18 Dec 2025, 22:31 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 16 Aug 2025, 08:20 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 02/09/09 Posts: 6564 Post Likes: +3268 Company: RNP Aviation Services Location: Owosso, MI (KRNP)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If it hasn't flown or hasn't been maintained by a reputable shop - run, don't walk. I would modify this and say "If a prebuy isn't done by a reputable shop - run, don't walk." When I bought my Aerostar, I knew nothing about them. I literally found out about the airplane 24 hours before I owned it. I had 0.5 hours in one a decade earlier. My IA (which had never touched one) and myself got it airworthy and maintained it for five or so years before I sold it. The reputable shop that it was taken to for the prebuy said the squawk list was significantly shorter than many that he sees maintained with an "open checkbook" at several big name Aerostar shops. Like most airplanes, 90% of the maintenance is just common sense items. With support from AOA, the Aerostar Forum and Aerostar, most maintenance isn't difficult. Other than one or two challenging issues, they are just an airplane....
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 16 Aug 2025, 12:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/05/09 Posts: 4490 Post Likes: +3374 Location: Raleigh, NC
Aircraft: L-39
|
|
Username Protected wrote: When I bought my Aerostar, I knew nothing about them. I literally found out about the airplane 24 hours before I owned it. I had 0.5 hours in one a decade earlier.
My IA (which had never touched one) and myself got it airworthy and maintained it for five or so years before I sold it... why did you buy it? Asking for my own knowledge- I'm looking for something practical for my family; and I have decision paralysis between another pressurized twin, or SETP (higher cap-ex).
_________________ "Find worthy causes in your life."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 16 Aug 2025, 18:15 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 02/09/09 Posts: 6564 Post Likes: +3268 Company: RNP Aviation Services Location: Owosso, MI (KRNP)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: why did you buy it? Asking for my own knowledge- I'm looking for something practical for my family; and I have decision paralysis between another pressurized twin, or SETP (higher cap-ex). The price was embarrassing low.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 18 Aug 2025, 19:51 |
|
|
|
|
Looking at putting a GWX75 in my aerostar. Does anyone know if it will hold a 12" antenna or only the 10?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 18 Aug 2025, 19:58 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Joined: 08/16/21 Posts: 1
Aircraft: Cessna 182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Looking at putting a GWX75 in my aerostar. Does anyone know if it will hold a 12" antenna or only the 10? I believe this has now been discontinued in favor of the GWX 8000 StormOptix.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 18 Aug 2025, 21:02 |
|
|
|
|
I believe the GWX75 and GWX8000 are basically the same hardware with different unlock options on XI displays.
Garmin still lists GWX75 as a current product. The unlock to add the fancy GWN8000 stuff is like 14K and 9K for ground clutter suppression... and turbulence detection.... (not sure if the 14K include the 9K, but given its garmin my guess is they are differnt.)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 28 Aug 2025, 19:41 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/18/15 Posts: 1246 Post Likes: +511 Location: Alaska/Idaho
Aircraft: Helio Courier, MU2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Looking at putting a GWX75 in my aerostar. Does anyone know if it will hold a 12" antenna or only the 10? I installed a GWX70 with a 12” antenna into an Aerostar in 2016. The GWX75 is dimensionally identical to the GWX70. The GWX8000 is a GWX75 with a software upgrade that utilizes computing power in the GTN, GX000 Or G500/600xi to post-process the returns
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 28 Aug 2025, 19:44 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/18/15 Posts: 1246 Post Likes: +511 Location: Alaska/Idaho
Aircraft: Helio Courier, MU2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I believe the GWX75 and GWX8000 are basically the same hardware with different unlock options on XI displays.
Garmin still lists GWX75 as a current product. The unlock to add the fancy GWN8000 stuff is like 14K and 9K for ground clutter suppression... and turbulence detection.... (not sure if the 14K include the 9K, but given its garmin my guess is they are differnt.) The GWX8000 unlock includes all unlocks including GCS. I don’t know the current price but it was about $13K when I did it
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: Yesterday, 20:39 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/19/19 Posts: 876 Post Likes: +261 Location: Benton AR KSUZ
Aircraft: Baron B55 Pll
|
|
|
Question about the Superstar II, is there room to put a turbo blanket on or is it even legal?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: Today, 07:41 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 01/24/19 Posts: 1017 Post Likes: +255 Company: Bullard Aviation Services, Inc Location: Ormond Beach, FL (KOMN)
Aircraft: 1978 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Question about the Superstar II, is there room to put a turbo blanket on or is it even legal? On my Superstar II everything around the turbo is well insulated and has either stainless steel sleeves, orange fire sleeve wrap, or is coated with orange high temp silicone. Mine has the Machen control cable relocation where all of the cables are relocated to behind the firewall. Even my engine mount has a stainless steel wrap on it. With that big retractable cowl flap on the top of the engine I am not sure if a turbo wrap would be beneficial or if it would only hinder the cooling transfer / dissipation of the heat by shielding the turbo from the airflow that you get with the cowl flap open, or partially open. I am certainly no aeronautical engineer, but I can only assume that the purpose of moving the air inlets for the ram air from the top half of the cowls to the bottom half was to change the air flow pathway to accommodate the J2BD engines and the exhausts being on top of the engines vs being on the bottom side of the engines. The engine compartments definitely don’t have any extra room in behind the engines to work. Engine photo was taken right after I bought the aircraft prior to me cleaning up the engine compartments. I had to install new dry air pumps due to the aircraft setting for a few years. They lasted less than 5 hours before they started to fail. They weren’t as bad to change out as I thought they would be. Thanks, Frank
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Bullard Aviation Services, Inc. www.BullardAviation.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|