banner
banner

19 Nov 2025, 13:36 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 268 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 21:56 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/14/08
Posts: 3133
Post Likes: +2674
Location: KGBR
Aircraft: D50
Username Protected wrote:
They had new paint, new interior, modern avionics, and low time motors?


1978 Duke 300 SMOH both sides (good shop) and recently done, 3 year old paint, 3 year old leather interior, rebuilt autopilot, winglets, extended fuel, NDH, $60k. Needed $40k spent on the panel to make it pristine. So, $100k for a beautiful low time Duke with modern panel

Bought many Colemill Barons with low to mid time engines for under $100k and an extremely nice 58P with a 100 hour engine and 1000 hour engine for $100k with good avionics. All these planes had full de-ice and radar as well.

Plenty of twins out there for sale and there will be more. More people are flocking to experimentals and plastic planes with parachutes.


Uncle.
Will you buy my next plane for me?

Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 22:01 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/19/08
Posts: 12160
Post Likes: +3545
Aircraft: C55
No, but I will sell you one :D

I missed the "Army" Tbone by $5k. That one was modern and nice, just needed some housekeeping. REALLY nice twins still bring good money, but they better be the latest version with all the goodies and look brand new. A local business man just spent $1.5M upgrading his C90B. It has new engines with every Raiseback option, G1000, custom interior, etc. He doesn't care about the cost. It sets next to his 2013 Citation Excel. Some people don't care about the cost.

_________________
The kid gets it all. Just plant us in the damn garden, next to the stupid lion.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 23:14 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 03/18/09
Posts: 1162
Post Likes: +248
Company: Elemental - Pipistrel
Location: KHCR
Aircraft: Citation CJ2+
Username Protected wrote:

Forget that 310. You need a newer 58 and I may have just the bird ;)


If I find a really great deal on a 58 I'll bite. But I like doing the work to it. It's fun

_________________
--
Jason Talley
Pipistrel Distributor
http://www.elemental.aero

CJ2+
7GCBC
Pipsitrel Panthera


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 23:18 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/16/09
Posts: 7313
Post Likes: +2188
Location: Houston, TX
Aircraft: BE-TBD
Old piston twins will be very welcome at airshows and fly-ins. And anywhere else men want to be seen as being men.

_________________
AI generated post. Any misrepresentation, inaccuracies or omissions not attributable to member.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 19 Oct 2014, 01:05 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/18/12
Posts: 10252
Post Likes: +8074
Company: Revolutionary Realty
Location: Coeurdalene, ID (KCOE)
Aircraft: 1954 Bonanza E35
Quote:
I've said it before (though we've all said all of this whole thread before) I think we are about to experience an enormous and unprecedented explosion in GA, almost unimaginable to us now, but commonly imagined in the era of the Jetson's etc. It will include drones, and pilotless passenger-carrying planes of all sizes.

I don' t think drones need an airport to take off & land from, unless you're talking about a large drone, military style.
I will never get on an airplane of any kind that is not flown by a human being. I doubt many people ever would.

Good luck with the "GA explosion", I wonder where the money would come from to fund it? Middle class family wants to fly; "sure, go to the airport, it's free". (Oh yeah, money doesn't count, just like how we need to "invest in infrastructure")

_________________
It's all a big conspiracy.....


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 22 Oct 2014, 06:20 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/30/12
Posts: 165
Post Likes: +21
Location: Los Angeles, CA (KVNY)
Aircraft: 1958 Bonanza J35
Username Protected wrote:
I'm not currently aware of any t.v. show, movie, or game that features general aviation in an incidental way,

Turn on a rap video.

Check out Instagram and FB.

Everyone wants their own airplane. It sells itself. It's good to want things. Makes you work harder.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: but they want Gulfstreams not Pistons!!!! :lol:
_________________
"My only Plane is a BO!!!!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 22 Oct 2014, 07:34 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Gulfstream is GA. Not sure how many times I have to say it. Are you concerned about GA or are you concerned about Pistons?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 22 Oct 2014, 07:47 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/09
Posts: 4166
Post Likes: +2990
Company: Craft Air Services, LLC
Location: Hertford, NC
Aircraft: D50A
I think he was joking the rappers who's only thought about aviation is that Soulja Boy has a G-V and so they should have one too.

_________________
Who is John Galt?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 22 Oct 2014, 22:51 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/22/08
Posts: 3109
Post Likes: +1067
Company: USAF Propulsion Laboratory
Location: Dayton, OH
Aircraft: PA24, AEST 680, 421
Username Protected wrote:
Either one of us, with a substantial investment, could start a company that could produce a small turboprop engine that would cost less than a piston engine. It's entirely doable. But you'll never see that from P&W or Honeywell - they're too comfortable.

If it was only that easy. All of the engine companies work hard to reduce costs, but we also want the engines to perform better use less fuel, last longer, etc. Lots of expensive materials, expensive manufacturing.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 22 Oct 2014, 22:54 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/22/08
Posts: 3109
Post Likes: +1067
Company: USAF Propulsion Laboratory
Location: Dayton, OH
Aircraft: PA24, AEST 680, 421
Username Protected wrote:
Or maybe this little contraption from Lockheed will one day be real. Then we'll all fly intercontinental jets virtually for free. Make sure you watch the little clip:

http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/Lockheed-Says-Its-Fusion-Reactor-Could-Power-Airplanes222910-1.html

Adam, this is awesome. The Air Force Labs have been rekindled interest in nuclear power. A result of our pivot to Asia, long ranges and high speed required. Most likely for unmanned aircraft though.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 22 Oct 2014, 23:07 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6652
Post Likes: +5963
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
Username Protected wrote:
the engine companies work hard to reduce costs, but we also want the engines to perform better use less fuel, last longer, etc. Lots of expensive materials, expensive manufacturing.


I just don't buy it. With todays 5-axis CNC machinery, I can't see a turbine have to cost any more than a piston. It's got a lot fewer parts and the tolerances this can be made to with CNC is staggering. Remember - when they were certified they had to be hand milled manually as there was no CNC then. Now a machine can churn them out 100 times faster and do them better.

Another example - I can buy aircraft grade certified turbo for about $3000. We can all agree that they are basically half of a turbine in construction. They both have a centrifugal compressor of about the same size, they both have bearings that need oiling and cooling. Sure the turbine has burner cans and an axial turbine stage, but that can't account for the $250K extra they charge for the thing. No way. Someone is making a lot of money along the way, that's all I'm saying. And as long a the military (which is yours and my money) is willing to pay any price for this stuff, there's no incentive from the old boys network to lower prices.

_________________
Without love, where would you be now?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 23 Oct 2014, 02:31 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/15/09
Posts: 1858
Post Likes: +1356
Location: Red Deer, Alberta (CRE5/CYQF)
Aircraft: M20E/Bell47
Username Protected wrote:
Or maybe this little contraption from Lockheed will one day be real. Then we'll all fly intercontinental jets virtually for free. Make sure you watch the little clip:

http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/Lockheed-Says-Its-Fusion-Reactor-Could-Power-Airplanes222910-1.html

Adam, this is awesome. The Air Force Labs have been rekindled interest in nuclear power. A result of our pivot to Asia, long ranges and high speed required. Most likely for unmanned aircraft though.

Fred/Adam,

I hate to say this because I really want this to be true but I am EXTREMELY skeptical.

My last Masters Degree was in plasma physics. Although I did my degree at University of Toronto, my research project was on one of the experiments at Princeton's TFTR (Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor) in the mid-1990's.

This would be such a huge leap in technology that in aviation terms it would be like somebody developing a Diesel engine, certifying it with the FAA, getting an STC for Aerostars within the next year...and then selling them to us installed for 10AMU.

I hope I am wrong.

Glenn

Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 23 Oct 2014, 02:51 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7097
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:
the engine companies work hard to reduce costs, but we also want the engines to perform better use less fuel, last longer, etc. Lots of expensive materials, expensive manufacturing.


I just don't buy it. With todays 5-axis CNC machinery, I can't see a turbine have to cost any more than a piston. It's got a lot fewer parts and the tolerances this can be made to with CNC is staggering. Remember - when they were certified they had to be hand milled manually as there was no CNC then. Now a machine can churn them out 100 times faster and do them better.

Another example - I can buy aircraft grade certified turbo for about $3000. We can all agree that they are basically half of a turbine in construction. They both have a centrifugal compressor of about the same size, they both have bearings that need oiling and cooling. Sure the turbine has burner cans and an axial turbine stage, but that can't account for the $250K extra they charge for the thing. No way. Someone is making a lot of money along the way, that's all I'm saying. And as long a the military (which is yours and my money) is willing to pay any price for this stuff, there's no incentive from the old boys network to lower prices.


No arguments from me.
_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 23 Oct 2014, 05:01 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
I just don't buy it. With todays 5-axis CNC machinery, I can't see a turbine have to cost any more than a piston. It's got a lot fewer parts and the tolerances this can be made to with CNC is staggering. Remember - when they were certified they had to be hand milled manually as there was no CNC then. Now a machine can churn them out 100 times faster and do them better.

Another example - I can buy aircraft grade certified turbo for about $3000. We can all agree that they are basically half of a turbine in construction. They both have a centrifugal compressor of about the same size, they both have bearings that need oiling and cooling. Sure the turbine has burner cans and an axial turbine stage, but that can't account for the $250K extra they charge for the thing. No way. Someone is making a lot of money along the way, that's all I'm saying. And as long a the military (which is yours and my money) is willing to pay any price for this stuff, there's no incentive from the old boys network to lower prices.

Sounds like an opportunity to start an engine company.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 23 Oct 2014, 12:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/04/14
Posts: 3440
Post Likes: +2948
Location: Boonton Twp, NJ
Aircraft: B757/767
I'd be interested in doing some work on such a project. The hot side is a bit more material critical on a turbine vice turbocharger. Higher temps.

I did build a functional jet out of a turbocharger in high school and worked at Pratt & Whitney in college. I have some engine experience. FYI, most turbine blades are cast, not milled. It's not the finish machining that's stupid expensive, it's the materials.

I don't think piston engine costs can be matched, but I think the piston to turbine delta can be dramatically reduced.

_________________
ATP-AMEL Comm- ASEL Helicopter
CFI/II-H MEI/II
A320 B737 B757 B767 BE300 S-70
B767 Requal 04/24


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 268 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next



PWI, Inc. (Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.tempest.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.