29 Oct 2025, 17:50 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 23 Sep 2025, 21:34 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/30/20 Posts: 113 Post Likes: +72 Location: Findlay, Ohio
Aircraft: 1981 501SP
|
|
|
Is there the option to install a PFD controller in a 501 such as the Garmin GCU 485? I think I’ve seen where Mike C has it in is V but wasn’t sure if it was STC’d for the 501.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 24 Sep 2025, 08:13 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5292 Post Likes: +5291
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Is there the option to install a PFD controller in a 501 such as the Garmin GCU 485? I think I’ve seen where Mike C has it in is V but wasn’t sure if it was STC’d for the 501. Yes, easy to do! It is approved for the 501.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 24 Sep 2025, 08:15 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5292 Post Likes: +5291
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: With the 501 I just give the FBO my fuel order and roll If you can keep the line monkeys from resting the fuel hose on the deice boots. I catch them doing that all the time. Fueling an MU2 was no fun, but I trusted some FBOs to do it right. The Citation is much simpler to fuel. The only problem is the time it takes to get that much more fuel into the tank. I've actually done more self serve in the Citation than I did in the MU2. Mike C.
I put brand new boots on my bird and they put that knurled portion of the fuel hose on my boots; I was not pleased. I don't walk away anymore.
Last edited on 24 Sep 2025, 12:48, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 25 Sep 2025, 22:37 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/13/20 Posts: 254 Post Likes: +183 Location: KLOU/KJVY
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 501 vs MU2.
seems like they'd be similar cost to operate? I know the MU2 burns less gas (and a little slower), but from a phase inspection comparison, similar?
anybody ever move from 1 to the other? Both JD and I had MU-2s and 501s. The 501 is unquestionably less expensive to maintain and an order of magnitude safer, more capable and enjoyable. I like the MU-2 but it's in a different league than a jet.
I concur of course. Ok to skip the MU2 and go straight to the 501. You won't regret it. Loved my MU2, but only because i didn't have the 501 yet. I've spent $33k on Mx/repairs/parts this year (75% through the year), actually just did the calculation for an acquaintance yesterday who is now considering going to the 501.
_________________ -Citation 501 -Robinson R66
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 23 Oct 2025, 15:19 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20716 Post Likes: +26146 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: so what is the difference between the 500sp, and the 501? There is no 500sp. There is a 500, Citation I, part 25, 2 pilot airplane. There is a 501, Citation I/SP, part 23, single pilot airplane. Some folks call them 501SP, but I don't believe that term was ever used by Cessna, at least not officially. There are basically the same airplane physically and there is/was a way to convert one to the other by SB. There are 550, Citation II and 551, Citation II/SP in a similar way. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 23 Oct 2025, 16:33 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/04/13 Posts: 2789 Post Likes: +1408 Location: Little Rock, Ar
Aircraft: A36 C560 C551 C560XL
|
|
|
I believe there is a 501 that is not SP.
Robert T
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 23 Oct 2025, 16:46 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/13/20 Posts: 254 Post Likes: +183 Location: KLOU/KJVY
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I believe there is a 501 that is not SP.
Robert T News to me
_________________ -Citation 501 -Robinson R66
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 23 Oct 2025, 17:49 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5292 Post Likes: +5291
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I believe there is a 501 that is not SP.
Robert T ALL airplanes built on/after 1977 left the factory physically the same in the 501 configuration. If it was immediately exported to Canada or Europe or Japan it was called a 500 and was a 2 pilot airplane. If it was for the US market, it was a single pilot 501. 99% of the export post 1977 export 500s trickled back to the US and were converted to a 501. There are still a few 501s that are actually still 500s on paper and therefore technically are 2 pilot airplanes. I've seen it twice in my life! There was one or two short wing 1976 or before 500s that were converted to 501s by the Cessna factory!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 24 Oct 2025, 00:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20716 Post Likes: +26146 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I believe there is a 501 that is not SP. Any 501 can be a 2 pilot airplane if it doesn't meet the single pilot requirements in the AFM. Attachment: c501-min-crew.png As far as I know, all 501s are single pilot eligible if the equipment matches the AFM requirements for single pilot ops. Mike C.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 25 Oct 2025, 13:28 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/20 Posts: 1716 Post Likes: +1772 Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I believe there is a 501 that is not SP. Any 501 can be a 2 pilot airplane if it doesn't meet the single pilot requirements in the AFM. Attachment: c501-min-crew.png As far as I know, all 501s are single pilot eligible if the equipment matches the AFM requirements for single pilot ops. At the risk of resurrecting a dead horse and then beating it again, I would like to revisit the SIC logging rules in a 501. This is still a few years away but my son is currently thinking that he wants to be a professional pilot. I think it would help his efforts to be hired into a regional if he had a CE-500 SIC type rating and some turbine time in his logbook. The SIC type rating is easy - I can do it or my instructor said that he would be happy to do it during one of my 61.58s.
The question is how to get him turbine time (it wouldn't be PIC of course but I would think it will still help his resume?). The reason I am thinking about this now is if this won't work I need to be looking to buy a 550 but I am still short on total time to get an SPE. Plus I don't really need a 550 and it brings potential complications with international flights, higher fees due to higher weight, etc.
Based on Mike's post above, do I just need to make my yoke-mounted ident switch a field-removable thing? I don't ever use it - I just push the button on my GTN750 to ident. But it would need to work if I want to fly it single pilot legally.
Any other ideas from the BT brain trust?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|