07 Jul 2025, 05:03 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 04 Sep 2021, 14:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7095 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I’ve owned a Baron or my TwinBo for the last 12 years and they cost me about 35k per year to own. I’ve also flown and managed a 2009NG for the last 6 years and seen and approved every expense. A pc12 is 4-5x not counting cost of capital. Be serious would ya.........Baron is 5 times less to operate. Your paint job alone on the Twinbo is my yearly operating for the PC12.. 
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 04 Sep 2021, 14:42 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/09/11 Posts: 1977 Post Likes: +2702 Company: Naples Jet Center Location: KAPF KPIA
Aircraft: EMB500 AC95 AEST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: . . . If I could be convinced all costs (capital, insurance, operating, etc) of a 501 could be comparable to a Meridian over a 5-10 year hold period I'd definitely consider it. The 501 is overkill for my mission, but I'd gladly take the increased capability if it doesn't cost much more. . . . The market is pretty smart. There are many reasons old Citations are almost free and $20k/yr in Mx costs is not one of them. If someone could guarantee me I could run one for twice your Meridian, I’d have one yesterday but:
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 04 Sep 2021, 15:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3459 Post Likes: +4996 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
If you buy an old turbine, there are just some really expensive things that can happen. You may get lucky and just be flying a very expensive plane. You could get a little unlucky and you’re flying a very very very very expensive plane. Not much difference between fish stories and turbine cost stories.  The meridian option for option, year for year is the cheapest factory turbine to acquire and operate. There’s always bigger, higher, faster, but they are all more expensive, apples to apples. There seem to be some good deals, but having a plane where I have to source parts, or refurb parts, Doesn’t sound appealing to me. Some people enjoy that. The last thing about those planes, they are very complex, not really set up for single pilot operations. If you are on your A-game, on an A-day, fine. But if you are having a bad day, in bad weather, and systems start shedding, they are a handful. For most general aviation pilots, being in a simpler plane is just far far safer. Especially single pilot IMC. Which is one of the toughest least forgiving jobs on the planet. Just better off being in a simple single engine turbine.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 04 Sep 2021, 16:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20432 Post Likes: +25696 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If you buy an old turbine, there are just some really expensive things that can happen. This can happen on new turbines, too. And when it does, less choices to resolve it. On an older machine, more choices to resolve it usually such as buy used/surplus parts/engines. Quote: The last thing about those planes, they are very complex, not really set up for single pilot operations. If you are on your A-game, on an A-day, fine. But if you are having a bad day, in bad weather, and systems start shedding, they are a handful. In bad weather, I'll take the Citation over any turboprop. Quote: For most general aviation pilots, being in a simpler plane is just far far safer. Propellers are complex. Having one engine is very complex should it fail. Quote: Just better off being in a simple single engine turbine. Don't agree. A twin jet is all the benefits of a twin (redundant thrust, redundant power, redundant systems) with none of the issues of propeller twins (Vmc roll over, feathering the wrong one) or a propeller single (no redundancy). Plus the high altitude capability means less weather overall. The one place turboprop wins is contaminated runways. My V will stop in 5000 ft with no brakes at all, but a 3000 ft runway with ice or snow will be an issue that the turboprop handles easily. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 04 Sep 2021, 16:38 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/23/10 Posts: 901 Post Likes: +720
|
|
The single pilot citations are very simple to fly. Things happen faster (both horizontally and vertically) but other than an uncommanded TR deployment in a legacy citation there aren't any more gotchas. Managing the airplane in both normal and emergency procedures isn't any more complicated. I guess one could argue syncing the engines is a little more work but that's about it. Really very comparable from a workload standpoint to a SETP. Generally, the more capable the plane the more complex to fly, but that isn't the case with the single pilot citations.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 04 Sep 2021, 16:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/23/10 Posts: 901 Post Likes: +720
|
|
Username Protected wrote: . . . If I could be convinced all costs (capital, insurance, operating, etc) of a 501 could be comparable to a Meridian over a 5-10 year hold period I'd definitely consider it. The 501 is overkill for my mission, but I'd gladly take the increased capability if it doesn't cost much more. . . . The market is pretty smart. There are many reasons old Citations are almost free and $20k/yr in Mx costs is not one of them. If someone could guarantee me I could run one for twice your Meridian, I’d have one yesterday but:
This resonates with me. I have no doubt the market is smarter than me. Like Chuck I have no interest in chasing down parts. I want the thing to work and be fast and hassle free to get repaired when it doesn't. If the catch is you have to be a mini used parts broker or have extended down time, count me out. Maybe down the road when life slows down and the mission warrants the capability.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 04 Sep 2021, 17:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20432 Post Likes: +25696 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I want the thing to work and be fast and hassle free to get repaired when it doesn't. If the catch is you have to be a mini used parts broker or have extended down time, count me out. The Citation allows you many options. For service, wide variety of choices from the mothership at KICT, factory service centers all over the world, to independent shops. My MU2 needed a specialty shop, but I am getting a fair amount of little work done locally, which is great. There are also MSU, mobile service units, which will come to you and fix the plane on site. The whole service ecosystem is geared around keeping the plane flying. For parts, the Textron online parts system is fantastic. I've order a number of things and they are almost always in stock. There are also a large number of well stocked surplus and used parts places. As an owner, you can choose to select your money versus time strategy. If you want to spend the least, you can work the used parts and surplus markets, including eBay, and find a lot of stuff. If you are the "here are the keys, call me when done" guy, then take it to a service center and let them go. Your choice. In my case, I like to do the debugging of issues. So I don't say "the power brakes are not pumping up", instead I say "replace pressure switch S168". But I'm an engineer and I can figure out what part has failed through testes and deduction. Indeed, initially when this problem was reported, the shop replaced a relay. I asked why and they said "it was the cheapest part, so we start there, we move on to the next expensive part if that doesn't work". Uh huh. 5 minutes with a voltmeter and I knew that wasn't the issue. Ask me in a few years how this is all working out, but for now, having a great place to get factory parts quickly, and a local shop that lets me direct the work and provide parts, is wonderful. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 04 Sep 2021, 17:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/27/16 Posts: 899 Post Likes: +580 Location: KAPA - Denver
Aircraft: 1983 Bonanza A36TN
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My 58 cost almost the same per hour as the PC12. The main reason was the fuel cost differential, oil changes, and piston nickel and diming.
Which should make it a fair bit cheaper per nm.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 04 Sep 2021, 17:20 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7095 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My 58 cost almost the same per hour as the PC12. The main reason was the fuel cost differential, oil changes, and piston nickel and diming.
Which should make it a fair bit cheaper per nm.
, just don’t tell Silverthorne.
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 04 Sep 2021, 18:48 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5212 Post Likes: +5233
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: . . . If I could be convinced all costs (capital, insurance, operating, etc) of a 501 could be comparable to a Meridian over a 5-10 year hold period I'd definitely consider it. The 501 is overkill for my mission, but I'd gladly take the increased capability if it doesn't cost much more. . . . The market is pretty smart. There are many reasons old Citations are almost free and $20k/yr in Mx costs is not one of them. If someone could guarantee me I could run one for twice your Meridian, I’d have one yesterday but:
This is no longer a true statement. The 501s 550s and 560s have been rediscovered and the market has recognized that. People are paying high prices and spending lots of money on cosmetics, panels and engines. They are no longer throw away airplanes. The reason is simple, there’s nothing in this price point that offers this level of performance. Granted I have employed mechanics and perhaps that isn’t totally fair but they are definitely $20k/yr mx airplanes for most people.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 04 Sep 2021, 19:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/19/15 Posts: 1627 Post Likes: +1501 Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
|
|
No way I would rather have a Meridian or TBM over my 501sp Eagle II
Cheaper to buy, On program, faster, safer, way larger, more range, more payload, and cool factor.
I was max gross out of Van Nuys climbing 4000fpm with huge power. At FL350 we were going 390 knots.
Nothing like twin jet performance when heavy and hotter. The Eagle II does not care. So nice to not be worrying about a single or twin prop failing. Just fly the plane and shoot for the moon.
I can’t imagine paying triple for a single turbo prop and having to leave half my family behind, going slow at FL280, and less than 1000nm range.
Sorry but I don’t get the expensive turbo prop market. Too many great jet options out there.
Mike
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: $1MM Meridian vs. $1MM TBM Posted: 04 Sep 2021, 19:14 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/15/16 Posts: 672 Post Likes: +365 Location: Charlotte NC
Aircraft: Piper Mirage
|
|
Sadly, I agree with the above. The TBM850 is a 320ktas airplane but for $1.8M, you can get a lot in the CJ market. It’s a real jump to go from a meridian to those prices….
Val
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|