13 Jul 2025, 03:24 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 01:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20445 Post Likes: +25735 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: On a 2-3 hour flight figuring 65gph with an hour reserves I'm hearing topping off isn't the best option? I'd need 270 gallons max for that flight which would leave the tips half full for take off. Is this preferred rather than topping off? In turbines, fuel weight is much more significant than in pistons. In your airplane, almost 2,500 lbs. You don't want to carry around unneeded fuel if you don't have to. Less weight means higher performance, particularly OEI. So for any given leg, consider fueling to a safe amount but not topping off. This will be particularly important in the summer with your F model if you want reasonable OEI performance. Weight is a very strong factor under those conditions. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 01:26 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7426 Post Likes: +4886 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: On a 2-3 hour flight figuring 65gph with an hour reserves I'm hearing topping off isn't the best option? I'd need 270 gallons max for that flight which would leave the tips half full for take off. Is this preferred rather than topping off? With bigger fuel capacity aircraft, topping off makes less sense. I usually just load fuel needed plus a reasonable reserve. For my Solitaire (which burns a hair more than yours), I would plan 600 lbs first hour, 500 each subsequent hour, and 600 lbs reserve assuming no alternate and a near guarantee of getting in at destination, more reserve of course if alternate required or whatever. For example, I go KSQL-KTRK-KSQL a fair amount (36 minute each way). In VFR conditions I burn about 425 lbs each way (and fuel is much easier to do all at departure for the round trip). So I load just mains (154 gal = 1032 lbs) and outers (69 gal = 462 lbs) for 1494 lbs total. I use about 850 lbs, which leaves me between 600-700 lbs when I land back at home base. I get shorter takeoff, faster climb, faster cruise and shorter landing in addition to more payload than I can carry (if needed). No need to load up the extra 1200 lbs in the tips if I'm not going to use it. For a 2 hour flight, I would probably load mains + outers + either 15 or 30 gals in each tip. 15 is adequate (1695 lbs total), 30 (1896 lbs total) is a very healthy reserve. Part of my decision making would take fuel price into account if there's no operational reason to choose otherwise. Finally, there can be downsides to topping off - you can't land with full tips. So if you land with full tips for some reason, you are forced to have an overweight landing inspection before next flight. If you don't have that much in the tips in the first place, you can't make that landing overweight. Lots of reasons to only load the fuel you're going to need.
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 06:10 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/28/13 Posts: 6232 Post Likes: +4274 Location: Indiana
Aircraft: C195, D17S, M20TN
|
|
James, Congrats on the new bird. You will love it. I don't fly an MU2 but when I've transitioned to a new bird I've always erred on the high side with fuel. Particularly if weather at destination is a factor. Certainly in your case OEI performance is critical too so adjustment is necessary in fuel load. In our TBM I ways landed with 1.5+ hours of fuel my first year on every flight. Now with 500+ hours experience I still like 1 hour for VFR arrivals. If I was flying an MU2 and hot/high were an issue early in my experience bucket I might add a fuel stop vs extra fuel that robs OEI performance thus enabling mucho fuel when landing, in WX, at destination.... Of course I'm a fuel weenie. (More is better, almost always) ...
_________________ Chuck KEVV
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 10:16 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20445 Post Likes: +25735 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What's flying with tips half full like? It flies about 600 lbs lighter than tips full. Quote: I realize there are baffles but isn't the fuel movement noticable? I've never noticed any fuel sloshing effect in the handling of the plane. The tips don't actually have substantial baffles. It is mostly just an open tube inside. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 11:26 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7426 Post Likes: +4886 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What's flying with tips half full like? I realize there are baffles but isn't the fuel movement noticable? I've never noticed that. It's a little bit heavier in roll, but nothing dramatic. It rides better in turbulence just due to the weight.
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 15:09 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/23/08 Posts: 7357 Post Likes: +4088 Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx. Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What's flying with tips half full like? I realize there are baffles but isn't the fuel movement noticable? I mean honestly it really kinda handles like a truck... and with tips full it's even a little sluggisher and a bit more roll inertia I suppose. By the time you are down to 60G each tip its really indiscernible from empty-tips for the most part. I remember when we first got it and people said how unstable it was and that if you turned away it would be gone in a different direction haha. So far from the truth. Usually it was guys that "had a lot of time in them a few years ago".
_________________ Tom Johnson-Az/Wy AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com C: 602-628-2701
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 15:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/23/08 Posts: 7357 Post Likes: +4088 Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx. Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
|
|
Username Protected wrote: On a 2-3 hour flight figuring 65gph with an hour reserves I'm hearing topping off isn't the best option? I'd need 270 gallons max for that flight which would leave the tips half full for take off. Is this preferred rather than topping off? I try to manage my fuel real estate. We often just leave the outers full and only run through it once a month or so just to ease the refueling burden (Arizona). There are a bunch of fueling limitations to adhere to, but the 15G outer tanks are pretty low on my radar. So I will often run in Tip Manual mode, deplete the tips and land with 100G in the Main and 15G in each outer, then on refuel you can pretty quickly put 35G in just one of the Main tank openings, then put what you need in the tips and be gone. For a Full-Full mission, its both caps on the mains though to really top off.
_________________ Tom Johnson-Az/Wy AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com C: 602-628-2701
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 22 Jan 2016, 15:30 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7426 Post Likes: +4886 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So I will often run in Tip Manual mode, deplete the tips and land with 100G in the Main and 15G in each outer, then on refuel you can pretty quickly put 35G in just one of the Main tank openings, then put what you need in the tips and be gone. I find the cap difference in the mains is about 2/3-1/3. 2/3 of the fuel to fill the main goes in the first cap, 1/3 goes in the second. So if you need 60 gal to fill the main, the first cap will take about 40 and second cap about 20.
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 24 Jan 2016, 21:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/10 Posts: 1561 Post Likes: +1809 Company: D&M Leasing Houston Location: Katy, TX (KTME)
Aircraft: CitationV/C180
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Congratulations James. Welcome to the club. I am not a big believer in doing your initial in a sim, even though you will still have to put time in the plane. The MU2 flies so different from every other plane that I have ever flown. The controls are very heavy and being out of trim can almost make it un-flyable. You won't get that in the sim. If you haven't stroked that check to Simcom, I'd highly recommend Reece Howell's organization for your initial and then go to Simcom. Good Luck! Sandy, Thanks. This is the route I decided to go. Feb 1st!
Last edited on 25 Jan 2016, 23:08, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 25 Jan 2016, 20:59 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/21/14 Posts: 287 Post Likes: +88 Location: KPDK
Aircraft: C421B MU2-40 Solitai
|
|
Sandy,
Thanks. This is route I decided to go. Feb 1st![/quote]
I was just up there a few days ago, and Reece spent a few hours with me for a little refresher. You will not regret having Reece or Jerry teaching you. Not only will you get fabulous training, but you will develop friendships that will last a lifetime.
Enjoy Sandy
_________________ Sandy
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 26 Jan 2016, 12:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/10/10 Posts: 676 Post Likes: +490
Aircraft: C441 Conquest II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Sandy,
Thanks. This is route I decided to go. Feb 1st! I was just up there a few days ago, and Reece spent a few hours with me for a little refresher. You will not regret having Reece or Jerry teaching you. Not only will you get fabulous training, but you will develop friendships that will last a lifetime. Enjoy Sandy[/quote] +1 The support of the MU-2 community is incredible. All of the instructors are equally great and friendship really is the norm...
Last edited on 26 Jan 2016, 12:12, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 26 Jan 2016, 12:12 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/10/10 Posts: 676 Post Likes: +490
Aircraft: C441 Conquest II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I was just up there a few days ago, and Reece spent a few hours with me for a little refresher. You will not regret having Reece or Jerry teaching you. Not only will you get fabulous training, but you will develop friendships that will last a lifetime.
Enjoy Sandy +1 The support of the MU-2 community is incredible. All of the instructors are equally great and friendship really is the norm...
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 26 Jan 2016, 12:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20445 Post Likes: +25735 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You are stuttering Dave. ;) Normal withdrawal symptoms. Only known cure is burning Jet-A again... Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|