn't climb direct to 450 at gross.
Also beats book speeds by a mile. Will do 435knts TAS at FL300 if you're willing to burn the gas.
Just wish for a glass windshield really.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Citation 500 Series vs Citation Jet 525 Series Posted: 06 Jul 2018, 18:40 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20442 Post Likes: +25715 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Just wish for a glass windshield really. Not if you are paying to replace it. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Citation 500 Series vs Citation Jet 525 Series Posted: 07 Jul 2018, 11:25 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/28/17 Posts: 8451 Post Likes: +10684 Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Just wish for a glass windshield really. Not if you are paying to replace it. Mike C.
Yes, glass windshields can be pricey. The left and right windshields in the 747 are $20,000 per side, or they were 15 years ago anyway. The electrically heated function is probably part of the price with a gold conductor spray between laminates. Then the whole thing with the curves has to be optically distortion free.
I didn't mind the plastic windshields on the Lear, but had to watch out for linemen wanting to clean them with a paper towel and Windex.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Citation 500 Series vs Citation Jet 525 Series Posted: 07 Jul 2018, 11:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13525 Post Likes: +7614 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC, E-55, 195
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yes, glass windshields can be pricey. The left and right windshields in the 747 are $20,000 per side, or they were 15 years ago anyway. The electrically heated function is probably part of the price with a gold conductor spray between laminates. Then the whole thing with the curves has to be optically distortion free.
I didn't mind the plastic windshields on the Lear, but had to watch out for linemen wanting to clean them with a paper towel and Windex. :eek:
My 421C was $50k for pilot and copilot windshields less than 5 years ago.
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My E55 : https://tinyurl.com/4dvxhwxu
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna Citation 500 Series vs Citation Jet 525 Series Posted: 07 Jul 2018, 11:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/28/17 Posts: 8451 Post Likes: +10684 Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yes, glass windshields can be pricey. The left and right windshields in the 747 are $20,000 per side, or they were 15 years ago anyway. The electrically heated function is probably part of the price with a gold conductor spray between laminates. Then the whole thing with the curves has to be optically distortion free. I didn't mind the plastic windshields on the Lear, but had to watch out for linemen wanting to clean them with a paper towel and Windex.  My 421C was $50k for pilot and copilot windshields less than 5 years ago.
Wow! How thick are they, and how are they heated Jesse?
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|