01 Jul 2025, 22:18 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 11 Dec 2015, 10:16 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20395 Post Likes: +25585 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Engines designed to come out in an hour are generally a couple cannon plugs and reinsertion of a couple clevis pins.
Not 100% sure on the Mu-2, but on the E-2 it was connect three electrical cannon plugs, four hydraulic lines, two fuel lines and the three phases off the generator.
I suspect that the Mu is similar or even simpler. Yes it is, no hydraulics, one canon plug. All the electrical connections to the engine, except the heavy starter/generator lines, come through it. Mike C. Attachment: mu2-canon-plug.jpg
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 11 Dec 2015, 10:22 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/04/14 Posts: 3407 Post Likes: +2874 Location: Boonton Twp, NJ
Aircraft: B757/767
|
|
Think of it like a tractor trailer.
To work on the rear of the truck, you lower the landing gear, disconnect two air brake lines, one electric plug, and possibly a couple hydraulic lines. Pull the coupling release, drive truck out from under trailer.
When truck fixed, just back it under and reconnect lines. It's that simple.
New truck under trailer may require some minor height adjustments on the trailer landing gear, but as long as it's the same truck, it just goes back together.
In the case of quick change turbine engines, open or remove cowl, disconnect the cables and wire harnesses, fuel lines and other connections, attach crane or cradle, pull bolts, engine is out.
That simple.
_________________ ATP-AMEL Comm- ASEL Helicopter CFI/II-H MEI/II A320 B737 B757 B767 BE300 S-70 B767 Requal 04/24
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 11 Dec 2015, 10:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/19/09 Posts: 383 Post Likes: +168 Location: Montego Bay, Jamaica W.I. (MKJS)
Aircraft: Baron B55/Cessna 140
|
|
Vince, Sorry, I didn't clarify one usually only pulls an outter wing for a leaking 15 gal tank. It's 9 connections : Wing Cannon Plug, Fire Loop, Oil Cooler/ Torq Trans Line , Bleed air, Fuel, Gen Brush Block ,P/L and Emergency stop; followed by the 3 bolts that hold the engine to the frame. Btw none of those bolts are torqued, only castleated nut and cotter pinned. As stated before takes under 20 mins to remove or install one. Mike beat me to a response with pics on the connections ! Regards, Nigel
Last edited on 11 Dec 2015, 10:39, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 11 Dec 2015, 10:33 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20395 Post Likes: +25585 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Mechanical connections, but easily disconnected with no change in the adjustment when reconnected. Two pushrods, here shown disconnected with loose ends circled in red. One is condition lever (upper one, I think), other is power lever. Takes ~2 minutes to disconnect, 4 minutes to reconnect (safety wire the nut). Length of pushrod remains fixed so rigging is retained. The blue circled things are, left to right, canon plug, starter/generator heavy lugs, and bleed air tap. Not shown are two oil lines (to oil cooler) and one fuel line on the top of the engine. The yellow circled items are the 3 pins that hold the engine to the airframe. That's it to remove an engine on an MU2. I flew in one afternoon, engine removed, adjustment made, engine back in, ground run check, flew out. Total elapsed time 2 hours. Mike C.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 17 Dec 2015, 20:09 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5210 Post Likes: +5226
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Joined CAA and got my temporary membership. Was told by friend of mine that $2.35 Jet A around here is not uncommon!! Even at 65 GPH, that's pretty cheap!! WACO is my favorite out there for CAA
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 17 Dec 2015, 23:19 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20395 Post Likes: +25585 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Was told by friend of mine that $2.35 Jet A around here is not uncommon!! Even at 65 GPH, that's pretty cheap!! Starting to see some prices under $2. For example, KACT, $1.79. Welcome to the world of contract fuel. Get Everest if you only get one other card. CAA just doesn't do enough airports to be your only card. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 30 Dec 2015, 16:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20395 Post Likes: +25585 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The fuel nozzles were in rough shape and in some cases were out specs by as much as 75%. Bore scope of burner can revealed no indication of damage and the SOAP samples came back NORMAL. That's fortunate. Fuel nozzle condition can ruin an engine if it gets really bad. There is some margin in the TPE331 design, so it can tolerate some of this. The larger engine shops will show you first T wheels with nozzle streaking damage. Looks like a mouse ate holes in the blades. Quote: They think the engines will run better and make more power with the fuel nozzles overhauled. It very likely will. More even and complete fuel burn makes the engine run better. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The verdict is in.....MU-2 Posted: 30 Dec 2015, 16:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/29/09 Posts: 4166 Post Likes: +2987 Company: Craft Air Services, LLC Location: Hertford, NC
Aircraft: D50A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The fuel nozzles were in rough shape and in some cases were out specs by as much as 75%. Bore scope of burner can revealed no indication of damage and the SOAP samples came back NORMAL. That's fortunate. Fuel nozzle condition can ruin an engine if it gets really bad. There is some margin in the TPE331 design, so it can tolerate some of this. The larger engine shops will show you first T wheels with nozzle streaking damage. Looks like a mouse ate holes in the blades. Quote: They think the engines will run better and make more power with the fuel nozzles overhauled. It very likely will. More even and complete fuel burn makes the engine run better. Mike C.
I'd put my money on "won't be able to tell the difference".
_________________ Who is John Galt?
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|