25 Jun 2025, 14:37 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The definitive Piaggio P180 Avanti thread. Posted: 08 May 2024, 16:01 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/15/17 Posts: 1114 Post Likes: +579 Company: Cessna (retired)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What model TPE331 would match a -66 Pratt? How much does one cost? Heavier/Lighter than the original engine? Efficiency?
Looking at these charts a -10 has the the flat rated horsepower but itakes a -14 to have the same thermodynamic horsepower. How does that work?
The -14 is awesome for power, but not so much for overhaul etc as it's the "big block" Garrett and more costly. The one to go for is a the -12, most likely. That's the most powerful of the "small block" TPE's. One problem with the Garretts is that they're not reverse flow inlets, so a little harder to adapt to a pusher config. I'm sure it's doable, just need to figure out the exhaust/inlet/shaft thing. Not sure the cost new, I've heard Honeywell also take every OEM to the cleaners, but at least te overhauls are considerably cheaper than PT6. Looking forward to seeing more about the Catalyst.
The Embraer pusher that was cancelled was to have 331's. Pretty major surgery in rearrangment of engine sections IIRC.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The definitive Piaggio P180 Avanti thread. Posted: 08 May 2024, 16:42 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/21/13 Posts: 449 Post Likes: +447 Company: Horizon Aviation
Aircraft: Pitts M12, T-6, D17S
|
|
Doesn’t every predator drone have a 331 in the pusher config?
Zeke
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The definitive Piaggio P180 Avanti thread. Posted: 08 May 2024, 22:30 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6652 Post Likes: +5959 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Hadn't seen it from this angle before. Attachment: IMG_9822.jpg
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Without love, where would you be now?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The definitive Piaggio P180 Avanti thread. Posted: 25 May 2024, 20:33 |
|
 |
|
|
Joined: 09/24/22 Posts: 4 Post Likes: +1
Aircraft: Diamond DA-62
|
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The definitive Piaggio P180 Avanti thread. Posted: 26 May 2024, 00:20 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7393 Post Likes: +4861 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: https://www.controller.com/listing/for-sale/232152463/2006-piaggio-p-180-avanti-ii-turboprop-aircraft
This asks for a significantly lower price than others. Are there some reasons behind this? Pretty high total time on the airframe, I would guess. Engines have probably been overhauled twice (2000 hours ago would be roughly 7200 hours at 2nd overhaul, if they did it at 3600 intervals), which might mean next o/h could have expensive parts coming due. Depends what all was done at previous overhauls, devil is in details, and a real PT6 expert might be able to give useful guidance in that respect. Says PT6A-66 engines in advertisement when most Avanti II came with -66B engines. Some of the early IIs may have had -66 though. Could just be typo in the advert, but it would be worth understanding which they really are before buying. -66 (non-B) would be somewhat lower valuation in a II. Call Bryon Mobley at Wetzel and ask about it, he was pretty straightforward and helpful when I spoke with him before I bought. He has posted at times in this thread.
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The definitive Piaggio P180 Avanti thread. Posted: 31 May 2024, 11:21 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/24/13 Posts: 9806 Post Likes: +4584 Company: Aviation Tools / CCX Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: As a complete aside, Rinaldo Piaggio started the company in 1884, which makes Piaggio 140 years old this year. Must be the oldest continuously operated aircraft manufacturer in the world, I'm guessing. They've built aircraft since 1915, so almost 110 years of experience in aviation now.  Morane-Saulnier which became SEEMS, then Aerospatiale, then Socata then Daher was founded in 1911. Manufacturing aircraft continuously.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The definitive Piaggio P180 Avanti thread. Posted: 31 May 2024, 16:43 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/24/13 Posts: 9806 Post Likes: +4584 Company: Aviation Tools / CCX Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Well you are both wrong. Short Bros. of Ireland is the oldest continuous manufacturer in the world.... 1908. I wasn't claiming oldest! Just older than Piaggio
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The definitive Piaggio P180 Avanti thread. Posted: 31 May 2024, 19:48 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7393 Post Likes: +4861 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: As a complete aside, Rinaldo Piaggio started the company in 1884, which makes Piaggio 140 years old this year. Must be the oldest continuously operated aircraft manufacturer in the world, I'm guessing. They've built aircraft since 1915, so almost 110 years of experience in aviation now.  I wish they were more actively building airplanes today, to build some critical mass in the market. There may be a few, but it’s kind of a trickle.
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The definitive Piaggio P180 Avanti thread. Posted: 01 Jun 2024, 15:45 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/25/20 Posts: 35 Post Likes: +20
|
|
Regarding the higher time P180 mentioned above (1121) Happy to discuss, but I’m +8 at the moment in Europe after EBACE. Not a bad airplane, but we are helping the owner sort through the mess that Aerovanti left…It does have a D coming due, along with a few other things, but it does have fresh Hots/mid time engines. This aircraft does have -66’s and was delivered that way, along with several other early II’s. This was common specifically with early Avantair II’s that got delivered prior to the 66B certification. I can’t remember exactly, but I think Piaggio offered a no cost swap to the B post cert, or a discount if the straight 66 was kept. Avantair opted to keep the 66’s, likely due to lower cost. We’ve got this aircraft available, along with 1039 and 1056. My associate Michael Ioffredo will be in the office this coming week and can answer any other questions about any of them. http://www.wetzelaviation.com, (Mike’s cell 720-326-0796)michael@wetzelaviation.com. Thanks Bryon Mobley
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|