19 Nov 2025, 13:36 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing Posted: 18 Oct 2014, 21:56 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/14/08 Posts: 3133 Post Likes: +2674 Location: KGBR
Aircraft: D50
|
|
Username Protected wrote: They had new paint, new interior, modern avionics, and low time motors? 1978 Duke 300 SMOH both sides (good shop) and recently done, 3 year old paint, 3 year old leather interior, rebuilt autopilot, winglets, extended fuel, NDH, $60k. Needed $40k spent on the panel to make it pristine. So, $100k for a beautiful low time Duke with modern panel Bought many Colemill Barons with low to mid time engines for under $100k and an extremely nice 58P with a 100 hour engine and 1000 hour engine for $100k with good avionics. All these planes had full de-ice and radar as well. Plenty of twins out there for sale and there will be more. More people are flocking to experimentals and plastic planes with parachutes.
Uncle. Will you buy my next plane for me?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing Posted: 18 Oct 2014, 22:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/08 Posts: 12160 Post Likes: +3545
Aircraft: C55
|
|
No, but I will sell you one I missed the "Army" Tbone by $5k. That one was modern and nice, just needed some housekeeping. REALLY nice twins still bring good money, but they better be the latest version with all the goodies and look brand new. A local business man just spent $1.5M upgrading his C90B. It has new engines with every Raiseback option, G1000, custom interior, etc. He doesn't care about the cost. It sets next to his 2013 Citation Excel. Some people don't care about the cost.
_________________ The kid gets it all. Just plant us in the damn garden, next to the stupid lion.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing Posted: 19 Oct 2014, 01:05 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 06/18/12 Posts: 10252 Post Likes: +8074 Company: Revolutionary Realty Location: Coeurdalene, ID (KCOE)
Aircraft: 1954 Bonanza E35
|
|
Quote: I've said it before (though we've all said all of this whole thread before) I think we are about to experience an enormous and unprecedented explosion in GA, almost unimaginable to us now, but commonly imagined in the era of the Jetson's etc. It will include drones, and pilotless passenger-carrying planes of all sizes. I don' t think drones need an airport to take off & land from, unless you're talking about a large drone, military style. I will never get on an airplane of any kind that is not flown by a human being. I doubt many people ever would. Good luck with the "GA explosion", I wonder where the money would come from to fund it? Middle class family wants to fly; "sure, go to the airport, it's free". (Oh yeah, money doesn't count, just like how we need to "invest in infrastructure")
_________________ It's all a big conspiracy.....
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing Posted: 22 Oct 2014, 22:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/22/08 Posts: 3109 Post Likes: +1067 Company: USAF Propulsion Laboratory Location: Dayton, OH
Aircraft: PA24, AEST 680, 421
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Either one of us, with a substantial investment, could start a company that could produce a small turboprop engine that would cost less than a piston engine. It's entirely doable. But you'll never see that from P&W or Honeywell - they're too comfortable. If it was only that easy. All of the engine companies work hard to reduce costs, but we also want the engines to perform better use less fuel, last longer, etc. Lots of expensive materials, expensive manufacturing.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing Posted: 22 Oct 2014, 23:07 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6652 Post Likes: +5963 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: the engine companies work hard to reduce costs, but we also want the engines to perform better use less fuel, last longer, etc. Lots of expensive materials, expensive manufacturing. I just don't buy it. With todays 5-axis CNC machinery, I can't see a turbine have to cost any more than a piston. It's got a lot fewer parts and the tolerances this can be made to with CNC is staggering. Remember - when they were certified they had to be hand milled manually as there was no CNC then. Now a machine can churn them out 100 times faster and do them better. Another example - I can buy aircraft grade certified turbo for about $3000. We can all agree that they are basically half of a turbine in construction. They both have a centrifugal compressor of about the same size, they both have bearings that need oiling and cooling. Sure the turbine has burner cans and an axial turbine stage, but that can't account for the $250K extra they charge for the thing. No way. Someone is making a lot of money along the way, that's all I'm saying. And as long a the military (which is yours and my money) is willing to pay any price for this stuff, there's no incentive from the old boys network to lower prices.
_________________ Without love, where would you be now?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 02:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/15/09 Posts: 1858 Post Likes: +1356 Location: Red Deer, Alberta (CRE5/CYQF)
Aircraft: M20E/Bell47
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Or maybe this little contraption from Lockheed will one day be real. Then we'll all fly intercontinental jets virtually for free. Make sure you watch the little clip: http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/Lockheed-Says-Its-Fusion-Reactor-Could-Power-Airplanes222910-1.htmlAdam, this is awesome. The Air Force Labs have been rekindled interest in nuclear power. A result of our pivot to Asia, long ranges and high speed required. Most likely for unmanned aircraft though. Fred/Adam,
I hate to say this because I really want this to be true but I am EXTREMELY skeptical.
My last Masters Degree was in plasma physics. Although I did my degree at University of Toronto, my research project was on one of the experiments at Princeton's TFTR (Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor) in the mid-1990's.
This would be such a huge leap in technology that in aviation terms it would be like somebody developing a Diesel engine, certifying it with the FAA, getting an STC for Aerostars within the next year...and then selling them to us installed for 10AMU.
I hope I am wrong.
Glenn
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 02:51 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7097 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: the engine companies work hard to reduce costs, but we also want the engines to perform better use less fuel, last longer, etc. Lots of expensive materials, expensive manufacturing. I just don't buy it. With todays 5-axis CNC machinery, I can't see a turbine have to cost any more than a piston. It's got a lot fewer parts and the tolerances this can be made to with CNC is staggering. Remember - when they were certified they had to be hand milled manually as there was no CNC then. Now a machine can churn them out 100 times faster and do them better. Another example - I can buy aircraft grade certified turbo for about $3000. We can all agree that they are basically half of a turbine in construction. They both have a centrifugal compressor of about the same size, they both have bearings that need oiling and cooling. Sure the turbine has burner cans and an axial turbine stage, but that can't account for the $250K extra they charge for the thing. No way. Someone is making a lot of money along the way, that's all I'm saying. And as long a the military (which is yours and my money) is willing to pay any price for this stuff, there's no incentive from the old boys network to lower prices.
No arguments from me.
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 05:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I just don't buy it. With todays 5-axis CNC machinery, I can't see a turbine have to cost any more than a piston. It's got a lot fewer parts and the tolerances this can be made to with CNC is staggering. Remember - when they were certified they had to be hand milled manually as there was no CNC then. Now a machine can churn them out 100 times faster and do them better.
Another example - I can buy aircraft grade certified turbo for about $3000. We can all agree that they are basically half of a turbine in construction. They both have a centrifugal compressor of about the same size, they both have bearings that need oiling and cooling. Sure the turbine has burner cans and an axial turbine stage, but that can't account for the $250K extra they charge for the thing. No way. Someone is making a lot of money along the way, that's all I'm saying. And as long a the military (which is yours and my money) is willing to pay any price for this stuff, there's no incentive from the old boys network to lower prices. Sounds like an opportunity to start an engine company.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|