banner
banner

19 Jan 2026, 11:11 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 335 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 ... 23  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Williams engine programs - my research
PostPosted: 08 Apr 2023, 20:21 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/27/10
Posts: 2335
Post Likes: +1243
Location: Phoenix (KDVT) & Grand Rapids (KGRR)
Aircraft: BE36
Username Protected wrote:
I’m comfortable, but not rich enough for a jet, especially a old jet

So you’re on the sidelines, criticizing guys who jump in with both feet for buying a legacy Citation? Seriously?

I appreciate all the knowledge you have accrued flying for guys who have the wherewithal to buy a more expensive plane and hire you as their pilot. Have you questioned your boss about why he hasn’t bought a new Global or Gulfstream, but rather is satisfied with an old Japanese airframe retrofitted with (admittedly fabulous) engines produced by a small business who happen to be brilliant businessmen? (By the way, I’m pretty sure I’ve sold more end items containing Williams engines then probably anyone else).

I would respect his decision as much as I would the guy who decides to buy a new Global or the guy who buys a legacy Citation. Everyone is in a different situation. For me, a legacy Citation with Pratts is far and away the best fit, all things considered. I’m not as fluent, so I’ll just close with “what Mike said”.

_________________
Since Retirement: CL65 type rating, flew 121, CE680, CE525S, and CE500 type ratings.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Williams engine programs - my research
PostPosted: 08 Apr 2023, 20:21 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8867
Post Likes: +11578
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
Another FWIW I think the Citation V is one of the best overall jets made.

However, for clarity, it won’t go 1800nm and 420kts. You do have to pick one.

You have several choices:

FL350 MCT 1200 nm, ~427 KTAS cruise

FL410 MCT 1520 nm, ~418 KTAS cruise

FL450 MCT 1670 nm, ~395 KTAS cruise

FL450 LRC 1860 nm, ~365 KTAS cruise

This is with reserves, not to dry tanks, no wind, ISA.

Mike C.


Exactly.

I was just pointing out that it will do 420kts, it will do 1800nm, but it won’t do “420kts and 1800nm”
_________________
Be kind. You never know what someone is going through.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Williams engine programs - my research
PostPosted: 08 Apr 2023, 20:23 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/04/13
Posts: 4716
Post Likes: +3723
Location: Hampton, VA
Username Protected wrote:
Another FWIW I think the Citation V is one of the best overall jets made.

However, for clarity, it won’t go 1800nm and 420kts. You do have to pick one.

You have several choices:

FL350 MCT 1200 nm, ~427 KTAS cruise

FL410 MCT 1520 nm, ~418 KTAS cruise

FL450 MCT 1670 nm, ~395 KTAS cruise

FL450 LRC 1860 nm, ~365 KTAS cruise

This is with reserves, not to dry tanks, no wind, ISA.

Mike C.



Why so slow?

Top

 Post subject: Re: Williams engine programs - my research
PostPosted: 08 Apr 2023, 20:24 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/04/13
Posts: 4716
Post Likes: +3723
Location: Hampton, VA
Username Protected wrote:
I’m comfortable, but not rich enough for a jet, especially a old jet

So you’re on the sidelines, criticizing guys who jump in with both feet for buying a legacy Citation? Seriously?

I appreciate all the knowledge you have accrued flying for guys who have the wherewithal to buy a more expensive plane and hire you as their pilot. Have you questioned your boss about why he hasn’t bought a new Global or Gulfstream, but rather is satisfied with an old Japanese airframe retrofitted with (admittedly fabulous) engines produced by a small business who happen to be brilliant businessmen? (By the way, I’m pretty sure I’ve sold more end items containing Williams engines then probably anyone else).

I would respect his decision as much as I would the guy who decides to buy a new Global or the guy who buys a legacy Citation. Everyone is in a different situation. For me, a legacy Citation with Pratts is far and away the best fit, all things considered. I’m not as fluent, so I’ll just close with “what Mike said”.


Sidelines? I’m flying the plane lol!


I have been blessed with whom I worked for, and yes we had talks on airframes

My last two bosses were also pilots

My saddle, a old prat jet, wouldn’t be on the leader board above phenoms and CJ3s for speed and range if it wasn’t for its new FJs (and pylons)


Image

Top

 Post subject: Re: Williams engine programs - my research
PostPosted: 08 Apr 2023, 22:05 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21099
Post Likes: +26534
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Why so slow?

Because I'd rather have more airport options with a big straight wing that lands slow and easy.

The difference between 420 and 450 knots is not much on any given trip. You'd have to contrive some corner example, like a long flight into a big headwind, to get that difference to reach 10 minutes. On a typical flight it will be under 5 minutes.

Once you get past mach 0.73 or so, the cost and complexity to go faster shoots up exponentially. You generally need swept wings above mach 0.80, and you need transonic design to go above mach 0.90.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Williams engine programs - my research
PostPosted: 08 Apr 2023, 22:22 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21099
Post Likes: +26534
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I have been blessed with whom I worked for, and yes we had talks on airframes

My last two bosses were also pilots

Do you own and pay for the jet you are flying?

Being an owner changes a lot of things when it is your money your are spending. It is easy to spend other people's money.

Quote:
My saddle, a old prat jet, wouldn’t be on the leader board above phenoms and CJ3s for speed and range if it wasn’t for its new FJs (and pylons)

The other two airplanes, P300, CJ3, are way faster than the 400XTi when your SIC doesn't show up.

There are a lot of factors to effective speed. Simpler plane to get started and going, able to use closer airports, being able to fly it single pilot, being able to land on wet, snow, ice, all those things add to effective speed and capability.

If I could fly the 400 single pilot, I would have considered it seriously over the V. But I don't think that is ever going to happen, so it isn't a choice. I am not buying an airplane to end up chartering a human to ride along on every flight. I really like having an SIC in flight, but absolutely hate everything about it when on the ground. It is a real schedule killer.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Williams engine programs - my research
PostPosted: 08 Apr 2023, 22:24 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/04/13
Posts: 4716
Post Likes: +3723
Location: Hampton, VA
Username Protected wrote:
I have been blessed with whom I worked for, and yes we had talks on airframes

My last two bosses were also pilots

Do you own and pay for the jet you are flying?

Being an owner changes a lot of things when it is your money your are spending. It is easy to spend other people's money.

Quote:
My saddle, a old prat jet, wouldn’t be on the leader board above phenoms and CJ3s for speed and range if it wasn’t for its new FJs (and pylons)

The other two airplanes, P300, CJ3, are way faster than the 400XTi when your SIC doesn't show up.

There are a lot of factors to effective speed. Simpler plane to get started and going, able to use closer airports, being able to fly it single pilot, being able to land on wet, snow, ice, all those things add to effective speed and capability.

If I could fly the 400 single pilot, I would have considered it seriously over the V. But I don't think that is ever going to happen, so it isn't a choice. I am not buying an airplane to end up chartering a human to ride along on every flight. I really like having an SIC in flight, but absolutely hate everything about it when on the ground. It is a real schedule killer.

Mike C.


Uhh, well a Uber is faster for your pax if your don’t show up too, but that’s a silly argument

Top

 Post subject: Re: Williams engine programs - my research
PostPosted: 08 Apr 2023, 23:37 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21099
Post Likes: +26534
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Uhh, well a Uber is faster for your pax if your don’t show up too, but that’s a silly argument

Not a silly argument. Dependency on having an SIC is a very real issue that costs time, money, and opportunity. And sometimes I am the pax and the pilot, just flying myself somewhere. That's the owner flown lifestyle, not the pro pilot one.

What does an SIC cost for a week long trip? Hotel, car, food, daily rate, etc? My V may use more fuel than a 400XTi, but when you cost out the SIC, it is cheaper.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Williams engine programs - my research
PostPosted: 08 Apr 2023, 23:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/04/13
Posts: 4716
Post Likes: +3723
Location: Hampton, VA
Username Protected wrote:
Uhh, well a Uber is faster for your pax if your don’t show up too, but that’s a silly argument

Not a silly argument. Dependency on having an SIC is a very real issue that costs time, money, and opportunity. And sometimes I am the pax and the pilot, just flying myself somewhere. That's the owner flown lifestyle, not the pro pilot one.

What does an SIC cost for a week long trip? Hotel, car, food, daily rate, etc? My V may use more fuel than a 400XTi, but when you cost out the SIC, it is cheaper.

Mike C.



The best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained pilot


If you’re looking to save money on crew, probably should stay as pax

Top

 Post subject: Re: Williams engine programs - my research
PostPosted: 09 Apr 2023, 00:07 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21099
Post Likes: +26534
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
The best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained pilot

I have that.

Quote:
If you’re looking to save money on crew, probably should stay as pax

So nobody should fly without two pilots? That eliminates much of GA.

You do like spending other people's money with expensive advice. I get the impression you aren't paying for what you are recommending, either.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Williams engine programs - my research
PostPosted: 09 Apr 2023, 00:09 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/04/13
Posts: 4716
Post Likes: +3723
Location: Hampton, VA
Username Protected wrote:
The best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained pilot

I have that.

Quote:
If you’re looking to save money on crew, probably should stay as pax

So nobody should fly without two pilots? That eliminates much of GA.

You do like spending other people's money with expensive advice.

Mike C.



I’m a big single pilot guy, that said trying to save money on crew is silly in the big picture

Top

 Post subject: Re: Williams engine programs - my research
PostPosted: 09 Apr 2023, 01:21 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21099
Post Likes: +26534
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
trying to save money on crew is silly in the big picture

Are you paying for an SIC out of your own pocket?

If not, then you aren't making those decisions with your own money.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Williams engine programs - my research
PostPosted: 09 Apr 2023, 01:36 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/04/13
Posts: 4716
Post Likes: +3723
Location: Hampton, VA
Username Protected wrote:
trying to save money on crew is silly in the big picture

Are you paying for an SIC out of your own pocket?

If not, then you aren't making those decisions with your own money.

Mike C.



I’m a working pilot, outside of my personal plane I pay nothing out, that said I’ve dealt with many operators, and the cheapest ones end up spending the most on one front or another

Top

 Post subject: Re: Williams engine programs - my research
PostPosted: 09 Apr 2023, 07:01 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/17/21
Posts: 92
Post Likes: +42
Aircraft: C550
Mike C. Wrote:
“Do you own and pay for the jet you are flying?

Being an owner changes a lot of things when it is your money your are spending. It is easy to spend other people's money.”

You can tell by the way MacGregor talks he has no skin in the game . I’ve flown with a couple of very skilled pilots who weren’t owners & they don’t treat the plane the same as an owner operator.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Williams engine programs - my research
PostPosted: 09 Apr 2023, 08:45 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 5335
Post Likes: +5393
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
Username Protected wrote:
Mike C. Wrote:
“Do you own and pay for the jet you are flying?

Being an owner changes a lot of things when it is your money your are spending. It is easy to spend other people's money.”

You can tell by the way MacGregor talks he has no skin in the game . I’ve flown with a couple of very skilled pilots who weren’t owners & they don’t treat the plane the same as an owner operator.


I slow my personal citation down to 90 gph when going on short hops and always roll to the end of the runway. When I fly with pro pilots in their non owned birds I routinely watch them use 200 gph and jam the brakes own on the same short hops. If you own it, you usually treat it better.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 335 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 ... 23  Next



PlaneAC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.ElectroairTile.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.Plane Salon Beechtalk.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.avnav.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.