24 Oct 2025, 13:15 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Building a Kitfox STI, lots of ?'s Posted: 07 Apr 2025, 08:26 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 16865 Post Likes: +28619 Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
Hi Charlie, I'm not familiar with the kitfox wing, but you got me curious if they still did glue-only, considering that their gross weight on newer models is a heck of a lot more than those early versions. I stumbled across this video which seems to indicate they adopted rib stitching at some point https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ogk8YFzoA6E
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Building a Kitfox STI, lots of ?'s Posted: 07 Apr 2025, 09:13 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/16/17 Posts: 869 Post Likes: +944 Location: KYIP Willow Run (Detroit MI)
Aircraft: BE58/7AC/C140
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm a fan of the stewart system.
The glue has already been mentioned. It is easy to work with and re-positionable for awhile with heat. It doesn't smell, and doesn't make ridges that have to be ironed out.
When you get to the coatings they are all water-based. The UV block is charcoal-based. You can brush it on and then lightly sand. Stewart topcoats are also water based. Or, in an experimental you can paint with pretty much anything else you want after the charcoal.
All the components are non-metallic and you can bury com/nav/gps antennae inside the structure with no reception issues.
I have covered ailerons and flaps in my basement with my wife and kids in the house and there was no smell, no complaints. Try that with any of the other (non-oratex) systems. I’m also a fan of the Stewart System. I covered my Champ with it, it’s very easy to work with, (at least until you get to the topcoat), I'm a complete amateur and I think it turned out pretty well.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Building a Kitfox STI, lots of ?'s Posted: 07 Apr 2025, 09:34 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/22/12 Posts: 893 Post Likes: +367 Location: Denver, CO
Aircraft: 1969 TN 36
|
|
From what I know so far they do do rib stitching or at least the builds that I have started reading on the kitfox forum. Charlie, your right I'm going to need a serious plan for this year at OSH and all of the vendors and demonstrations that we are going to want to attend. We just got the notification from Kitfox that we need to confirm our order.. Roughly 2.5 months to things get real. Username Protected wrote: Hi Charlie, I'm not familiar with the kitfox wing, but you got me curious if they still did glue-only, considering that their gross weight on newer models is a heck of a lot more than those early versions. I stumbled across this video which seems to indicate they adopted rib stitching at some point https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ogk8YFzoA6E
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Building a Kitfox STI, lots of ?'s Posted: 07 Apr 2025, 15:36 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/24/19 Posts: 1492 Post Likes: +2103 Location: Ontario, Canada
Aircraft: Glasair Sportsman
|
|
|
Some thoughts to share, in line with your original text. Using italics to make my comments visible (hope this doesn't anger any other readers).
A partner and I Placed the Order for a Kitfox STI last week. (Primary factor in the choice of the kitfox was the ability to fold the wings which allows it to fit in my existing hangar. For those wondering) Due to "Efficiency gains" they'll be able to deliver it this June. Things just got real, fast and you can't imagine how excited we are though feeling a little rushed on the decisions we are facing. We originally were told they were out ~16 months so figured we had tons of time to figure out the small things when ordering the kit right up to engine choices.
Curious if anyone on here has built one? I just started digging in on the kitfox forum and there is a wealth of knowledge but since I'm on here I'd figure I'd ask. My next door neighbor is building one of these, plus I've been involved in several STI's and non-STI's from an inspection perspective.
In no order some of the questions we are thinking about.
Engine: Most likely the rotax 915 but the 916 is enticing but is it worth the extra $10k? We live in Colorado so a turbo is happening one way or another. We have looked at the Edge option but not sure I love the idea of boosting up a 912 to the levels they are without the other upgrades a 915 brings. Neighbor went with the 916 - keep in mind you have to order the FWF kit pretty early, so you will be under pressure to nail down this engine decision. FWF kit is a pretty long lead item.
Covering: Oratex. Damn it's expensive, but not having to paint the plane is appealing. Any experience here. I've seen both Oratex and Stewart on an STI. Ultimately the Stewart looked quite a bit brighter with better colour saturation, better shine.
Struts: Is it really worth over $3k to upgrade to the chromoly streamlined struts. This thing is not built to go fast. I've got the a36 for that. Yup, this one truly is a no-brainer. The standard struts plus their flimsy plastic aerodynamic covers are, well, unbecoming of an airplane in which you'll have well north of a hundred grand invested.
Autopilot: We are going to put in at least a two axis but the more I read it's probably worth at least paying for the 3rd axis mounting kit. thoughts? Provision the mount, then keep surveying those who are actually FLYING to see if they are getting any value from the third axis. From what I've seen so far it's a 50/50 proposition but I may not have sufficient data points in my sample.
Tires: My biggest concern from what I hear is the big Alaskan bush tires wear a lot on pavement. Both of us are new to a tail wheel and I figure for at least the first year a bunch of our time will be on pavement and the plane will be based at a paved field with no grass options. I'm thinking of starting with a more traditional tire at least as first and making the transition to a bigger alaskan bush tire later. Look at the cost of purchasing via the OEM kit vs aftermarket. I know one builder who opted to buy the big ABW's "for the future" as well as the standard tires because the kitted price saved a few hundred bucks over the cost of buying the ABWs later. Personally, if both owners are low T/W time pilots there is a huge advantage to going with the standard tires for time building. The ABWs take some getting used to, plus they do make it a bit more sporting to get in and out of the cockpit.
Interested to hear your opinions.
Additional thoughts... Congratulations on taking this plunge. As has been mentioned by others, eat this elephant one bite at a time, but most importantly, enjoy each bite!
You will find there are some very common kit quality issues. The vertical stab is often not vertical - it's not a good feeling to put pressure on it to bend it back to vertical but that's the only way to fix it. There are challenges with some of the welded-on bolt mounting tubes - they are sometimes contaminated with weld - spend the bucks to get the right reamers to clear those holes before you get frustrated and destroy a bunch of bolts. Also, the glued up wing and tail surfaces really do look pretty and you will hesitate to cover them up if you are somebody who enjoys the look of wood. It would be nice to have a clear covering option! You want to ensure you have all the right materials to allow complete touch-up of all blemishes in the paint applied to the steel tubing.
Oh, one last thought... You may not want to be in a hurry to buy your tailwheel as it seems this is an area where innovation and improvement of existing tailwheel mounts is happening quite quickly.
Wishing you the best of luck with your build.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Building a Kitfox STI, lots of ?'s Posted: 07 Apr 2025, 15:59 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/26/15 Posts: 10017 Post Likes: +9996 Company: airlines (*CRJ,A320) Location: Florida panhandle
Aircraft: Travel Air,T-6B,etc*
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I always worried about the myself and passenger weight hanging in the fiberglass seat pan over top of the elevator and aileron pushrods. The only thing holding the weight was zip ties around the tubes at front and back of the seat pans. If they popped all controls would be jammed with no way to lift yourself off and possibly not at neutral either. On this point there was somebody on one of the old forums (might have been Matronics or might have been Team Kitfox) who had a hard landing that collapsed his seat pan into the control tubes, which jammed them, and led to the second touchdown being even worse than the first. After that, there was a lot of discussion about fitting what you might describe as a ratchet strap, minus the ratchet hardware, as kind of a sling support underneath each seat well. The solution is obvious when you see pictures of how some builders have implemented it- basically bond the strap onto itself with rubber cement (i.e. polytak or big box store aviation supply aisle), weighs very little, and costs very little (up front and maintenance/inspection). Quote: Hopefully the later airplanes changed this setup. As far as the popular support strap, I don't remember if the factory brought out anything similar or some other solution. I also don't remember if the hard landing in question was one of the early airplanes (1-4) or the later, bigger ones (5 and up). The later ones were purportedly engineered to Part 23 standards in anticipation of Light Sport Aircraft (think early 2000s when the details were still getting hashed out) and possibly building turnkey factory airplanes. If you follow that to its logical conclusion, then the seat ought to hold up in a 9G impact (or 26G?) x170lbs x2 people, but I suspect that the sales literature and airshow booth talk was probably more along the lines of soft language, like meeting Part 23 in many areas. And I don't recall any talk of sandbag testing the seat pans to failure... that's a lot of bags of lead shot to stack in there!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Building a Kitfox STI, lots of ?'s Posted: 12 Jul 2025, 22:32 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/22/12 Posts: 893 Post Likes: +367 Location: Denver, CO
Aircraft: 1969 TN 36
|
|
|
It's here. We just got the kit this afternoon. I'm building it with my father in law and a good friend. Beyond excited to get this started..
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Building a Kitfox STI, lots of ?'s Posted: 13 Jul 2025, 08:17 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/10/17 Posts: 2392 Post Likes: +1784 Company: Skyhaven Airport Inc
Aircraft: various mid century
|
|
|
Excellent! It is just one step of the build manual at a time and you'll get it done! Lots of support groups and How To information to help if you get stuck.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Building a Kitfox STI, lots of ?'s Posted: 13 Jul 2025, 14:55 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/22/12 Posts: 893 Post Likes: +367 Location: Denver, CO
Aircraft: 1969 TN 36
|
|
|
We just got through the inventory process. They do an amazing job of labeling and bagging up all of the nuts and bolts which are then boxed/grouped by the area of the plane they are for. Out of everything that was shipped we are missing 1 bag that has two AN bolts. I'd say thats pretty damn good considering the amount of stuff. Now the fun stuff starts.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Building a Kitfox STI, lots of ?'s Posted: 13 Jul 2025, 15:37 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/11/09 Posts: 6153 Post Likes: +5479 Company: Middle of the country company Location: Tulsa, Ok
Aircraft: Rebooting.......
|
|
|
Looking forward to following along this one. Browsed their site again last night, and that looks like something I could actually put together, and more importantly, STORE, in my shop at home!
_________________ Three things tell the truth: Little kids Drunks Yoga pants
Actually, four things..... Cycling kit..
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Building a Kitfox STI, lots of ?'s Posted: 13 Jul 2025, 17:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/10/17 Posts: 2392 Post Likes: +1784 Company: Skyhaven Airport Inc
Aircraft: various mid century
|
|
|
Just remember to install the small struts from the tail to the wing strut attach area when the wings are folded.
We had a Local buy a Kitfox in FL and trailer it up to PA. He folded and tied the wings together and padded the ailerons to the vertical fin.
But he forgot the short struts!
When he opened up the trailer in PA the fuselage was buckled behind the rear removable turtledeck cover. Both upper longerons kinked.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Building a Kitfox STI, lots of ?'s Posted: 27 Sep 2025, 13:32 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/22/12 Posts: 893 Post Likes: +367 Location: Denver, CO
Aircraft: 1969 TN 36
|
|
|
I posted this over on the kitfox forum but given the low traffic I figured I'd throw it up over here as well.
What I have on order. Garmin G3X Touch Garmin GTX 45R if I'm looking. GMC 507 and 3 servos, GTR205x Comm. GEA 24B for engine monitor VPX power supply Obviously have all of the connectors, AHRS,Magnetometer, etc.
Engine will be either a 915/916
I've been reading the various install manuals and starting to feel more comfortable with the process but still have a bunch of random questions I'd love an opinion on. I'm putting in the Wheelen microburst Nav/Strobe lights. Should I be running a 4 wire shielded for this? There is a Ground/ Nav pwr / Strob pwr / Sync. Do I need it to be shielded
On alot of the attachments I see a call to "aircraft" ground. Am I running a ground wire all the way back to a common ground bus that is then tied to the firewall or am I finding a way to ground it to the airframe closer to the actual box I'm wiring up?
OAT Temp prob. I know I need this out of the sun, exhaust stream etc. Are we just putting it under the wing?
Wing routing of Pitot/AOA / Wires through the rear spar at the pivot point or near there I was thinking about putting a discount on all of the wires. We will be folding the wings all the time (fits in my existing Hangar that way). Worth doing this or just adding in a point of failure.
On the Garmin wiring diagram for the Servo's when looking at power for them. I want to confirm that I route power from the GMC 507 to the roll servo and then it looks like from there directly to the Pitch servo. Both on the same breaker I think. Then it looks like the Yaw is on it's own breaker and not connected to the 507, when looking at power only. CAN bus everything is tied together. Page 24-10 of the G3x install manual.
Appreciate any guidance you guys can give.
Matt
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
Last edited on 27 Sep 2025, 16:04, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Building a Kitfox STI, lots of ?'s Posted: 27 Sep 2025, 13:47 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/16/15 Posts: 89 Post Likes: +43
Aircraft: C182, C172K, 7ECA
|
|
|
My $0.02 because this is a public forum, but IMHO Poly-Coat is a lot easier to repair down the road as you put holes in the underside of the horizontal, or someone gets squirrely and takes out a taxi light, etc. Stewart System is nicer and water based, but it is a bear to repair. Never done Oratez, it seems more expensive. I'm getting ready to recover a Citabria and I will use Poly-Coat products, and a respirator. I hope to use it for tailwheel training, so I expect to have some repairs down the road.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Building a Kitfox STI, lots of ?'s Posted: 27 Sep 2025, 16:03 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/22/12 Posts: 893 Post Likes: +367 Location: Denver, CO
Aircraft: 1969 TN 36
|
|
|
Decided on Polyfiber. Oratex, we didn't love the color choices and the $$ for it sealed the deal. I might regret that decision after the painting process but time will tell. Hopefully, we'll be painting by Jan.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Building a Kitfox STI, lots of ?'s Posted: 27 Sep 2025, 18:24 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/10/17 Posts: 2392 Post Likes: +1784 Company: Skyhaven Airport Inc
Aircraft: various mid century
|
|
If you're just going through Polytone it is really easy to spray. Aerothane is not too hard to spray either but definitely use a forced air hood and suit. The main thing is find out what temperature other builders are shrinking the fabric to. The manual says always to 350 but it seems like the fabric shrinks harder than years ago and 102 weight fabric will definitely deform the fuselage structure of a Cub at full shrink if you cover it blanket method and do a good job laying it out so the fabric fits well. Also use a modern digital iron. I tried clothes irons and could not get them to hold a consistent temp. I really like using this one. https://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/ ... gLqNPD_BwECut and trim every cut from the first fabric install to be like you would see it. Then when done there is minimal work to do and it all lays down nicely. Spend the time ironing and have one of the poly fiber teflon sheets to use to iron any lumps or marks on the polybrush.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|