banner
banner

02 Dec 2025, 14:35 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2019, 11:31 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/28/13
Posts: 6311
Post Likes: +4393
Location: Indiana
Aircraft: C195, D17S, M20TN
In the 180/185 if you’re look8ng for speed, Snyder would tell you one secret is a larger and heavier tail wheel. It is out of the airflow in cruise and being heavier and further aft helps CG. Shhh don’t tell everyone. :coffee:

_________________
Chuck
KEVV


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2019, 12:17 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/16/14
Posts: 9940
Post Likes: +14378
Company: Retired UA Steamfitter
Location: Colfax Washington
Aircraft: 1947 Bonanza 35
Username Protected wrote:
I get 130-135 KTAS burning 12.5 gph LOP in my 185 with 8.50’s. Maybe I’m doing something wrong?

Yes You Did Do Something Wrong :bat: You Sold a Beautiful Bonanza :bugeye:
You should have Kept it! :peace:
Your Pal that Sold You that Ass Kickin 185, has Three Planes :eek:
You couldn't own Two? :bugeye: :tongue: :duck: :lol:
Fly On Young Man :pilot: :thumbup: :D and Happy New Year! :cheers: :D

_________________
Welder/Pipefitter.......Forever a Student Pilot


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2019, 16:01 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/11/10
Posts: 13400
Post Likes: +13234
Location: Indiana
Aircraft: Cessna 185, RV-7
Username Protected wrote:
I get 130-135 KTAS burning 12.5 gph LOP in my 185 with 8.50’s. Maybe I’m doing something wrong?

Yes You Did Do Something Wrong :bat: You Sold a Beautiful Bonanza :bugeye:
You should have Kept it! :peace:
Your Pal that Sold You that Ass Kickin 185, has Three Planes :eek:
You couldn't own Two? :bugeye: :tongue: :duck: :lol:
Fly On Young Man :pilot: :thumbup: :D and Happy New Year! :cheers: :D

You’re right. I think that guy who sold me the 185 kept a few knots for himself.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2019, 16:41 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/04/10
Posts: 1592
Post Likes: +2925
Company: Northern Aviation, LLC
Aircraft: C45H, Aerostar, T28B
Username Protected wrote:
I get 130-135 KTAS burning 12.5 gph...


Stuart,

That sounds about right, around 12 GPH is about what I figured when flying my dad's 180 and on wheels and it went about that fast; on Edo 2870's it was more like 110kts. Considering the 180/185 are the same airframe I would expect a 520 or 550 pulled back to 180 fuel flows would achieve 180 speeds as well.

Jeff


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2019, 19:15 
Online



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/13/09
Posts: 5054
Post Likes: +6642
Location: Nirvana
Aircraft: OPAs
Username Protected wrote:
I get 130-135 KTAS burning 12.5 gph LOP in my 185 with 8.50’s. Maybe I’m doing something wrong?



Only thing you're doing wrong is being honest....

_________________
"Most of my money I spent on airplanes. The rest I just wasted....."
---the EFI, POF-----


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2019, 19:20 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/04/10
Posts: 1592
Post Likes: +2925
Company: Northern Aviation, LLC
Aircraft: C45H, Aerostar, T28B
Quote:
Only thing you're doing wrong is being honest....


:lol: :lol:
One of the first things I discovered was all my airplanes were heavier, slower, burned more fuel, and worth less than everyone else's. :roll: :roll:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2019, 20:26 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/25/11
Posts: 9015
Post Likes: +17225
Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
Username Protected wrote:
Quote:
Only thing you're doing wrong is being honest....


:lol: :lol:
One of the first things I discovered was all my airplanes were heavier, slower, burned more fuel, and worth less than everyone else's. :roll: :roll:


Ah, the Plato of BT wisdom. :peace:

Jg

_________________
Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 01 Jan 2019, 20:47 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/29/10
Posts: 5660
Post Likes: +4882
Company: USAF Simulator Instructor
Location: Wichita Valley Airport (F14)
Aircraft: Bonanza G35
You can say anything you want in the bar or on BT as long as you’re honest when you flight plan.

_________________
FTFA RTFM


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2019, 09:57 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/31/17
Posts: 1800
Post Likes: +721
Aircraft: C180
Username Protected wrote:
I get 130-135 KTAS burning 12.5 gph LOP in my 185 with 8.50’s. Maybe I’m doing something wrong?


Nothing as far as I can tell after 5 years and several hundred hours....

:thumbup:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2019, 09:58 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/31/17
Posts: 1800
Post Likes: +721
Aircraft: C180
Username Protected wrote:
Quote:
Only thing you're doing wrong is being honest....


:lol: :lol:
One of the first things I discovered was all my airplanes were heavier, slower, burned more fuel, and worth less than everyone else's. :roll: :roll:


:lol:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2019, 11:08 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/06/09
Posts: 471
Post Likes: +166
Aircraft: A185F
Username Protected wrote:
I get 130-135 KTAS burning 12.5 gph LOP in my 185 with 8.50’s. Maybe I’m doing something wrong?


I got the same speed on my last 185 that had 8.50's, Horton kit, and a IO520. My next 185 isn't running yet, it has the sportsman kit.

Andy


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2019, 13:08 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/30/10
Posts: 4404
Post Likes: +3978
Username Protected wrote:

One of the first things I discovered was all my airplanes were heavier, slower, burned more fuel, and worth less than everyone else's. :roll: :roll:


I agree. After 25 years of flying, I now have a fast plane that doesnt guzzle gas and has virtually no squawks out of the ordinary.

Yeah, I think Im gonna sell it and buy a boat. :roll:

_________________
An Engineer's job is to say No. Until the check clears, then make a mountain from a molehill.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2019, 13:21 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/04/14
Posts: 1930
Post Likes: +1447
Location: Southern California
Aircraft: C 210
What year is the 210?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2019, 18:45 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/29/12
Posts: 674
Post Likes: +263
Username Protected wrote:
What year is the 210?



1984, non turbo. The 185 is a 1978.

rgs,

patrick


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 210 NA vs Cessna 185
PostPosted: 04 Jan 2019, 15:57 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/10/13
Posts: 1341
Post Likes: +558
Location: greenville,ms
Aircraft: baron 58
I used to get about 135kts on my io520 185 with 850's


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Gallagher Aviation, LLC (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.dbm.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.