27 Nov 2025, 17:53 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Easiest to fly single pilot cabin class jet Posted: 29 Jan 2018, 12:23 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8605 Post Likes: +11156 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: right now I prefer the CJ1 market. Hi Chip, Really interested in your reasons for this preference. Andrew
Let me clarify, I said I like the market better. If you look at airplane to airplane I agree that the G1000 CJ is a better airplane, I also understand why some would prefer the straight CJ to the CJ1... and I too like the 1+ better. BUT... the value right now is in the CJ1 market.
The 1+ is a $2M dollar airplane. That makes it a different animal all together, most people who have a low $1M's budget can't or won't stretch to $2M
The straight CJ with legacy avionics is favored by owner pilots, but not owner passengers. The G1000 version is a stretch for some with an early CJ1 budget, plus you are going backwards in year model... and as I mentioned they are quite rare! (I'm glad Cessna came out with the STC for ADS-B, sorry my info was old)
The good buys right now are CJ1's, the values took a hit when there was no STC for ADS-B, now there is and the airplanes are starting to creep back up.
Yes, the two tube EFIS (3 tube was an option) does seem like a partial PL21, but with the JetTech STC and a couple of Garmins it makes for a very nice setup.
The CJ and CJ1 are small, they're limited in performance and seats... but the operating cost and acquisition cost are low, the fact that 20 years later this airplanes are still economical to own and operate is huge.
The CJ1 is a wonderful little jet and for a 2000 -2003 airplane on TAP for $1.3M or so... it's hard to beat! That's why I like the market on the CJ1.
They'll be north of $1.5M soon... don't laugh, I said the same thing about Premiers and no one believed me!
_________________ Recent acquisitions - 2019 King Air 350i - 2025 Citation M2Gen2 - 2015 Citation CJ3+
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Easiest to fly single pilot cabin class jet Posted: 29 Jan 2018, 12:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/01/11 Posts: 69 Post Likes: +30
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Martin - given your experience with the P100, I am interested in learning your impressions regarding the P100 useful load and range. I share our hangar with a P100 that the owners (non pilots) have on a 135 certificate. This particular P100 has the following numbers: Basic empty weight 7485 lbs MTOW 10582 Max Fuel 2804 Payload at Max Fuel 293 lbs This means that the airplane can't operate with full fuel and the two fairly robust pilots they have and which they must carry under their 135 ticket. It also means their missions with full seats are restricted to fairly short hops which for their needs seems fine, but in my case it would be a non-starter. As a comparison, my G1000 CJ has a BEW of 6450 (more than 1000 lbs lighter), a MTOW of 10400, Max Fuel of 3220 and a full fuel UL of 730 (which includes 370 lbs more of fuel than the P100). Did you see the P100 as restrictive or is the newer 100E/EV better on the numbers? I'm somewhat surprised about their BEW. I am wondering what they have that could be so different on their bird than mine? I own S/N #84, and while I don't have the MTOW increase (mine is 10,471, its a paperwork only upgrade to get to 10,582), my BEW is 7051. I have the cabinet on mine when you walk up the air stair and I have a rigid lav door in the back. I haven't talked to a lot of other owners yet to determine what could be so different in weight. When I ask the line guys to top me off and not baby it. I end up with around 2750 lbs on board giving me just under 700 lbs payload. I have a somewhat frequent winter trip from Iowa to Ft. Myer's, FL, which is about 1040nm. Last few flights going down I would be getting around a 40-50kt tailwind and would burn about 1900lbs fuel with the arrival procedure. Going back, against that same wind, I was able to make it and burned 2150, leaving me about 650 on board (VFR @ destination). As I am getting more comfortable with the plane, I would not have a problem going into the 500lb range for fuel reserve at my home airport in VFR conditions.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Easiest to fly single pilot cabin class jet Posted: 29 Jan 2018, 12:36 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 2416 Post Likes: +2774 Location: Woodlands TX
Aircraft: C525 D1K Waco PT17
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm somewhat surprised about their BEW. I am wondering what they have that could be so different on their bird than mine? I own S/N #84, and while I don't have the MTOW increase (mine is 10,471, its a paperwork only upgrade to get to 10,582), my BEW is 7051. I have the cabinet on mine when you walk up the air stair and I have a rigid lav door in the back. I haven't talked to a lot of other owners yet to determine what could be so different in weight.
When I ask the line guys to top me off and not baby it. I end up with around 2750 lbs on board giving me just under 700 lbs payload.
I have a somewhat frequent winter trip from Iowa to Ft. Myer's, FL, which is about 1040nm. Last few flights going down I would be getting around a 40-50kt tailwind and would burn about 1900lbs fuel with the arrival procedure. Going back, against that same wind, I was able to make it and burned 2150, leaving me about 650 on board (VFR @ destination). As I am getting more comfortable with the plane, I would not have a problem going into the 500lb range for fuel reserve at my home airport in VFR conditions. I will ask to see what options they have that makes this bird 400 lbs heavier than yours. For one, their pilots need to go on a diet... Regarding fuel, I'm a chicken (and also fly in an environment with less airport options). I don't think I have ever landed with less than 800 lbs - 500 lbs seems brave. I have arrived twice at a VFR airport to find the runway closed due to disabled aircraft (flat tire once, gear up a second time). Flying to the closest airport consumed 300 lbs - which would have meant 200 lbs in the tanks under your scenario. I don't like it when my hands start to sweat.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Easiest to fly single pilot cabin class jet Posted: 29 Jan 2018, 12:38 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20781 Post Likes: +26295 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm somewhat surprised about their BEW. Being ~400 lbs apart, I smell BOW/BEW confusion. Maybe they include 2 pilots in their "empty" weight? Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Easiest to fly single pilot cabin class jet Posted: 29 Jan 2018, 12:41 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 2416 Post Likes: +2774 Location: Woodlands TX
Aircraft: C525 D1K Waco PT17
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm somewhat surprised about their BEW. Being ~400 lbs apart, I smell BOW/BEW confusion. Maybe they include 2 pilots in their "empty" weight? Mike C. Perhaps - I will ask to see if I have the numbers right. At any rate, their pilots are not 200 lbs a piece - it's more like 250. That's when exercise and staying fit pays off - I'm a frugal 148 lbs...
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Easiest to fly single pilot cabin class jet Posted: 29 Jan 2018, 13:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/01/11 Posts: 69 Post Likes: +30
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So the story on the P100 in my hangar is that it's a 100E which has speed brakes (your's from the serial number I believe does not), and an "updated" nicer and heavier interior. They also have several entertainment/wifi options. The number they gave me is Basic Empty Weight - not Operating Weight which for a SP jet would include a 200 lb pilot. Ouch. I have only known the 100 without speed brakes and while I could see how you would use it to dive. I've been happy managing without it and don't find myself restricted without them.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Easiest to fly single pilot cabin class jet Posted: 29 Jan 2018, 13:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 2416 Post Likes: +2774 Location: Woodlands TX
Aircraft: C525 D1K Waco PT17
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So the story on the P100 in my hangar is that it's a 100E which has speed brakes (your's from the serial number I believe does not), and an "updated" nicer and heavier interior. They also have several entertainment/wifi options. The number they gave me is Basic Empty Weight - not Operating Weight which for a SP jet would include a 200 lb pilot. Correction - their pilot just called and the weight (7485) I was provided does include 1 pilot (200 lbs), so their BEW is 7285. It's still pretty restrictive but not as bad as I thought.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Easiest to fly single pilot cabin class jet Posted: 29 Jan 2018, 14:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/08/11 Posts: 919 Post Likes: +1279 Location: California
Aircraft: C182 B350
|
|
Quote: Why would a Mustang be easier than an M2 or a CJ3+. Both have the Garmin 3000, and look pretty much the same to fly. But I'm an amateur pilot, so I'm asking.
Well, for an "amateur pilot", you nailed it. G3000 makes G1000 look like A/N Range. (much to my surprise/delight) Also, don't confuse the M2 with your grandpappy's CJ1. Solid 400kt airplane, ~25 min to FL410. Attachment: File Jan 29, 10 38 28 AM.jpeg (Actually, to be fair, I can't speak to the HA-420, EMB-505, whatever...maybe others similarly equipped, as I haven't flown those...)
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ NOT FOR NAVIGATIONAL USE
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Easiest to fly single pilot cabin class jet Posted: 31 Jan 2018, 00:21 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/01/12 Posts: 32 Post Likes: +25 Location: St Petersburg, FL
Aircraft: Phenom 300
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Now, if by brake issues you were referring to that it's contaminated runway performance is not the best, than that would be more accurate. Given a wet runway, you need 5000 ft in most scenarios to be by the book.
I don't have much wet experience yet, but there are very few scenarios where you need 5000 ft to be by the book in the P100. To calculate book wet you take the unfactored dry rounded up, and look at the unfactored wet. That yields the book number. Attachment: Screen Shot 2018-01-30 at 11.13.01 PM.png For example sea level ISA at 7900 lbs yields 2363 ft dry and 3000 ft wet "actual landing distance" - 50 ft above runway threshold to complete stop. The 4600 ft factored wet takes the actual x 1.92 to calculate "Required landing distance", as used by some operating regulations (Part 121 ops?)
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ ATP | Phenom 300 N329MC, Icon A5 N1BA | Ex SR22G3 TN, G1, Eclipse 500, Carbon Cub, Phenom 100
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Easiest to fly single pilot cabin class jet Posted: 31 Jan 2018, 00:25 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/01/12 Posts: 32 Post Likes: +25 Location: St Petersburg, FL
Aircraft: Phenom 300
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Correction - their pilot just called and the weight (7485) I was provided does include 1 pilot (200 lbs), so their BEW is 7285. It's still pretty restrictive but not as bad as I thought.
Still hefty.... Mine weighs in at 6990 lbs, and with a MTOW 10582 I have 3592 lbs to play with. Fuel tops of at 2750 most days, so 842 lbs if topped off.
_________________ ATP | Phenom 300 N329MC, Icon A5 N1BA | Ex SR22G3 TN, G1, Eclipse 500, Carbon Cub, Phenom 100
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Easiest to fly single pilot cabin class jet Posted: 31 Jan 2018, 00:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/01/12 Posts: 32 Post Likes: +25 Location: St Petersburg, FL
Aircraft: Phenom 300
|
|
Username Protected wrote: As a comparison, my G1000 CJ has a BEW of 6450 (more than 1000 lbs lighter), a MTOW of 10400, Max Fuel of 3220 and a full fuel UL of 730 (which includes 370 lbs more of fuel than the P100). Did you see the P100 as restrictive or is the newer 100E/EV better on the numbers? Here are the P100 cruise numbers and FF. Looses speed at FL400/410 (the Eclipse is faster up there), but FL370/380 is the sweet spot. Attachment: Screen Shot 2018-01-30 at 11.36.02 PM.png
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ ATP | Phenom 300 N329MC, Icon A5 N1BA | Ex SR22G3 TN, G1, Eclipse 500, Carbon Cub, Phenom 100
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|