20 Jun 2025, 10:39 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Is a Cessna 140 a Good Entry Level Plane? Posted: 15 Jun 2025, 21:21 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/10/24 Posts: 9 Post Likes: +2
Aircraft: M20J
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Thanks guys. I am 5’11 and 180lbs. Never sat in a 140 before and have zero taildragger time. I like the way they look and it’s one of the few planes I would consider in my budget. At least according to a good rule of thumb I read on BT before. I'm 6'1 and leg room as not been an issue. They are a lot of fun to fly, I really wish I had access to a taildragger.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Is a Cessna 140 a Good Entry Level Plane? Posted: 15 Jun 2025, 21:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/18/11 Posts: 1101 Post Likes: +652
Aircraft: Seabee Aerostar 700
|
|
my two bits, while tail dragger is fun to fly etc get a tricycle gear like the 150 or 172 or a piper. they will be much easier to insure and are very simple.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Is a Cessna 140 a Good Entry Level Plane? Posted: 15 Jun 2025, 23:14 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/04/10 Posts: 1586 Post Likes: +2909 Company: Northern Aviation, LLC
Aircraft: C45H, Aerostar, T28B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Is a C140 a good plane for a first time owner who just wants to fly VFR and fly to local airports? Or are they getting too old and difficult to maintain? Trying to get some preliminary information on them. Is the 140 a good airplane? Yes, no question. Is one right for you? That's a bit harder to answer. If a C140 would be a good fit is dependent on a lot of things, mainly about the pilot. They didn't move from the C140 to the tricycle C150 for no reason, taildraggers simply got wrecked too often. Especially in the hands of a novice pilot. Your flying background and age being top of the list of things to consider. Young pilot with quick reflexes, no problem. Old person with little to no flying experience and the little taildragger will be more exasperation than exhilaration. Closing in on a half century of flying these little planes one thing I know for sure, I would hate to try and do the things with a plane today I did when I was a kid. The reflexes, memory, and energy simply are no longer there. Jeff
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Is a Cessna 140 a Good Entry Level Plane? Posted: 16 Jun 2025, 06:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/11/10 Posts: 13081 Post Likes: +12735 Location: Indiana
Aircraft: Cessna 185, RV-7
|
|
C-140 is a gateway drug. It'll lead you one way, into Super Cubs and Huskies, or another, into Skywagons and Maules. Be careful! 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Is a Cessna 140 a Good Entry Level Plane? Posted: 16 Jun 2025, 10:02 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20357 Post Likes: +25527 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Get a C170. Worth the extra cost, IMO. My first 480 hours: Attachment: n1909c-in-flight.png To be fair, that had the 180 HP CS prop conversion, so a premium 170. The stock Continental C145 engine is decent, though. C140s can be had with wheel extensions that move the wheels further forward. Attachment: c140-wheel-extenders.png My brother's C140 had them. They put more weight on the tail and reduce the tendency for a nose over. The downsides are bouncier landings and can set up wiggle modes on the gear, plus makes it hard on the tailwheel. My brother took them off and the plane flew better without them. if you nose a C140 over, you really had to do things wrong, extenders or not. Mike C.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Is a Cessna 140 a Good Entry Level Plane? Posted: 16 Jun 2025, 10:24 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/18/11 Posts: 1101 Post Likes: +652
Aircraft: Seabee Aerostar 700
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Thanks guys. I am 5’11 and 180lbs. Never sat in a 140 before and have zero taildragger time. I like the way they look and it’s one of the few planes I would consider in my budget. At least according to a good rule of thumb I read on BT before. Purchase cost is not the major factor I would consider if I was tight on money. many times the more expensive well maintained aircraft will be cheaper over the long run. secondly buy an aircraft that is very common and has easy parts support. maintenance many times is more expensive than the initial cost. good local maintenance also helps control costs.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Is a Cessna 140 a Good Entry Level Plane? Posted: 16 Jun 2025, 11:27 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/23/15 Posts: 55 Post Likes: +76 Location: West Bend, WI (KETB)
Aircraft: Cessna 170A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: C-140 is a gateway drug. It'll lead you one way, into Super Cubs and Huskies, or another, into Skywagons and Maules. Be careful!  Agree on it being a gateway drug. I have a 170 and love it. I started longing for something higher, faster, farther, bigger. But then realized that no matter what I'd get next, there is always going to be the desire for more. So I'm going the other way. Something cheap and small that will fit into the hangar alongside the 170. For those days I just want to get away and in touch with the sky. Gateway drug indeed.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Is a Cessna 140 a Good Entry Level Plane? Posted: 16 Jun 2025, 17:42 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/26/18 Posts: 147 Post Likes: +64
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Thanks guys. I am 5’11 and 180lbs. Never sat in a 140 before and have zero taildragger time. I like the way they look and it’s one of the few planes I would consider in my budget. At least according to a good rule of thumb I read on BT before. Purchase cost is not the major factor I would consider if I was tight on money. many times the more expensive well maintained aircraft will be cheaper over the long run. secondly buy an aircraft that is very common and has easy parts support. maintenance many times is more expensive than the initial cost. good local maintenance also helps control costs. I have considered operating costs when it comes to choosing a plane. Isn't a 140 pretty cheap to operate compared to, say, a Bo or similar? Some of the ones listed for sale even have the auto gas STC.
I'm pretty inexperienced with some of this, thanks for the advice.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Is a Cessna 140 a Good Entry Level Plane? Posted: 16 Jun 2025, 21:08 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/22/19 Posts: 1099 Post Likes: +856 Location: KPMP
Aircraft: PA23-250
|
|
They are prone to corrosion, cracks in the tail structure, water in the fuel system, and the engines can lose oil pump prime due to worn accessory cases.
The cabin is tiny, the climb rate is abysmal, they are exceedingly slow in cruise.
Other than that, they're fine.
_________________ A&P/IA/CFI/avionics tech KPMP Cirrus aircraft expert
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Is a Cessna 140 a Good Entry Level Plane? Posted: 16 Jun 2025, 22:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/06/10 Posts: 1481 Post Likes: +804 Location: KMBO Brandon, MS
|
|
Username Protected wrote: C-140 is a gateway drug. It'll lead you one way, into Super Cubs and Huskies, or another, into Skywagons and Maules. Be careful!  Agree on it being a gateway drug. I have a 170 and love it. I started longing for something higher, faster, farther, bigger. But then realized that no matter what I'd get next, there is always going to be the desire for more. So I'm going the other way. Something cheap and small that will fit into the hangar alongside the 170. For those days I just want to get away and in touch with the sky. Gateway drug indeed.
Must agree with both of these posts. I started with a C120, then a C140, then a C170B. Skipped C180/185 and 190/195; went straight on to an S35. 140 was probably the most fun and cheapest to own. Everything in aviation is a trade off. That being said, my choice for practicality and biggest bang for the buck would be the C170B. However, in last few years, the popularity for back country airplanes seems to have driven the prices of 170’s to insanely high levels. Still, you can’t go wrong with a good C140 or 140A, if you can find one. Good luck with whatever you choose.
MM
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Is a Cessna 140 a Good Entry Level Plane? Posted: 16 Jun 2025, 23:33 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/18/21 Posts: 401 Post Likes: +339
|
|
I had a 170B with the Avcon 180hp/constant speed conversion. It was almost the perfect airplane, and if you told me I could only own one airplane for the rest of my life it would be a strong contender.
However, as others have mentioned 170 prices have gone through the roof! A good 140 can likely be had for half of a 170.
All these airplanes are approaching 75 years old. Corrosion, cracks, etc.... There are no cream puffs anymore. However fundamentally they are simple, strong planes so if you find one that has been kept up and doesn't have any show stopper cracks or corrosion they aren't any harder to keep up than a 70's ere 150 or 172.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|