30 Nov 2025, 20:39 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Buying a PC12 Posted: 16 Jul 2015, 18:48 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/23/09 Posts: 1128 Post Likes: +667 Location: KSJT
Aircraft: PC-24 Citabria 7GCBC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Our BOW is as follows your weights may vary
45= 6451 47= 6530 NG= 6651 Those seem like heavy planes. I know of some early 45s that were below 6100. My NG BOW is 6596 (BOW includes the pilot.) We operate in the south (typically ISA +10-15) and seldom see 270kts unless it's really cold. We also operate "by the book" which sometimes limits your torque on cold days. Some operators just set ITT to 780 and forget it which will give more TAS - but that's not what P&W recommends. There is a free IPhone/iPad app that you can download that has the pc12 performance data. Our plane's performance matches the book amazingly close on all counts.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Buying a PC12 Posted: 16 Jul 2015, 19:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Some operators just set ITT to 780 and forget it which will give more TAS - but that's not what P&W recommends. . That's how I run mine. That's how they teach at SimCom. That's how the Pilatus sales reps teach. That's how everyone I talk to on POPA runs them.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Buying a PC12 Posted: 16 Jul 2015, 20:04 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/23/09 Posts: 1128 Post Likes: +667 Location: KSJT
Aircraft: PC-24 Citabria 7GCBC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Some operators just set ITT to 780 and forget it which will give more TAS - but that's not what P&W recommends. . That's how I run mine. That's how they teach at SimCom. That's how the Pilatus sales reps teach. That's how everyone I talk to on POPA runs them.
Yea, but watch the presentation that P&W gave at the POPA 2014 conference (video on POPAs password protected website) - they explicitly say to set power by the book or max 780 ITT whichever is lower. The training providers will teach you the emergency and IFR stuff, but I don't think they are very effective in teaching ownership items - like how to run your engine that promote lower overhaul cost.
I know other operators that do exactly what you do. By always setting to 780, your engine probably isn't going to blow up tomorrow but all other things being equal, operating at power settings above the book, I bet will increase ones HSI/Overhaul cost.
I'm no turbine expert, just doing what the manufacturer recommends.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Buying a PC12 Posted: 17 Jul 2015, 10:02 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/13/11 Posts: 2755 Post Likes: +2187 Company: Aeronautical People Shuffler Location: Picayune, MS (KHSA)
Aircraft: KA350/E55/DA-62
|
|
Username Protected wrote: We operate in the south (typically ISA +10-15) and seldom see 270kts unless it's really cold. We also operate "by the book" which sometimes limits your torque on cold days. Some operators just set ITT to 780 and forget it which will give more TAS - but that's not what P&W recommends.
There is a free IPhone/iPad app that you can download that has the pc12 performance data. Our plane's performance matches the book amazingly close on all counts. Crandall and I went back and forth with this a while back. No where in the Pilatus POH cruise charts/checklist does it say to set cruise power using ITT. It always says to set power using the torque charts. We run hand written power trend for every single flight, not the computer download that EPPS pulls. It is quite amazing how consistent ITT numbers will be if you run the plane on torque settings. Our NG runs 763-765 every time. If it have a couple flights where I am noticing a trend up to say 770, I know the aircraft needs a look, 9/10 its a compressor wash and boom back to 763-765. If you are running ITT I don't see how any trend information whether hand written or pulled from the software will give any useful information. Simcom is not the end all for information, there are times where their information was not correct, we have found it, told them, and they later changed it. POPA is not the end all either. I know about 10 pro pc12 pilots, none are POPA, probably cause its a few hundred a year to have a POPA account. The owners group, simcom, and salesmen are going to teach whats easy and works, not whats correct and recommended.
_________________ The sound of a second engine still running after the first engine fails is why I like having two.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Buying a PC12 Posted: 17 Jul 2015, 10:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/13/11 Posts: 2755 Post Likes: +2187 Company: Aeronautical People Shuffler Location: Picayune, MS (KHSA)
Aircraft: KA350/E55/DA-62
|
|
These are the trend books I was referring to, EPPS sells them. Attachment: IMG_3796.JPG We also keep a laminated copy of the max cruise torque setting charts up front with us. Attachment: IMG_3798.JPG If you run the pilatus app it will never tell you to set power using ITT, its always a torque setting.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ The sound of a second engine still running after the first engine fails is why I like having two.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Buying a PC12 Posted: 17 Jul 2015, 10:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/23/09 Posts: 1128 Post Likes: +667 Location: KSJT
Aircraft: PC-24 Citabria 7GCBC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If you run the pilatus app it will never tell you to set power using ITT, its always a torque setting.
Shawn, I think we agree. I set power according to the charts as long as the torque setting doesn't produce an ITT over 780. If it's colder, we won't hit 780. If it's a hot day ISA +15 (typically the case where we fly) then we will "temp out" at 780 and not make the book torque setting. The Pilatus POH/AFM (as well as P&W) does recommend not exceeding 780 in cruise. Jason, I'm not sure we operate the same if you ALWAYS set to 780.  On cold days you should be limited by torque and ITT will be less.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Buying a PC12 Posted: 17 Jul 2015, 11:20 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Jason, I'm not sure we operate the same if you ALWAYS set to 780.  On cold days you should be limited by torque and ITT will be less. I never go over 36.9 on torque either. I set to lower than the higher of the 2.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Buying a PC12 Posted: 17 Jul 2015, 12:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/23/09 Posts: 1128 Post Likes: +667 Location: KSJT
Aircraft: PC-24 Citabria 7GCBC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I never go over 36.9 on torque either. I set to lower than the higher of the 2. Yes but that's not the only torque limit - do you look up your altitude and temp to get your torque setting (using the QRH charts or the app)?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Buying a PC12 Posted: 17 Jul 2015, 12:02 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yes but that's not the only torque limit - do you look up your altitude and temp to get your torque setting (using the QRH charts or the app)? At altitude (25K) your torque is much lower than 36.9. The only time I'm at 36.9 or higher is in climb.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Buying a PC12 Posted: 17 Jul 2015, 12:13 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/16/07 Posts: 19149 Post Likes: +30929 Company: Real Estate development Location: Addison -North Dallas(ADS), Texas
Aircraft: In between
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Presumably HSI costs go up the hotter you consistently run the engine on PT6's just like on TPE's? I think I've pointed out before, our long time PT6 guy says the most common reason the engines come in before TBO is for sulfide accumulations on blades from being run too cool. Of course, they can be run too hot, but not running higher temps within limits can have negative affects also on these engines.
_________________ Dave Siciliano, ATP
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Buying a PC12 Posted: 17 Jul 2015, 12:17 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 04/28/12 Posts: 4976 Post Likes: +3598 Location: Kansas City, KS (KLXT)
Aircraft: 1972 Duke A60
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Presumably HSI costs go up the hotter you consistently run the engine on PT6's just like on TPE's? I think I've pointed out before, our long time PT6 guy says the most common reason the engines come in before TBO is for sulfide accumulations on blades from being run too cool. Of course, they can be run too hot, but not running higher temps within limits can have negative affects also on these engines.
Sounds like they need an occasional "Italian tune-up"
_________________ CFII/MEI
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Buying a PC12 Posted: 17 Jul 2015, 12:19 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: In high altitude cruise I've never had ours temp out while running on the torque charts. When was your last compressor wash? It makes a huge difference on ITT. You guys never push full forward on the PCL on take off? I think it goes in 42... Something I'm full forward on the PCL every takeoff. I keep bleed air off until I'm climbing to keep temps down.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|