An NTSB report, like a police auto accident report is admissible to show the facts. For example, the NTSB report detailing how the fuel imbalance happened in this case is admissible. What is not admissible, is the conclusion about fault. This follows the same rule as an auto accident case. The accident investigator's report cannot be admitted to show fault. That decision is the sole province of the jury. This preserves the work of the NTSB for litigants to use in court if need be while protecting and encouraging the participants to be honest. It leads to greater overall safety. That's why I say I'll be interested to see what the widow's experts have to say about the pilot's conduct.

Alan Bradley

And why does Montana law matter here? Simply because that's where the wreckage fell?

Montana was where the suit was filed, but you're right, Scott, the court in MT can apply the law of another state if it has more significant contacts with the litigants, aircraft, etc.

And why does Montana law matter here? Simply because that's where the wreckage fell?